Pete Sampras beat Ivan Lendl 6-3, 3-6, 6-3 in the Cincinnati final, 1992 on hard court
It was Sampras' first Masters equivalent level title. Lendl had reached the final recently at Canadian Open
Sampras won 83 points, Lendl 75
Sampras serve-volleyed off all but 3 first serves
(Note: 1 Sampras service point has been tracked through audio. Its a first serve and draws a return error into the net. Its been assumed error was forced and Sampras was serve-volleying. Serve direction and return type unknown
Point in question - Set 1, Game 7, Point 3)
Serve Stats
Sampras...
- 1st serve percentage (45/80) 56%
- 1st serve points won (31/45) 69%
- 2nd serve points won (20/35) 57%
- Aces 13 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 5
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (28/80) 35%
Lendl...
- 1st serve percentage (43/78) 55%
- 1st serve points won (26/43) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (20/35) 57%
- Aces 12
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (25/78) 32%
Serve Patterns
Sampras served...
- to FH 35%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 5%
Lendl served...
- to FH 23%
- to BH 46%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Sampras made...
- 52 (22 FH, 30 BH), including 9 runaround FHs & 2 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 13 Errors, comprising...
- 6 Unforced (1 FH, 5 BH)
- 7 Forced (4 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (52/77) 68%
Lendl made...
- 47 (12 FH, 35 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 2 Winner (2 FH)
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH, 1 ??)
- Return Rate (47/75) 63%
Break Points
Sampras 4/9 (6 games)
Lendl 3/7 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Sampras 25 (6 FH, 4 BH, 6 FHV, 5 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 2 OH)
Lendl 16 (7 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV)
Sampras had 6 from serve-volley points
- 2 first 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- 4 second 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH, 1 BH at net)
- 2 from return-approach points (1 FHV, 1 OH)
- FHs - 1 cc return pass, 1 dtl, 3 inside-out and 1 inside-in pass
- BHs - 2 cc passes, 1 dtl and 1 net chord dribbler return
Lendl's FHs - 1 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 4 dtl (3 passes - 1 a return, 1 regular return) and 1 inside-out
- BHs - 5 dtl (4 passes) and 1 lob
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Sampras 29
- 19 Unforced (10 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 10 Forced (4 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.5
Lendl 29
- 21 Unforced (13 FH, 8 BH)
- 8 Forced (3 FH, 5 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.2
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Sampras was...
- 32/48 (67%) at net, including...
- 21/35 (60%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 17/30 (57%) off 1st serve and...
- 4/5 (80%) off 2nd serve
---
- 2/2 return-approaching
Lendl was...
- 9/14 (64%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
Match Report
Good match on the whole. Sampras takes matters into his own hands, while Lendl stays on fence on how to go about play
Sampras serve-volleys off all but 3 first serves. From baseline, he's the the one looking to take point by scruff off neck
Lendl does what he can against the serve-volleying (quite well). From baseline, he doesn't seem committed or flexible in how to proceed. Outlast Sampras? Beat him down? Blast him away? Come to net? He does a bit of all of the above. Not too successfully in all but coming to net, which is what he does least
Statistically, its an odd match. Note both players with moderate 1st serve points won (Sampras 69%, Lendl 60%). Looking at that, you'd think conditions were slow and/or server wasn't able to utilize potential of big 1st serve
Conditions are about standard, if anything, on fast side. And both players serve high 12 first serve aces (Sampras also has a 2nd serve). Sans aces, Sampras wins 58% points and Lendl 45.1%.... distinctly low numbers for first serves, especially Lendl
In light of low 1st serve points won, one would expect low 2nd serve points won. In fact, its the opposite - both players winning identical 57% points. Sans double faults, Pete wins very impressive 67%
All of this is odd -
- with so many aces, one would expect players to commandingly dominate 1st serve points where even when returns are made.... doesn't happen
- With both players failing to dominate play from advantageous starting positions, one would expect both to struggle from neutral starting positions of their 2nd serve points.... doesn't happen
- Excelling from neutral starting positions on their 2nd serve points, one would expect both to be threatening returning 2nd serves... which obviously can't happen if both are excelling on 2nd serve points
Sampras matches tend to yield such odd figures due to heavy difference in effort he puts into serve and return games. In this match, that's not the reason. Just the way play runs. Statistically odd though it is, its straight forward enough to put in words
Sampras' Serve-Volley Game
Serve-volleying, Pete scarcely faces a difficult or an easy volley; everythings a regulation, medium paced ball around net high. And 35% unreturned serves is moderate
He volleys decently, well away from Lendl, often into corners, not particularly punched through but not lopped in either. And doesn't miss much. 6 UEs in forecourt.... 3 are in one game that costs him the second set. So just 3 besides a chunk that costs him a set. He looks to volley to BH
Lendl is excellent on running pass, making some superb ones BH dtl, on which he has 4 winners
just 57% points won first serve-volleying (he's also 4/5 off second serves). Mostly credit to Lendl for good passing and a few regulation errors from Pete. Which leaves...
It was Sampras' first Masters equivalent level title. Lendl had reached the final recently at Canadian Open
Sampras won 83 points, Lendl 75
Sampras serve-volleyed off all but 3 first serves
(Note: 1 Sampras service point has been tracked through audio. Its a first serve and draws a return error into the net. Its been assumed error was forced and Sampras was serve-volleying. Serve direction and return type unknown
Point in question - Set 1, Game 7, Point 3)
Serve Stats
Sampras...
- 1st serve percentage (45/80) 56%
- 1st serve points won (31/45) 69%
- 2nd serve points won (20/35) 57%
- Aces 13 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 5
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (28/80) 35%
Lendl...
- 1st serve percentage (43/78) 55%
- 1st serve points won (26/43) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (20/35) 57%
- Aces 12
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (25/78) 32%
Serve Patterns
Sampras served...
- to FH 35%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 5%
Lendl served...
- to FH 23%
- to BH 46%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Sampras made...
- 52 (22 FH, 30 BH), including 9 runaround FHs & 2 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 13 Errors, comprising...
- 6 Unforced (1 FH, 5 BH)
- 7 Forced (4 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (52/77) 68%
Lendl made...
- 47 (12 FH, 35 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 2 Winner (2 FH)
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH, 1 ??)
- Return Rate (47/75) 63%
Break Points
Sampras 4/9 (6 games)
Lendl 3/7 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Sampras 25 (6 FH, 4 BH, 6 FHV, 5 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 2 OH)
Lendl 16 (7 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV)
Sampras had 6 from serve-volley points
- 2 first 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- 4 second 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH, 1 BH at net)
- 2 from return-approach points (1 FHV, 1 OH)
- FHs - 1 cc return pass, 1 dtl, 3 inside-out and 1 inside-in pass
- BHs - 2 cc passes, 1 dtl and 1 net chord dribbler return
Lendl's FHs - 1 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 4 dtl (3 passes - 1 a return, 1 regular return) and 1 inside-out
- BHs - 5 dtl (4 passes) and 1 lob
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Sampras 29
- 19 Unforced (10 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 10 Forced (4 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.5
Lendl 29
- 21 Unforced (13 FH, 8 BH)
- 8 Forced (3 FH, 5 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.2
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Sampras was...
- 32/48 (67%) at net, including...
- 21/35 (60%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 17/30 (57%) off 1st serve and...
- 4/5 (80%) off 2nd serve
---
- 2/2 return-approaching
Lendl was...
- 9/14 (64%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
Match Report
Good match on the whole. Sampras takes matters into his own hands, while Lendl stays on fence on how to go about play
Sampras serve-volleys off all but 3 first serves. From baseline, he's the the one looking to take point by scruff off neck
Lendl does what he can against the serve-volleying (quite well). From baseline, he doesn't seem committed or flexible in how to proceed. Outlast Sampras? Beat him down? Blast him away? Come to net? He does a bit of all of the above. Not too successfully in all but coming to net, which is what he does least
Statistically, its an odd match. Note both players with moderate 1st serve points won (Sampras 69%, Lendl 60%). Looking at that, you'd think conditions were slow and/or server wasn't able to utilize potential of big 1st serve
Conditions are about standard, if anything, on fast side. And both players serve high 12 first serve aces (Sampras also has a 2nd serve). Sans aces, Sampras wins 58% points and Lendl 45.1%.... distinctly low numbers for first serves, especially Lendl
In light of low 1st serve points won, one would expect low 2nd serve points won. In fact, its the opposite - both players winning identical 57% points. Sans double faults, Pete wins very impressive 67%
All of this is odd -
- with so many aces, one would expect players to commandingly dominate 1st serve points where even when returns are made.... doesn't happen
- With both players failing to dominate play from advantageous starting positions, one would expect both to struggle from neutral starting positions of their 2nd serve points.... doesn't happen
- Excelling from neutral starting positions on their 2nd serve points, one would expect both to be threatening returning 2nd serves... which obviously can't happen if both are excelling on 2nd serve points
Sampras matches tend to yield such odd figures due to heavy difference in effort he puts into serve and return games. In this match, that's not the reason. Just the way play runs. Statistically odd though it is, its straight forward enough to put in words
Sampras' Serve-Volley Game
Serve-volleying, Pete scarcely faces a difficult or an easy volley; everythings a regulation, medium paced ball around net high. And 35% unreturned serves is moderate
He volleys decently, well away from Lendl, often into corners, not particularly punched through but not lopped in either. And doesn't miss much. 6 UEs in forecourt.... 3 are in one game that costs him the second set. So just 3 besides a chunk that costs him a set. He looks to volley to BH
Lendl is excellent on running pass, making some superb ones BH dtl, on which he has 4 winners
just 57% points won first serve-volleying (he's also 4/5 off second serves). Mostly credit to Lendl for good passing and a few regulation errors from Pete. Which leaves...