Jannik Sinner beat Grigor Dimitrov 6-3, 6-1 in the Miami final, 2024 on hard court
Sinner had recently won his maiden Slam title in Australian Open. The 11th seeded Dimitrov beat 3 top 8 seeds, including #1 Carlos Alcaraz, en route to the final
Sinner won 55 points, Dimitrov 38
Serve Stats
Sinner...
- 1st serve percentage (24/43) 56%
- 1st serve points won (21/24) 88%
- 2nd serve points won (12/19) 63%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (15/43) 35%
Dimitrov...
- 1st serve percentage (32/50) 64%
- 1st serve points won (19/32) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (9/18) 50%
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (11/50) 22%
Serve Patterns
Sinner served...
- to FH 17%
- to BH 64%
- to Body 19%
Dimitrov served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 51%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Sinner made...
- 38 (17 FH, 21 BH)
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 5 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH)
- 4 Forced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (38/49) 78%
Dimitrov made...
- 27 (4 FH, 23 BH)
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 BH)
- 9 Forced (2 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (27/42) 64%
Break Points
Sinner 4/8 (5 games)
Dimitrov 0/1
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Sinner 11 (7 FH, 2 BH, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Dimitrov 12 (4 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
Sinner's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl (1 pass, 1 at net), 2 inside-out (1 return), 1 inside-in
- BHs - 2 dtl (1 pass)
Dimitrov's FH - 1 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl, 1 inside-in/cc
- BHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl, 1 inside-out return, 1 net chord dribbler
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a second volley FHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Sinner 14
- 8 Unforced (8 FH)
- 6 Forced (4 FH, 2 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.3
Dimitrov 28
- 23 Unforced (8 FH, 13 BH, 2 OH)... with 1 OH on the bounce from the baseline
- 5 Forced (3 FH, 1 BH, 1 FHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.7
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Sinner was 5/5 (100%) at net
Dimitrov was...
- 7/13 (54%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 0/1 retreating
Match Report
Impressive, power-baseline showing from Sinner that overwhelms a potentially good Dimitrov. Court is quick
Sinner leads freebies 35% to 22%, with both players serving well. Sinner’s second serving and ability to return anything shy of untouchable serve stand out here
In play, Sinner with 11 winners, 8 UEs (funnily, all his UEs are FHs - which I don’t think I’ve seen before for a baseline match). Dimi with 23 UEs dwarfs that, but that’s not as bad as it looks and is a product of being outmatched, rather than absolute sense bad play
Sinner’s stock hitting is powerful and deep off both sides. Constantly, without let up. Dimi looks to be aggressive, stepping in and smacking winners early and does it some (he has 12 winners and plays many fine shots), but he gets nothing to work with.
Even drawing a soft return he can wade into is rare - and he serves well. He’s put in position of going for his shot against good balls - and some lovely winners so doing. But if that’s what you have to do to win points - hit clean winners against good balls from standard positions - your in a bit of trouble
Good serving from both. Sinner considerably better on the return
Its quick court, and pace of serves alone are tough to handle. Dim gets 64% first serves in to Sinner’s 56%
First serve ace rates - Sinner 17%, Dimi 19%, fine numbers from both
Anything shy of an ace from Dimi is liable to come back hard. He’s drawn just 5 return errors, while serving 6 aces. Quality of his first serve is very good. Could expect more freebies, could expect more weak returns
He doesn’t get many of either. Lovely, easy movement for the return by Sinner, and clinically easy thumping them. Just a small number of weak returns too. The combo of movement, and easy, clinical power - neutralizing or initiative snatching - from Sinner on the return is similar to Novak Djokovic at his best - and there’s no higher compliment than that. Against good serve, and on quick court
Sinner has his own brutish serve. Uses the one to the body well (directs high 19% there - 2% more than he does to the FH), and has Dimi playing self defence with some of those. Brutish first serves is common enough, however effective, so it’s the quality second serves that stand out. Also brutish
