Guillermo Vilas beat John Sadri 7-6(5), 6-3, 6-2 in the Australian Open final, 1979 on grass
Vilas was the defending champion and this would be his second and last title at the event. This would be Sadri’s only Slam final
Vilas won 96 points, Sadri 81
Vilas serve-volleyed off all serves, Sadri off all but 7 (3 firsts, 4 seconds) serves
Serve Stats
Vilas...
- 1st serve percentage (65/95) 68%
- 1st serve points won (52/65) 80%
- 2nd serve points won (14/30) 47%
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (30/95) 32%
Sadri...
- 1st serve percentage (47/82) 57%
- 1st serve points won (35/47) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (17/35) 49%
- Aces 8 (1 possibly not clean), Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (40/82) 49%
Serve Patterns
Vilas served...
- to FH 13%
- to BH 85%
- to Body 2%
Sadri served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 7%
Return Stats
Vilas made...
- 41 (12 FH, 29 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 3 Winners (2 FH, 1 BH)
- 31 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH), a runaround FH
- 30 Forced (15 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (41/81) 51%
Sadri made...
- 61 (4 FH, 57 BH)
- 5 Winners (5 BH)
- 24 Errors, all forced...
- 24 Forced (4 FH, 20 BH)
- Return Rate (61/91) 67%
Break Points
Vilas 4/9 (4 games)
Sadri 1/3 (2 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Vilas 31 (8 FH, 4 BH, 7 FHV, 3 BHV, 5 OH, 4 BHOH)
Sadri 18 (2 FH, 6 BH, 3 FHV, 4 BHV, 3 OH)
Vilas had 19 from serve-volley points -
- 8 first volleys (6 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 10 second volleys (1 FHV, 5 OH, 4 BHOH)
- 1 third volley (1 BHV)
- 12 passes - 3 returns (2 FH, 1 BH) & 9 regular (6 FH, 3 BH)
- FH returns - 2 dtl
- BH return - 1 dtl
- regular FHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 longline
- regular BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out
Sadri had 6 from serve-volley points -
- 1 first volley (1 FHV)
- 4 second volleys (3 BHV, 1 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 OH)
- 7 passes - 5 returns (5 BH) & 2 regular (1 FH, 1 BH)
- BH returns - 3 cc, 2 inside-in
- regular FH - 1 dtl
- regular BH - 1 longline/down-the-middle (a net chord pop over)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Vilas 19
- 4 Unforced (3 FHV, 1 BHOH)
- 15 Forced (4 FH, 2 BH, 6 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 BHOH, 1 Back-to-Net)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.5
Sadri 34
- 13 Unforced (2 FH, 3 BH, 3 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)... with 1 BH at net
- 21 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH, 3 FH1/2V, 4 BHV, 1 OH)... the OH was on the bounce, from the baseline pass attempt against an at net smash
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for this match are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Vilas was...
- 61/89 (69%) at net, including...
- 60/85 (71%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 46/59 (78%) off 1st serve and...
- 14/26 (54%) off 2nd serve
---
- 5/11 (45%) forced back
Sadri was...
- 43/73 (59%) at net, including...
- 39/65 (60%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 24/35 (69%) off 1st serve and...
