Stefanos Tsitsipas beat Casper Ruud 6-1, 6-4 in the Monte Carlo final, 2024 on clay
It was Tsitsipas’ third title at the event. The two would meet in the Barcelona final soon after, with Ruud winning
Tsitsipas won 71 points, Ruud 57
Serve Stats
Tsitsipas...
- 1st serve percentage (35/73) 48%
- 1st serve points won (21/35) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (26/38) 68%
- Aces 3 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (14/73) 19%
Ruud...
- 1st serve percentage (36/55) 65%
- 1st serve points won (24/36) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (7/19) 37%
- Aces 2
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (8/55) 15%
Serve Patterns
Tsitsipas served...
- to FH 36%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 3%
Ruud served...
- to FH 22%
- to BH 78%
Return Stats
Tsitsipas made...
- 46 (12 FH, 34 BH), including 3 runaround FHs
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (5 BH)
- 1 Forced (1 BH)
- Return Rate (46/54) 85%
Ruud made...
- 58 (29 FH, 29 BH), including 8 runaround FHs
- 3 Winners (3 FH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (4 FH, 1 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 6 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- Return Rate (58/72) 81%
Break Points
Tsitsipas 4/8 (5 games)
Ruud 0/8 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Tsitsipas 27 (11 FH, 2 BH, 3 FHV, 5 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 5 OH)
Ruud 18 (9 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV, 3 OH)
Tsitsipas' FHs - 4 cc, 2 dtl, 2 inside-out, 2 inside-in, 1 longline at net
- BHs - 2 dtl
-7 from serve-volley points -
- 6 first 'volleys' (2 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- 1 second volley (1 BHV)
- 1 OH was on the bounce
Ruud's FHs - 3 cc (1 return, 2 passes - 1 at net), 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl return pass, 1 dtl/inside-out pass, 1 inside-out at net, 2 inside-in (1 return)
- BHs - 3 dtl
- 2 OHs were on the bounce
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Tsitsipas 30
- 20 Unforced (11 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 2 OH)... with 1 baseline drive FHV
- 10 Forced (8 FH, 2 BH)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.5
Ruud 29
- 17 Unforced (12 FH, 4 BH, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 12 Forced (9 FH, 1 BH, 1 BHV, 1 Back-to-Net)... with 2 FH running-down-drop-shot (1 at net, 1 not)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.6
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Tsitsipas was...
- 21/29 (72%) at net, including...
- 9/13 (69%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 2/5 (40%) off 1st serve and...
- 7/8 (88%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Ruud was...
- 16/20 (80%) at net, including...
- 2/2 serve-volleying, both 1st serves
---
- 1/1 forced back
Match Report
Tsitsipas plays particularly well and while having better of things, its not to extent 4 & 1 scoreline might suggest. Ruud has trouble returning with any authority and over-does the back-away FH’ng. That and his backward returning position leaves him vulnerable and Tsitsipas takes advantage with style
6-4 sets being close is common, but even the 6-1 one isn’t too one sided with Tsis enduring 2 long holds. And in second set, he’s regularly under the gun to hold. He just about manages, and pinches the sole break to take it
All those long games leads to Tsis actually serving 2 more points than he wins - which isn’t what you normally see for 1 & 4
Tsis winning 55.5% of points, but also serving 57.0% of them
Break points - Tsis 4/8 (5 games), Ruud 0/8 (4 games)
These aren’t the only odd stats. Just the most basic ones -
1st serve in - Tsis 48%, Ruud 65%
1st serve won - Tsis 60%, Ruud 67%
2nd serve won - Tsis 68%, Ruud 37%
Tsis’ low in count is first strange one. And his winning more second serve points than firsts is obviously another. Ruud with normal figures
Odd or not, it’s a good match. Both players finish with more winners than UEs -
Tsis 27 winners, 20 UEs
Ruud 18 winners, 17 UEs
2 problems with Ruud’s game, which are only hinted at by stats
- he returns from well-back, both first and second serves. For first serves, understandable because Tsis has a fat one. Second serves, less so. Tsis has a good second serve, but not something that opponents would feel the need to take from well-back position
In conjunction with the backward position, he returns less than firmly and often short (including second serves). Tsis able to command third ball as he wants
Clever enough to pick up on all this, Tsis makes hay second serve-volleying. He’s 7/8 so doing, usually finishing with drop volley winners. Ruud misses odd regulation second return too after Tsis turns to second serve-volleying, very likely due to concerns about Tsis possibly coming in behind the serve