Gist of it all, unreturneds - Sinner 35%, Dimi 22%, then they rally
Winners - Sinner 11, Dimi 12
Errors Forced - Sinner 5, Dimi 6
UEs - Sinner 8, Dimi 23
Looks more like a poor showing from Dimi, with his UEs greater than combined winners and combined FEs. That’s deceptive and shaped by Sinner’s style of play
Persistent, deep, beat-down powerful groundstrokes being said style of play. Not necessarily hitting wide, so Dimi can reach ball without trouble. Can handle 1, 2, 3 balls too, hitting back firmly… but next one and the one after that and one after that all come back same way ‘til Dimi cracks. Call them ‘pressured’ errors - categorically different from passive rallying
Other stand out is Sinner’s movement. He doesn’t move well for a big guy, he moves well period. Running, sliding, hitting on the stretch. Gets racquet on what look like sure winners and against less powerful attacking shots, even tends to hit back with neutralizing authority while stretched out after full run. Again, similar to Djokovic
Dimi is the more aggressive, in that he looks for shot-making winners (constructing points aggressively is very difficult against Sinner’s hitting). And makes them
4 FH winners, most from behind baseline against good balls. 5 BH winners, most of them shots out of blue. Both dtl winners are against good FH inside-outs. Just 2 winner attempt UEs - fine shot-making from Dimi, who has to make his own chances, does and executes
Constructing points aggressively is scarcely possible due to Sinner’s exemplary stock hitting. Hanging with him rallying doesn’t go well either
Neutral UEs - Sinner 4, Dimi 12… with Sinner’s hitting harder (Dimi doesn’t hit softly either, but he’s outmatched here), and as rally goes on, Dimi’s shots getting weaker as Sinner gains in the rally
What passes for Sinner’s ‘neutral’ is borderline attacking, and certainly pressuring. Once again, like Djokovic at his best and this time, a younger Djokovic. Doesn’t overdo the aggressive finishing. Something in between continuing to pound down Dimi and sometimes, flashing a winner away. A sharply angled FH cc from out of nowhere stands out for shot making
Sinner had recently won his maiden Slam title in Australian Open. The 11th seeded Dimitrov beat 3 top 8 seeds, including #1 Carlos Alcaraz, en route to the final
Sinner won 55 points, Dimitrov 38
Serve Stats
Sinner...
- 1st serve percentage (24/43) 56%
- 1st serve points won (21/24) 88%
- 2nd serve points won (12/19) 63%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (15/43) 35%
Dimitrov...
- 1st serve percentage (32/50) 64%
- 1st serve points won (19/32) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (9/18) 50%
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (11/50) 22%
Serve Patterns
Sinner served...
- to FH 17%
- to BH 64%
- to Body 19%
Dimitrov served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 51%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Sinner made...
- 38 (17 FH, 21 BH)
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 5 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH)
- 4 Forced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (38/49) 78%
Dimitrov made...
- 27 (4 FH, 23 BH)
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 BH)
- 9 Forced (2 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (27/42) 64%
Break Points
Sinner 4/8 (5 games)
Dimitrov 0/1
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Sinner 11 (7 FH, 2 BH, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Dimitrov 12 (4 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
Sinner's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl (1 pass, 1 at net), 2 inside-out (1 return), 1 inside-in
- BHs - 2 dtl (1 pass)
Dimitrov's FH - 1 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl, 1 inside-in/cc
- BHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl, 1 inside-out return, 1 net chord dribbler
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a second volley FHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Sinner 14
- 8 Unforced (8 FH)
- 6 Forced (4 FH, 2 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.3
Dimitrov 28
- 23 Unforced (8 FH, 13 BH, 2 OH)... with 1 OH on the bounce from the baseline
- 5 Forced (3 FH, 1 BH, 1 FHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.7
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Sinner was 5/5 (100%) at net
Dimitrov was...