- 15/30 (50%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 retreated
Match Report
Serve-volley match, Vilas is at least good in all areas (and more than that in some), Sadri is poor sans the serve and lobs. Unfortunately for him, Vilas is exceptionally good on the smash off both wings to render Sadri’s lob based return game ineffective. Punched volleys don’t go through the court the way they typically do at Wimbledon, and there’s occasional bad bounce
31 winners, 19 errors (4 UEs, 15 FEs) for Vilas. To go with healthy 32% freebies. First rate figures. He’s well in the positives on the volley, on the pass and gets better of baseline rallies (there aren’t many)
Serve clicks and he swings and swerves the first shot about, almost always to weak Sadri BH. Serve-volleys 100% of the time. Doesn’t err on the volley and though not faced with many difficult ones, is excellent when he is. The only real danger is Sadri’s excellent lobs
Sadri lob vs Vilas smash (both wings) is defining point of the match. Sadri’s passing is weak, but his under-the-ball lobs are excellent. Vilas’ smash though is better still and he comes away with 9 smash winners (5 OH, 4 BHOH)
BHOH isn’t an every match shot and BHOH winners tend to be rare. A player having 2 in a match is blue moon + goldust rare - and I don’t recall ever seeing someone with 3
Vilas has 4 winners with it here, along with a UE and an FE. Fully extended jumping shots, with no question of them being just a high BHV. 4-6 other times he uses the shot
He’s also forced back from net 11 times. Given his ability to make fully stretched out, jumping, back-pedalling smashes off both wings, if he’s forced back, the lob has to be perfect. On top of all those forced back points, many of Vilas smash winners are very difficult, potential winning lobs by Sadri, but Vilas is too good on the smashes
Rest of Sadri’s passing arsenal is below part, but those lobs are potentially match winning. All credit to Vilas for first class smashing
Sadri bombs out 49% unreturned serves, while double faulting just once
Great big serve. If Roscoe Tanner is the Ivo Karlovic of his time, then Sadri would be Milos Raonic. His serve is categorically bigger than Borg or McEnroe’s. Of size, its around 1985 Boris Becker territory. Powerful enough to jar returner with in swing zone serve
There’s not a whole lot else he does well though. Much of it is downright poor even
He misses some very easy volleys
His placement of volleys is average (and Vilas is extremely quick)
He misses most not-easy (as opposed to hard) volleys
His BH return is weak (and Vilas serves there 85% of the time)
His passing is weak (he’s got 2 winners, 12 FEs - and 1 of the winners is a lucky net chord pop over)
He’s no genius either. How quickly he comes in behind serves varies, with little relation to how big the serve is; sometimes he’s well up at net, sometimes barely half-way to service line. Looks more like a novice trying things out than calibrated decision making
And even more strangely, he usually stays on the baseline when lobbing Vilas back to baseline. When he comes in, almost always wins the point with easy volley putaway, but majority of time, stays where he’s at, Vilas runs down ball and puts it back in play - and now they’re in a neutral baseline rally
Couldn’t ask for an easier approach than when Vilas is chasing the ball with his back to the net. Against an opponent whose virtually full serve-volleying, so presumably, happy at net. At least once, he stays back as Vilas retrieves the ball, and then tries to manufacture approach on the next shot. Wouldn’t it be easier to just come in as Vilas is heading back?
Its not a uniform match. In first set, both players win 42 points, with Vilas serving 45 of them
Break points read Vilas 1/2 (1 game), Sadri 1/3 (2 games)
Next 2 sets, Vilas wins 52 points, Sadri 39. Break points - Vilas 3/7 (3 games), Sadri 0
There’s more than 1 rain delay after the first set. Sadri doesn’t seem tired at all, but perhaps a little temperamental in blowing hot and cold, or not upto maintaining a high standard of play for very long. In other words, his level falling looks more like weak mentality than conditioning
Commentary makes the briefest possible mention of Sadri having played earlier in the day, a half-line throwaway comment. Do not say how long he’d been playing but seem confident he’s fit enough not to be much of a factor. They considerable time draw attention to how long Vilas takes between points and how he tends to keep Sadri waiting after change-overs. They’re not wrong. By standards of the time, Vilas takes long time between points, though probably usually within allotted 30 seconds. Amusingly to modern ears, they point out Sadri towelling off between a point as unusual, though they seem to feel he’s doing it to throw Vilas off during tiebreak. He only does it 2-3 times all match
Vilas’ serve game
100% serve-volleying from Vilas and 85% of his serves go to Sadri’s BH
Serves with decent power and typical lefty shape. Placement is good. He has safety cushion of Sadri not being able to punish weaker serves too
6 aces or 9% of first serves (Sadri has 19%)
4 doubles or 13% of second serves (Sadri has 3%)
For him, a reputed average server, not bad. Starts the match double faulting regularly, it doesn’t get him broken and for most of match, second serve is very reliable
Wins 78% first serve-volley points and 54% second serve-volley ones, so serve quality is a factor for him. In that light, first serve serve percentage is important for him. He manages a very good 68%
Sadri mostly dabs BH returns, looking to touch them wide and low (in that order). Rarer attempts to rip returns usually miss. When they land in, Vilas is very good at making the tough volley neatly. Some combo of extra powerful, low-ish and wide returns are plucked back in play, almost without strain. To be clear, such exchanges are rare
Bulk is Sadri dabbing at returns. Still misses a good deal. Along with rest of his play, seems to have mental lapses when returning is particularly loose
Vilas punching the FHV firmly. It doesn’t go through the court too well. Better BHV which he comes under more
Lot of easy volleys which Vilas putsaway or gets wide. Misses little, without necessarily putting away ball for sure winner. Sadri’s passing is not powerful or precise, so again, some safety cushion for volleying quality for Vilas
Vilas was the defending champion and this would be his second and last title at the event. This would be Sadri’s only Slam final
Vilas won 96 points, Sadri 81
Vilas serve-volleyed off all serves, Sadri off all but 7 (3 firsts, 4 seconds) serves
Serve Stats
Vilas...