Even sans the serve-volleying, Tsis wins 19/30 or 63% second serve points. Ruud winning just 37% of his second serve points, and also Tsis’ non serve-volley ones is one indicator of how the two players stack up. But he’s done well to keep the big serving Tsis down to just 60% first serve points won
Stratagems around second serves change across match. It isn’t until second set Tsis turns to serve-volleying and not far after, Ruud steps up to return from normal and occasionally, early return position
He’s uncomfy doing so, which justifies his taking backward position in first place, but credit for having the brains to know something different had to be done. Not particularly good returning from normal position - returns tend to be soft, not cleanly hit - but its better than being at the mercy of routine putaway volleys first up. And they’re not all scraggy contacts. He’s got 3 return winners
Still, Ruud’s returning is a problem. Seemingly, just doesn’t have ability to be neutralizing with it. He had all kinds of trouble in his first Masters final returning high kickers too
- he excessively avoids playing BHs, by moving over to take FHs. Ruud is a FH > BH player, and those guys tend to move over fair amount, but Ruud here is moving over to hit not-strong FH inside-outs or longline, with FH side open
Fairly easy for Tsis to slap big FH cc’s (or inside-in) into open court aggressively. Effective back-away FH play involves hitting extra hard, to keep opponent from being able to do exactly what Tsis is able to do. Tsis does it well - but its not too tough a job against kinds of average or even soft balls Ruud presents him with. The kind of back-away FH’ng Ruud does might be seen from someone with a pitifully weak BH that’s liable to leak errors against neutral balls
Match low 4 UEs from Ruud BH. To go with 3 winners (all dtl), that looks outstanding - rock of the match and not just a shield. In reality, it sees little action, with Ruud orchestrating things for that to be so
A little oddly, when he does have to play BHs (and at times, it seems that only happens when he has no other choice), Ruud tends to go aggressively dtl with it. Shots there - most BHs he plays are when he’s well over to side line (if he weren’t, he move over to play FH). Ergo 3 dtl winners - not a bad yield
It was Tsitsipas’ third title at the event. The two would meet in the Barcelona final soon after, with Ruud winning
Tsitsipas won 71 points, Ruud 57
Serve Stats
Tsitsipas...
- 1st serve percentage (35/73) 48%
- 1st serve points won (21/35) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (26/38) 68%
- Aces 3 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (14/73) 19%
Ruud...
- 1st serve percentage (36/55) 65%
- 1st serve points won (24/36) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (7/19) 37%
- Aces 2
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (8/55) 15%
Serve Patterns
Tsitsipas served...
- to FH 36%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 3%
Ruud served...
- to FH 22%
- to BH 78%
Return Stats
Tsitsipas made...
- 46 (12 FH, 34 BH), including 3 runaround FHs
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (5 BH)
- 1 Forced (1 BH)
- Return Rate (46/54) 85%
Ruud made...
- 58 (29 FH, 29 BH), including 8 runaround FHs
- 3 Winners (3 FH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (4 FH, 1 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 6 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- Return Rate (58/72) 81%
Break Points
Tsitsipas 4/8 (5 games)
Ruud 0/8 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Tsitsipas 27 (11 FH, 2 BH, 3 FHV, 5 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 5 OH)
Ruud 18 (9 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV, 3 OH)
Tsitsipas' FHs - 4 cc, 2 dtl, 2 inside-out, 2 inside-in, 1 longline at net
- BHs - 2 dtl
-7 from serve-volley points -
- 6 first 'volleys' (2 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- 1 second volley (1 BHV)
- 1 OH was on the bounce
Ruud's FHs - 3 cc (1 return, 2 passes - 1 at net), 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl return pass, 1 dtl/inside-out pass, 1 inside-out at net, 2 inside-in (1 return)
- BHs - 3 dtl
- 2 OHs were on the bounce
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Tsitsipas 30
- 20 Unforced (11 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 2 OH)... with 1 baseline drive FHV
- 10 Forced (8 FH, 2 BH)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.5
Ruud 29
- 17 Unforced (12 FH, 4 BH, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 12 Forced (9 FH, 1 BH, 1 BHV, 1 Back-to-Net)... with 2 FH running-down-drop-shot (1 at net, 1 not)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.6
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Tsitsipas was...
