Greg Rusedski beat Tommy Haas 6-3, 6-4, 6-7(5), 7-6(5) in the Grand Slam Cup final, 1999 on indoor hard court in Munich, Germany
It was the only final for both players at the event and it was the final edition of the event
Rusedski won 148 points, Haas 129
Rusedski serve-volleyed off all but 8 serves (7 firsts, 1 second)
(Note: I’m missing 1 point
Set 1, Game 2, Point 3 - a Haas service point that he won)
Serve Stats
Rusedski...
- 1st serve percentage (80/130) 62%
- 1st serve points won (67/80) 84%
- 2nd serve points won (31/50) 62%
- Aces 30 [1 second serve (a whiff), 2 body hits (1 possibly not clean) & 1 possibly not clean]
- Double Faults 5
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (61/130) 47%
Haas...
- 1st serve percentage (81/147) 55%
- 1st serve points won (59/81) 73%
- 2nd serve points won (38/66) 58%
- ?? serve points won (1/1)
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 9
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (42/147) 29%
Serve Patterns
Rusedski served...
- to FH 42%
- to BH 48%
- to Body 10%
Haas served....
- to FH 27%
- to BH 69%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Rusedski made...
- 96 (34 FH, 62 BH), including 7 runaround FHs, 11 return-approaches & 1 drop-return
- 3 Winners (1 FH, 2 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 1 drop-return
- 36 Errors, comprising...
- 24 Unforced (6 FH, 18 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 5 return-approach attempts
- 12 Forced (7 FH, 5 BH)
- Return Rate (96/138) 70%
Haas made...
- 64 (29 FH, 35 BH)
- 4 Winners (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 31 Errors, all forced...
- 31 Forced (15 FH, 16 BH)
- Return Rate (64/125) 51%
Break Points
Rusedski 3/6 (5 games)
Haas 1/6 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Rusedski 39 (6 FH, 5 BH, 8 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 11 BHV, 8 OH)
Haas 37 (11 FH, 13 BH, 1 FHV, 7 BHV, 4 OH, 1 BHOH)
Rusedski had 18 from serve volley points -
- 13 first 'volleys' (3 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 5 BHV, 3 OH, 1 FH at net)... 1 OH was on the bounce, another can reasonably be called a FHV & the FH at net was a running-down-drop-shot at net
- 3 second volleys (2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 2 third volleys (1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 3 from return-approach points (2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 1 other OH was on the bounce from no-man's land, near the baseline
- FHs - 2 cc passes, 2 dtl (1 runaround return), 1 inside-out
- BHs - 1 cc pass, 1 dtl pass, 1 inside-in return, 1 drop-return, 1 lob
Haas had 18 (7 FH, 11 BH) passes -
- FHs - 2 cc, 3 dtl (2 returns), 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl
- BHs - 4 cc, 4 dtl, 2 inside-in returns, 1 longline
- regular FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in
- regular BHs - 1 cc, 1 drop shot
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a second volley BHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Rusedski 45
- 18 Unforced (6 FH, 4 BH, 3 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)
- 27 Forced (8 FH, 9 BH, 3 FHV, 3 BHV, 2 BH1/2V, 2 OH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 51.1
Haas 39
- 14 Unforced (4 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH pass attempt & 1 BH at net
- 25 Forced (16 FH, 8 BH, 1 Tweener)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Rusedski was...
- 79/117 (68%) at net, including...
- 60/87 (69%) serve-volleying, comprising..
- 31/44 (70%) off 1st serve and...
- 29/43 (67%) off 2nd serve
---
- 6/11 (55%) return-approaching
- 2/4 (50%) forced back/retreated
Haas was...
- 27/40 (68%) at net, including...