- 1st serve percentage (65/95) 68%
- 1st serve points won (52/65) 80%
- 2nd serve points won (14/30) 47%
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (30/95) 32%
Sadri...
- 1st serve percentage (47/82) 57%
- 1st serve points won (35/47) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (17/35) 49%
- Aces 8 (1 possibly not clean), Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (40/82) 49%
Serve Patterns
Vilas served...
- to FH 13%
- to BH 85%
- to Body 2%
Sadri served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 7%
Return Stats
Vilas made...
- 41 (12 FH, 29 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 3 Winners (2 FH, 1 BH)
- 31 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH), a runaround FH
- 30 Forced (15 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (41/81) 51%
Sadri made...
- 61 (4 FH, 57 BH)
- 5 Winners (5 BH)
- 24 Errors, all forced...
- 24 Forced (4 FH, 20 BH)
- Return Rate (61/91) 67%
Break Points
Vilas 4/9 (4 games)
Sadri 1/3 (2 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Vilas 31 (8 FH, 4 BH, 7 FHV, 3 BHV, 5 OH, 4 BHOH)
Sadri 18 (2 FH, 6 BH, 3 FHV, 4 BHV, 3 OH)
Vilas had 19 from serve-volley points -
- 8 first volleys (6 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 10 second volleys (1 FHV, 5 OH, 4 BHOH)
- 1 third volley (1 BHV)
- 12 passes - 3 returns (2 FH, 1 BH) & 9 regular (6 FH, 3 BH)
- FH returns - 2 dtl
- BH return - 1 dtl
- regular FHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 longline
- regular BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out
Sadri had 6 from serve-volley points -
- 1 first volley (1 FHV)
- 4 second volleys (3 BHV, 1 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 OH)
- 7 passes - 5 returns (5 BH) & 2 regular (1 FH, 1 BH)
- BH returns - 3 cc, 2 inside-in
- regular FH - 1 dtl
- regular BH - 1 longline/down-the-middle (a net chord pop over)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Vilas 19
- 4 Unforced (3 FHV, 1 BHOH)
- 15 Forced (4 FH, 2 BH, 6 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 BHOH, 1 Back-to-Net)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.5
Sadri 34
- 13 Unforced (2 FH, 3 BH, 3 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)... with 1 BH at net
- 21 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH, 3 FH1/2V, 4 BHV, 1 OH)... the OH was on the bounce, from the baseline pass attempt against an at net smash
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for this match are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Vilas was...
- 61/89 (69%) at net, including...
- 60/85 (71%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 46/59 (78%) off 1st serve and...
- 14/26 (54%) off 2nd serve
---
- 5/11 (45%) forced back
Sadri was...
- 43/73 (59%) at net, including...
- 39/65 (60%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 24/35 (69%) off 1st serve and...
- 15/30 (50%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 retreated
Match Report
Serve-volley match, Vilas is at least good in all areas (and more than that in some), Sadri is poor sans the serve and lobs. Unfortunately for him, Vilas is exceptionally good on the smash off both wings to render Sadri’s lob based return game ineffective. Punched volleys don’t go through the court the way they typically do at Wimbledon, and there’s occasional bad bounce
31 winners, 19 errors (4 UEs, 15 FEs) for Vilas. To go with healthy 32% freebies. First rate figures. He’s well in the positives on the volley, on the pass and gets better of baseline rallies (there aren’t many)
Serve clicks and he swings and swerves the first shot about, almost always to weak Sadri BH. Serve-volleys 100% of the time. Doesn’t err on the volley and though not faced with many difficult ones, is excellent when he is. The only real danger is Sadri’s excellent lobs
Sadri lob vs Vilas smash (both wings) is defining point of the match. Sadri’s passing is weak, but his under-the-ball lobs are excellent. Vilas’ smash though is better still and he comes away with 9 smash winners (5 OH, 4 BHOH)
BHOH isn’t an every match shot and BHOH winners tend to be rare. A player having 2 in a match is blue moon + goldust rare - and I don’t recall ever seeing someone with 3
Vilas has 4 winners with it here, along with a UE and an FE. Fully extended jumping shots, with no question of them being just a high BHV. 4-6 other times he uses the shot
He’s also forced back from net 11 times. Given his ability to make fully stretched out, jumping, back-pedalling smashes off both wings, if he’s forced back, the lob has to be perfect. On top of all those forced back points, many of Vilas smash winners are very difficult, potential winning lobs by Sadri, but Vilas is too good on the smashes