- 7/13 (54%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 0/1 retreating
Match Report
Impressive, power-baseline showing from Sinner that overwhelms a potentially good Dimitrov. Court is quick
Sinner leads freebies 35% to 22%, with both players serving well. Sinner’s second serving and ability to return anything shy of untouchable serve stand out here
In play, Sinner with 11 winners, 8 UEs (funnily, all his UEs are FHs - which I don’t think I’ve seen before for a baseline match). Dimi with 23 UEs dwarfs that, but that’s not as bad as it looks and is a product of being outmatched, rather than absolute sense bad play
Sinner’s stock hitting is powerful and deep off both sides. Constantly, without let up. Dimi looks to be aggressive, stepping in and smacking winners early and does it some (he has 12 winners and plays many fine shots), but he gets nothing to work with.
Even drawing a soft return he can wade into is rare - and he serves well. He’s put in position of going for his shot against good balls - and some lovely winners so doing. But if that’s what you have to do to win points - hit clean winners against good balls from standard positions - your in a bit of trouble
Good serving from both. Sinner considerably better on the return
Its quick court, and pace of serves alone are tough to handle. Dim gets 64% first serves in to Sinner’s 56%
First serve ace rates - Sinner 17%, Dimi 19%, fine numbers from both
Anything shy of an ace from Dimi is liable to come back hard. He’s drawn just 5 return errors, while serving 6 aces. Quality of his first serve is very good. Could expect more freebies, could expect more weak returns
He doesn’t get many of either. Lovely, easy movement for the return by Sinner, and clinically easy thumping them. Just a small number of weak returns too. The combo of movement, and easy, clinical power - neutralizing or initiative snatching - from Sinner on the return is similar to Novak Djokovic at his best - and there’s no higher compliment than that. Against good serve, and on quick court
Sinner has his own brutish serve. Uses the one to the body well (directs high 19% there - 2% more than he does to the FH), and has Dimi playing self defence with some of those. Brutish first serves is common enough, however effective, so it’s the quality second serves that stand out. Also brutish
Gist of it all, unreturneds - Sinner 35%, Dimi 22%, then they rally
Winners - Sinner 11, Dimi 12
Errors Forced - Sinner 5, Dimi 6
UEs - Sinner 8, Dimi 23
Looks more like a poor showing from Dimi, with his UEs greater than combined winners and combined FEs. That’s deceptive and shaped by Sinner’s style of play
Persistent, deep, beat-down powerful groundstrokes being said style of play. Not necessarily hitting wide, so Dimi can reach ball without trouble. Can handle 1, 2, 3 balls too, hitting back firmly… but next one and the one after that and one after that all come back same way ‘til Dimi cracks. Call them ‘pressured’ errors - categorically different from passive rallying
Other stand out is Sinner’s movement. He doesn’t move well for a big guy, he moves well period. Running, sliding, hitting on the stretch. Gets racquet on what look like sure winners and against less powerful attacking shots, even tends to hit back with neutralizing authority while stretched out after full run. Again, similar to Djokovic
Dimi is the more aggressive, in that he looks for shot-making winners (constructing points aggressively is very difficult against Sinner’s hitting). And makes them
4 FH winners, most from behind baseline against good balls. 5 BH winners, most of them shots out of blue. Both dtl winners are against good FH inside-outs. Just 2 winner attempt UEs - fine shot-making from Dimi, who has to make his own chances, does and executes
Constructing points aggressively is scarcely possible due to Sinner’s exemplary stock hitting. Hanging with him rallying doesn’t go well either
Neutral UEs - Sinner 4, Dimi 12… with Sinner’s hitting harder (Dimi doesn’t hit softly either, but he’s outmatched here), and as rally goes on, Dimi’s shots getting weaker as Sinner gains in the rally
What passes for Sinner’s ‘neutral’ is borderline attacking, and certainly pressuring. Once again, like Djokovic at his best and this time, a younger Djokovic. Doesn’t overdo the aggressive finishing. Something in between continuing to pound down Dimi and sometimes, flashing a winner away. A sharply angled FH cc from out of nowhere stands out for shot making
Last edited: