Michael Stich beat Boris Becker 6-4, 7-6(4), 6-4 in the Wimbledon final, 1991 on grass
It would turn out to be Stich's sole Slam title. Becker was playing his 4th straight final at the event, having met Stefan Edberg in the previous 3 finals. To win the title, the 6th seeded Stich defeated 4th seed & French Open champion Jim Courier in the quarters, 1st seed & would go onto become US Open champion for the year Edberg in the semis while Becker was the 2nd seed & Australian Open champion
Stich won 111 points, Becker 103
Both players serve-volleyed off all serves
Serve Stats
Stich...
- 1st serve percentage (46/100) 46%
- 1st serve points won (37/46) 80%
- 2nd serve points won (30/54) 56%
- Aces 15 (2 second serves), Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (51/100) 51%
Becker...
- 1st serve percentage (66/114) 58%
- 1st serve points won (44/66) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (26/48) 54%
- Aces 10, Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (40/114) 35%
Serve Patterns
Stich served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 6%
Becker served...
- to FH 35%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 8%
Return Stats
Stich made...
- 70 (19 FH, 51 BH)
- 13 Winners (4 FH, 9 BH)
- 28 Errors, all forced...
- 28 Forced (12 FH, 16 BH)
- Return Rate (70/110) 64%
Becker made...
- 46 (11 FH, 35 BH)
- 6 Winners (2 FH, 4 BH)
- 34 Errors, all forced...
- 34 Forced (12 FH, 22 BH)
- Return Rate (46/97) 47%
Break Points
Stich 4/16 (10 games)
Becker 2/3 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Stich 34 (8 FH, 17 BH, 5 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Becker 23 (5 FH, 7 BH, 6 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)
Stich had 9 from serve-volley points
- 5 first 'volleys' (2 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 BH at net)... the BH at net was a drop shot
- 4 second volleys (3 FHV, 1 OH)
- 1 non serve-volley BHV played net-to-net
- 13 returns (4 FH, 9 BH)
- FHs (all passes) - 1 cc, 1 inside-out and 2 inside-in
- BH passes - 6 dtl and 2 inside-in
- regular BH - 1 net chord dribbler
- regular FH passes - 3 dtl
- regular FH - 1 dtl at net
- regular BH passes - 2 cc, 1 cc/longline, 2 dtl and 2 inside-out
Becker had 11 from serve-volley points
- 3 first volleys (3 FHV)
- 5 second volleys (2 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 2 third volleys (1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 1 fourth volley (1 BHV)
- 6 returns (2 FH, 4 BH), all passes
- FHs - 2 cc
- BHs - 4 cc
- regular FH passes - 1 cc, 1 dtl/inside-out and 1 longline
- regular BH pass - 1 cc
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Stich 37
- 8 Unforced (1 FH, 2 FHV, 5 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 29 Forced (5 FH, 14 BH, 3 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 2 BHV, 4 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.5
Becker 22
- 9 Unforced (2 BH, 5 FHV, 2 BHV)... with 1 BH at net & 1 BH pass attempt
- 13 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 4 FH1/2V, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 56.7
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Stich was...
- 52/82 (63%) at net, including...
- 50/80 (63%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 22/31 (71%) off 1st serve and...
- 28/49 (57%) off 2nd serve
Becker was...
- 58/98 (59%) at net, all serve-volleying, comprising...
- 32/54 (59%) off 1st serve and...
- 26/44 (59%) off 2nd serve
Match Report
The return is the key difference between two similar, big serving, serve-volleyers. Stich is outstanding, Becker is below par
Statistically, this match is a bit odd. After two sets, there's nothing between the two on that level to differentiate between the two players. Both had won exactly 73 points, similar numbers on first and second serve points won.... it looks very much like a typical grass court point-here, point-there affair. By the end, that has changed. Becker faces break points in all 5 service games in the third set and the final break point numbers - Stich 4/16 in 10 games, Becker 2/3 in 3 - speaks to the winners superiority
Nor are the stats for first two sets deceptive. Becker holds to love a number of times and his only break is to love. But... during periods when Stich is getting returns in, Boris has a challenging time seeing him off. Meanwhile, Stich loses odd points on serve without being under any real danger of being broken
In that light, one would tend to favour Stich coming out ahead, but its not that simple when Boris is concerned. He often does this... doing next to nothing in return games, then suddenly pulling out top notch game of heavy returns and passes to get the break. In fact, that's exactly what he does do to get his sole break of the match, where he breaks to love with 4 passing winners
As it turns out, Boris continues to struggle to return in general as he'd done all match. While whatever returns Stich makes are very challenging
Return rate - Stich 64%, Becker 47%
Return winners - Stich 13, Becker 6
First 'volley' winners - Stich 5, Becker 3
A combo of the above stats largely tells the story of the match. In close Big Game matches, unreturned serve rate tends to be inversely related to first volley winners (in words - 1 guy wins points with unreturned serves, the other knocks of easy volley winners... it comes to the same thing)
Here, Stich's winning points with unreturned serves, but Boris isn't knocking off easy volley winners. In fact, he's getting passed and being forced into first 'volley' errors. Note high 5 half-volley FEs. He has just 2 volleys by contrast. Most are first 'volleys'
Another unexpected finding is that its Boris relative lack of success on first serves rather than seconds that's key to result
Second serve points are near same - Stich winning 56%, Boris 54% - speaks to both players serving and volleying well
First serves though - Stich wins 80%, Boris 67% - for a big server, Boris' number is low. In fact, serve-volleying (i.e. sans aces/service winners and double faults), he wins 59% behind both serves
That's Stich's return at work. Unless aced, he's liable to do big damage with the return. Boris by contrast can barely get the ball back in play
It would turn out to be Stich's sole Slam title. Becker was playing his 4th straight final at the event, having met Stefan Edberg in the previous 3 finals. To win the title, the 6th seeded Stich defeated 4th seed & French Open champion Jim Courier in the quarters, 1st seed & would go onto become US Open champion for the year Edberg in the semis while Becker was the 2nd seed & Australian Open champion
Stich won 111 points, Becker 103
Both players serve-volleyed off all serves
Serve Stats
Stich...
- 1st serve percentage (46/100) 46%
- 1st serve points won (37/46) 80%
- 2nd serve points won (30/54) 56%
- Aces 15 (2 second serves), Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (51/100) 51%
Becker...
- 1st serve percentage (66/114) 58%
- 1st serve points won (44/66) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (26/48) 54%
- Aces 10, Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (40/114) 35%
Serve Patterns
Stich served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 6%
Becker served...
- to FH 35%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 8%
Return Stats
Stich made...
- 70 (19 FH, 51 BH)
- 13 Winners (4 FH, 9 BH)
- 28 Errors, all forced...
- 28 Forced (12 FH, 16 BH)
- Return Rate (70/110) 64%
Becker made...
- 46 (11 FH, 35 BH)
- 6 Winners (2 FH, 4 BH)
- 34 Errors, all forced...
- 34 Forced (12 FH, 22 BH)
- Return Rate (46/97) 47%
Break Points
Stich 4/16 (10 games)
Becker 2/3 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Stich 34 (8 FH, 17 BH, 5 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Becker 23 (5 FH, 7 BH, 6 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)
Stich had 9 from serve-volley points
- 5 first 'volleys' (2 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 BH at net)... the BH at net was a drop shot
- 4 second volleys (3 FHV, 1 OH)
- 1 non serve-volley BHV played net-to-net
- 13 returns (4 FH, 9 BH)
- FHs (all passes) - 1 cc, 1 inside-out and 2 inside-in
- BH passes - 6 dtl and 2 inside-in
- regular BH - 1 net chord dribbler
- regular FH passes - 3 dtl
- regular FH - 1 dtl at net
- regular BH passes - 2 cc, 1 cc/longline, 2 dtl and 2 inside-out
Becker had 11 from serve-volley points
- 3 first volleys (3 FHV)
- 5 second volleys (2 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 2 third volleys (1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 1 fourth volley (1 BHV)
- 6 returns (2 FH, 4 BH), all passes
- FHs - 2 cc
- BHs - 4 cc
- regular FH passes - 1 cc, 1 dtl/inside-out and 1 longline
- regular BH pass - 1 cc
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Stich 37
- 8 Unforced (1 FH, 2 FHV, 5 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 29 Forced (5 FH, 14 BH, 3 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 2 BHV, 4 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.5
Becker 22
- 9 Unforced (2 BH, 5 FHV, 2 BHV)... with 1 BH at net & 1 BH pass attempt
- 13 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 4 FH1/2V, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 56.7
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Stich was...
- 52/82 (63%) at net, including...
- 50/80 (63%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 22/31 (71%) off 1st serve and...
- 28/49 (57%) off 2nd serve
Becker was...
- 58/98 (59%) at net, all serve-volleying, comprising...
- 32/54 (59%) off 1st serve and...
- 26/44 (59%) off 2nd serve
Match Report
The return is the key difference between two similar, big serving, serve-volleyers. Stich is outstanding, Becker is below par
Statistically, this match is a bit odd. After two sets, there's nothing between the two on that level to differentiate between the two players. Both had won exactly 73 points, similar numbers on first and second serve points won.... it looks very much like a typical grass court point-here, point-there affair. By the end, that has changed. Becker faces break points in all 5 service games in the third set and the final break point numbers - Stich 4/16 in 10 games, Becker 2/3 in 3 - speaks to the winners superiority
Nor are the stats for first two sets deceptive. Becker holds to love a number of times and his only break is to love. But... during periods when Stich is getting returns in, Boris has a challenging time seeing him off. Meanwhile, Stich loses odd points on serve without being under any real danger of being broken
In that light, one would tend to favour Stich coming out ahead, but its not that simple when Boris is concerned. He often does this... doing next to nothing in return games, then suddenly pulling out top notch game of heavy returns and passes to get the break. In fact, that's exactly what he does do to get his sole break of the match, where he breaks to love with 4 passing winners
As it turns out, Boris continues to struggle to return in general as he'd done all match. While whatever returns Stich makes are very challenging
Return rate - Stich 64%, Becker 47%
Return winners - Stich 13, Becker 6
First 'volley' winners - Stich 5, Becker 3
A combo of the above stats largely tells the story of the match. In close Big Game matches, unreturned serve rate tends to be inversely related to first volley winners (in words - 1 guy wins points with unreturned serves, the other knocks of easy volley winners... it comes to the same thing)
Here, Stich's winning points with unreturned serves, but Boris isn't knocking off easy volley winners. In fact, he's getting passed and being forced into first 'volley' errors. Note high 5 half-volley FEs. He has just 2 volleys by contrast. Most are first 'volleys'
Another unexpected finding is that its Boris relative lack of success on first serves rather than seconds that's key to result
Second serve points are near same - Stich winning 56%, Boris 54% - speaks to both players serving and volleying well
First serves though - Stich wins 80%, Boris 67% - for a big server, Boris' number is low. In fact, serve-volleying (i.e. sans aces/service winners and double faults), he wins 59% behind both serves
That's Stich's return at work. Unless aced, he's liable to do big damage with the return. Boris by contrast can barely get the ball back in play