- 21/29 (72%) at net, including...
- 9/13 (69%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 2/5 (40%) off 1st serve and...
- 7/8 (88%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Ruud was...
- 16/20 (80%) at net, including...
- 2/2 serve-volleying, both 1st serves
---
- 1/1 forced back
Match Report
Tsitsipas plays particularly well and while having better of things, its not to extent 4 & 1 scoreline might suggest. Ruud has trouble returning with any authority and over-does the back-away FH’ng. That and his backward returning position leaves him vulnerable and Tsitsipas takes advantage with style
6-4 sets being close is common, but even the 6-1 one isn’t too one sided with Tsis enduring 2 long holds. And in second set, he’s regularly under the gun to hold. He just about manages, and pinches the sole break to take it
All those long games leads to Tsis actually serving 2 more points than he wins - which isn’t what you normally see for 1 & 4
Tsis winning 55.5% of points, but also serving 57.0% of them
Break points - Tsis 4/8 (5 games), Ruud 0/8 (4 games)
These aren’t the only odd stats. Just the most basic ones -
1st serve in - Tsis 48%, Ruud 65%
1st serve won - Tsis 60%, Ruud 67%
2nd serve won - Tsis 68%, Ruud 37%
Tsis’ low in count is first strange one. And his winning more second serve points than firsts is obviously another. Ruud with normal figures
Odd or not, it’s a good match. Both players finish with more winners than UEs -
Tsis 27 winners, 20 UEs
Ruud 18 winners, 17 UEs
2 problems with Ruud’s game, which are only hinted at by stats
- he returns from well-back, both first and second serves. For first serves, understandable because Tsis has a fat one. Second serves, less so. Tsis has a good second serve, but not something that opponents would feel the need to take from well-back position
In conjunction with the backward position, he returns less than firmly and often short (including second serves). Tsis able to command third ball as he wants
Clever enough to pick up on all this, Tsis makes hay second serve-volleying. He’s 7/8 so doing, usually finishing with drop volley winners. Ruud misses odd regulation second return too after Tsis turns to second serve-volleying, very likely due to concerns about Tsis possibly coming in behind the serve
Even sans the serve-volleying, Tsis wins 19/30 or 63% second serve points. Ruud winning just 37% of his second serve points, and also Tsis’ non serve-volley ones is one indicator of how the two players stack up. But he’s done well to keep the big serving Tsis down to just 60% first serve points won
Stratagems around second serves change across match. It isn’t until second set Tsis turns to serve-volleying and not far after, Ruud steps up to return from normal and occasionally, early return position
He’s uncomfy doing so, which justifies his taking backward position in first place, but credit for having the brains to know something different had to be done. Not particularly good returning from normal position - returns tend to be soft, not cleanly hit - but its better than being at the mercy of routine putaway volleys first up. And they’re not all scraggy contacts. He’s got 3 return winners
Still, Ruud’s returning is a problem. Seemingly, just doesn’t have ability to be neutralizing with it. He had all kinds of trouble in his first Masters final returning high kickers too
- he excessively avoids playing BHs, by moving over to take FHs. Ruud is a FH > BH player, and those guys tend to move over fair amount, but Ruud here is moving over to hit not-strong FH inside-outs or longline, with FH side open
Fairly easy for Tsis to slap big FH cc’s (or inside-in) into open court aggressively. Effective back-away FH play involves hitting extra hard, to keep opponent from being able to do exactly what Tsis is able to do. Tsis does it well - but its not too tough a job against kinds of average or even soft balls Ruud presents him with. The kind of back-away FH’ng Ruud does might be seen from someone with a pitifully weak BH that’s liable to leak errors against neutral balls
Match low 4 UEs from Ruud BH. To go with 3 winners (all dtl), that looks outstanding - rock of the match and not just a shield. In reality, it sees little action, with Ruud orchestrating things for that to be so
A little oddly, when he does have to play BHs (and at times, it seems that only happens when he has no other choice), Ruud tends to go aggressively dtl with it. Shots there - most BHs he plays are when he’s well over to side line (if he weren’t, he move over to play FH). Ergo 3 dtl winners - not a bad yield