- 1/4 (25%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 1/3 (33%) forced back
Match Report
The serve-volleying Rusedski’s serve is biggest reason for his substantial superiority, but he’s tidy in all areas, returning quite comfortably and holding his own from the baseline. Haas looks to play a solid baseline game and isn’t bad at it, though matched by opponent and he’s able to approach to BH regularly for aggression too. He has no equalizer for the serve though. Court is quick
Rusedski with -
- 30 aces (Haas has 6)
- 36% first serves being aces (Haas 7%)
- 62% first serves in (Haas 55%)
- 47% unreturned serves (Haas 29%)
…to go with Haas having more double faults 9-5 (Greg also has a second serve ace), at a worse rate (14% of second serves, compared to 10% for Greg)
That’s gist of how much better Greg has of serve-return. He serve-volleys virtually always to augment effectiveness of that serve
Not bad going by Haas to conjure break points in 3 games with the storm Greg brings. He manages to break just once. Its to love and comes as Greg serves for the match in fourth set
Not bad, but far behind Greg’s returning in-roads. For starters, keeping Haas to 29% unreturneds is a good returning job on this fast court. Healthy to hefty serve from Haas, if not the best placed. Mostly credit to Greg for solid returning consistency for the freebie rate
In baseline rallies, Greg with 4 winners, 10 UEs to Haas’ 6 winners, 10 UEs. That’s not the whole picture because Haas is able to find net more often to win points, but its good launching pad for Greg to go about breaking
Despite high 9 double faults, Haas wins 58% second serve points. San the doubles, that rises to 66%. He plays well too, just not flashily, particularly compared to big serving, serve-volleying opponent
Greg wins 53% of points, serving 47% of them
Break points - Greg 3/6 (5 games), Haas 1/6 (3 games)
That’s pretty comfy for the winner
Rusedski’s serve game
Those 30 aces and 36% first serves being aces fly down in all directions in both courts
Serves 42% to FH, 48% to BH. He even has 2 body serve aces that strike Haas
Greg serve-volleys 86% of time behind first serves (wins 70% serve-volleying, 100% not) and 98% of time behind seconds (wins 67% serve-volleying, wins sole stay back point)
He stays back occasionally off first serves because his all-in first serves are too powerful for him to come in behind; he’d be about half way to service line if he tried. Those serves usually draw hard return errors. He’s staying back on fair few of what turn out to be aces too
The only second serve he stays back off is the first point of match. Behind those, he can reach good position at net
Virtually same winning rate serve-volleying across his serves (70% first, 67% second)
On ‘volley’ Greg has 29 winners, 8 UEs, 10 FEs
Haas on the pass in play has 13 winners (4 FH, 9 BH), 20 FEs (12 FH, 8 BH), 1 UE (a FH), along with 4 return winners at 51% return rate
(That’s for all net points, not just serve-volley)
Solidly good volleying from Greg. Putsaway most of what’s there to be putaway or punches well and wide to leave bad look running passing. The FEs are a little high, given he isn’t faced with many difficult volleys, but they’re disproportionately high from non serve-volley approaches (mostly chip-charge returns, which aren’t going to get him broken)
The tougher stuff is usually pretty powerful, slightly low stuff. Greg actually makes these pretty well, with decent control. He’s not tasked with a lot right to feet
Unusual that Haas’ BH has come out with so much better pass numbers (9 winners, 8 FEs) than FH (4 winners, 12 FEs, 1 UE). Its not that it is so much better but more about how Greg volleys. Much like his serving, Greg doesn’t target a wing but looks to make good quality volleys. When forced to make tough volley, he’s more apt to pointedly go to BH
So the BH gets better looks on the pass. By contrast, when free to volley aggressively, he’s apt to go to FH more, so that wing gets worse look passes
Still, that’s a pretty good job by Haas. All in the context of 30 aces and 31 return errors (all FEs), and just 5 double faults
With the aces taking the eye, low double faults is credit to Greg. Second serves are good for him to win just 3% fewer second serve-volley points than first serve ones, and he has an ace too. 10% second serve double fault rate is worth that
A shot worth mentioning is a first ‘volley’ FH running-down-drop-shot at net winner against a net chord dribbling return. 2 boy serve aces is also unusual
Gist, in context of overwhelming serve, Greg serve-volleying virtually always and volleying solidly well. Haas not bad on the pass. Might be good enough to make a contest of pure volley vs pass, but nowhere near overriding huge damage load of aces and other freebies drawn by Greg’s varied, top class serving
It was the only final for both players at the event and it was the final edition of the event
Rusedski won 148 points, Haas 129
Rusedski serve-volleyed off all but 8 serves (7 firsts, 1 second)
(Note: I’m missing 1 point
Set 1, Game 2, Point 3 - a Haas service point that he won)
Serve Stats
Rusedski...
- 1st serve percentage (80/130) 62%
- 1st serve points won (67/80) 84%
- 2nd serve points won (31/50) 62%
- Aces 30 [1 second serve (a whiff), 2 body hits (1 possibly not clean) & 1 possibly not clean]
- Double Faults 5
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (61/130) 47%
Haas...
- 1st serve percentage (81/147) 55%
- 1st serve points won (59/81) 73%
- 2nd serve points won (38/66) 58%
- ?? serve points won (1/1)
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 9
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (42/147) 29%
Serve Patterns
Rusedski served...
- to FH 42%
- to BH 48%
- to Body 10%
Haas served....
- to FH 27%
- to BH 69%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Rusedski made...
- 96 (34 FH, 62 BH), including 7 runaround FHs, 11 return-approaches & 1 drop-return
- 3 Winners (1 FH, 2 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 1 drop-return
- 36 Errors, comprising...
- 24 Unforced (6 FH, 18 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 5 return-approach attempts
- 12 Forced (7 FH, 5 BH)
- Return Rate (96/138) 70%
Haas made...
- 64 (29 FH, 35 BH)
- 4 Winners (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 31 Errors, all forced...
- 31 Forced (15 FH, 16 BH)
- Return Rate (64/125) 51%
Break Points
Rusedski 3/6 (5 games)
Haas 1/6 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Rusedski 39 (6 FH, 5 BH, 8 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 11 BHV, 8 OH)
Haas 37 (11 FH, 13 BH, 1 FHV, 7 BHV, 4 OH, 1 BHOH)
Rusedski had 18 from serve volley points -
- 13 first 'volleys' (3 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 5 BHV, 3 OH, 1 FH at net)... 1 OH was on the bounce, another can reasonably be called a FHV & the FH at net was a running-down-drop-shot at net
- 3 second volleys (2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 2 third volleys (1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 3 from return-approach points (2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 1 other OH was on the bounce from no-man's land, near the baseline
- FHs - 2 cc passes, 2 dtl (1 runaround return), 1 inside-out
- BHs - 1 cc pass, 1 dtl pass, 1 inside-in return, 1 drop-return, 1 lob
Haas had 18 (7 FH, 11 BH) passes -
- FHs - 2 cc, 3 dtl (2 returns), 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl
- BHs - 4 cc, 4 dtl, 2 inside-in returns, 1 longline
- regular FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in
- regular BHs - 1 cc, 1 drop shot
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a second volley BHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Rusedski 45
- 18 Unforced (6 FH, 4 BH, 3 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)
- 27 Forced (8 FH, 9 BH, 3 FHV, 3 BHV, 2 BH1/2V, 2 OH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 51.1
Haas 39
- 14 Unforced (4 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH pass attempt & 1 BH at net
- 25 Forced (16 FH, 8 BH, 1 Tweener)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Rusedski was...
- 79/117 (68%) at net, including...
- 60/87 (69%) serve-volleying, comprising..
- 31/44 (70%) off 1st serve and...
- 29/43 (67%) off 2nd serve
---
- 6/11 (55%) return-approaching
- 2/4 (50%) forced back/retreated
Haas was...
- 27/40 (68%) at net, including...
- 1/4 (25%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 1/3 (33%) forced back
Match Report
The serve-volleying Rusedski’s serve is biggest reason for his substantial superiority, but he’s tidy in all areas, returning quite comfortably and holding his own from the baseline. Haas looks to play a solid baseline game and isn’t bad at it, though matched by opponent and he’s able to approach to BH regularly for aggression too. He has no equalizer for the serve though. Court is quick
Rusedski with -
- 30 aces (Haas has 6)
- 36% first serves being aces (Haas 7%)
- 62% first serves in (Haas 55%)
- 47% unreturned serves (Haas 29%)
…to go with Haas having more double faults 9-5 (Greg also has a second serve ace), at a worse rate (14% of second serves, compared to 10% for Greg)
That’s gist of how much better Greg has of serve-return. He serve-volleys virtually always to augment effectiveness of that serve
Not bad going by Haas to conjure break points in 3 games with the storm Greg brings. He manages to break just once. Its to love and comes as Greg serves for the match in fourth set
Not bad, but far behind Greg’s returning in-roads. For starters, keeping Haas to 29% unreturneds is a good returning job on this fast court. Healthy to hefty serve from Haas, if not the best placed. Mostly credit to Greg for solid returning consistency for the freebie rate
In baseline rallies, Greg with 4 winners, 10 UEs to Haas’ 6 winners, 10 UEs. That’s not the whole picture because Haas is able to find net more often to win points, but its good launching pad for Greg to go about breaking
Despite high 9 double faults, Haas wins 58% second serve points. San the doubles, that rises to 66%. He plays well too, just not flashily, particularly compared to big serving, serve-volleying opponent
Greg wins 53% of points, serving 47% of them
Break points - Greg 3/6 (5 games), Haas 1/6 (3 games)
That’s pretty comfy for the winner
Rusedski’s serve game
Those 30 aces and 36% first serves being aces fly down in all directions in both courts
Serves 42% to FH, 48% to BH. He even has 2 body serve aces that strike Haas
Greg serve-volleys 86% of time behind first serves (wins 70% serve-volleying, 100% not) and 98% of time behind seconds (wins 67% serve-volleying, wins sole stay back point)
He stays back occasionally off first serves because his all-in first serves are too powerful for him to come in behind; he’d be about half way to service line if he tried. Those serves usually draw hard return errors. He’s staying back on fair few of what turn out to be aces too
The only second serve he stays back off is the first point of match. Behind those, he can reach good position at net
Virtually same winning rate serve-volleying across his serves (70% first, 67% second)
On ‘volley’ Greg has 29 winners, 8 UEs, 10 FEs
Haas on the pass in play has 13 winners (4 FH, 9 BH), 20 FEs (12 FH, 8 BH), 1 UE (a FH), along with 4 return winners at 51% return rate
(That’s for all net points, not just serve-volley)
Solidly good volleying from Greg. Putsaway most of what’s there to be putaway or punches well and wide to leave bad look running passing. The FEs are a little high, given he isn’t faced with many difficult volleys, but they’re disproportionately high from non serve-volley approaches (mostly chip-charge returns, which aren’t going to get him broken)
The tougher stuff is usually pretty powerful, slightly low stuff. Greg actually makes these pretty well, with decent control. He’s not tasked with a lot right to feet
Unusual that Haas’ BH has come out with so much better pass numbers (9 winners, 8 FEs) than FH (4 winners, 12 FEs, 1 UE). Its not that it is so much better but more about how Greg volleys. Much like his serving, Greg doesn’t target a wing but looks to make good quality volleys. When forced to make tough volley, he’s more apt to pointedly go to BH
So the BH gets better looks on the pass. By contrast, when free to volley aggressively, he’s apt to go to FH more, so that wing gets worse look passes
Still, that’s a pretty good job by Haas. All in the context of 30 aces and 31 return errors (all FEs), and just 5 double faults
With the aces taking the eye, low double faults is credit to Greg. Second serves are good for him to win just 3% fewer second serve-volley points than first serve ones, and he has an ace too. 10% second serve double fault rate is worth that
A shot worth mentioning is a first ‘volley’ FH running-down-drop-shot at net winner against a net chord dribbling return. 2 boy serve aces is also unusual
Gist, in context of overwhelming serve, Greg serve-volleying virtually always and volleying solidly well. Haas not bad on the pass. Might be good enough to make a contest of pure volley vs pass, but nowhere near overriding huge damage load of aces and other freebies drawn by Greg’s varied, top class serving