Rest of Sadri’s passing arsenal is below part, but those lobs are potentially match winning. All credit to Vilas for first class smashing
Sadri bombs out 49% unreturned serves, while double faulting just once
Great big serve. If Roscoe Tanner is the Ivo Karlovic of his time, then Sadri would be Milos Raonic. His serve is categorically bigger than Borg or McEnroe’s. Of size, its around 1985 Boris Becker territory. Powerful enough to jar returner with in swing zone serve
There’s not a whole lot else he does well though. Much of it is downright poor even
He misses some very easy volleys
His placement of volleys is average (and Vilas is extremely quick)
He misses most not-easy (as opposed to hard) volleys
His BH return is weak (and Vilas serves there 85% of the time)
His passing is weak (he’s got 2 winners, 12 FEs - and 1 of the winners is a lucky net chord pop over)
He’s no genius either. How quickly he comes in behind serves varies, with little relation to how big the serve is; sometimes he’s well up at net, sometimes barely half-way to service line. Looks more like a novice trying things out than calibrated decision making
And even more strangely, he usually stays on the baseline when lobbing Vilas back to baseline. When he comes in, almost always wins the point with easy volley putaway, but majority of time, stays where he’s at, Vilas runs down ball and puts it back in play - and now they’re in a neutral baseline rally
Couldn’t ask for an easier approach than when Vilas is chasing the ball with his back to the net. Against an opponent whose virtually full serve-volleying, so presumably, happy at net. At least once, he stays back as Vilas retrieves the ball, and then tries to manufacture approach on the next shot. Wouldn’t it be easier to just come in as Vilas is heading back?
Its not a uniform match. In first set, both players win 42 points, with Vilas serving 45 of them
Break points read Vilas 1/2 (1 game), Sadri 1/3 (2 games)
Next 2 sets, Vilas wins 52 points, Sadri 39. Break points - Vilas 3/7 (3 games), Sadri 0
There’s more than 1 rain delay after the first set. Sadri doesn’t seem tired at all, but perhaps a little temperamental in blowing hot and cold, or not upto maintaining a high standard of play for very long. In other words, his level falling looks more like weak mentality than conditioning
Commentary makes the briefest possible mention of Sadri having played earlier in the day, a half-line throwaway comment. Do not say how long he’d been playing but seem confident he’s fit enough not to be much of a factor. They considerable time draw attention to how long Vilas takes between points and how he tends to keep Sadri waiting after change-overs. They’re not wrong. By standards of the time, Vilas takes long time between points, though probably usually within allotted 30 seconds. Amusingly to modern ears, they point out Sadri towelling off between a point as unusual, though they seem to feel he’s doing it to throw Vilas off during tiebreak. He only does it 2-3 times all match
Vilas’ serve game
100% serve-volleying from Vilas and 85% of his serves go to Sadri’s BH
Serves with decent power and typical lefty shape. Placement is good. He has safety cushion of Sadri not being able to punish weaker serves too
6 aces or 9% of first serves (Sadri has 19%)
4 doubles or 13% of second serves (Sadri has 3%)
For him, a reputed average server, not bad. Starts the match double faulting regularly, it doesn’t get him broken and for most of match, second serve is very reliable
Wins 78% first serve-volley points and 54% second serve-volley ones, so serve quality is a factor for him. In that light, first serve serve percentage is important for him. He manages a very good 68%
Sadri mostly dabs BH returns, looking to touch them wide and low (in that order). Rarer attempts to rip returns usually miss. When they land in, Vilas is very good at making the tough volley neatly. Some combo of extra powerful, low-ish and wide returns are plucked back in play, almost without strain. To be clear, such exchanges are rare
Bulk is Sadri dabbing at returns. Still misses a good deal. Along with rest of his play, seems to have mental lapses when returning is particularly loose
Vilas punching the FHV firmly. It doesn’t go through the court too well. Better BHV which he comes under more
Lot of easy volleys which Vilas putsaway or gets wide. Misses little, without necessarily putting away ball for sure winner. Sadri’s passing is not powerful or precise, so again, some safety cushion for volleying quality for Vilas