Mats Wilander beat Vitas Gerulaitis 6-3, 6-3, 4-6, 6-4 in the French Open quarter-final, 1982 on clay
The unseeded Wilander would go onto win the title, beating Guillermo Vilas in the final and become the then youngest ever Slam champion. Gerulaitis was seeded 5th
Wilander won 125 points, Gerulaitis 113
Gerulaitis serve-volleyed off most first serves and occasionally off seconds
[Note: I'm missing the ending of 2 points and have guessed serve type for a small number of points. A small number of points are missing minor, partial data such as serve direction and return data
Points with ending missing
- Set 2, Game 7, Point 2... a Wilander first serve point won by Wilander
- Set 3, Game 4, Point 2... a Wilander first serve that drew a return error (most unlikely unforced)]
Serve Stats
Wilander...
- 1st serve percentage (98/111) 88%
- 1st serve points won (62/98) 63%
- 2nd serve points won (9/13) 69%
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (16/111) 14%
Gerulaitis...
- 1st serve percentage (67/127) 53%
- 1st serve points won (51/67) 76%
- 2nd serve points won (22/60) 37%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 8
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (26/127) 20%
Serve Patterns
Wilander served...
- to FH 9%
- to BH 67%
- to Body 25%
Gerulaitis served...
- to FH 48%
- to BH 47%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Wilander made...
- 93 (43 FH, 49 BH, 1 ??), including 3 runaround BHs
- 4 Winners (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 22 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 20 Forced (7 FH, 13 BH)
- Return Rate (93/119) 78%
Gerulaitis made...
- 94 (20 FH, 70 BH, 4 ??), including 2 runaround FHs & 13 return-approaches
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 15 Unforced (3 FH, 12 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 3 return-approach attempts
- 1 Unknown (1st serve return)
- Return Rate (94/110) 85%
Break Points
Wilander 6/11 (9 games)
Gerulaitis 3/8 (5 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Wilander 38 (17 FH, 17 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
Gerulaitis 44 (6 FH, 4 BH, 14 FHV, 13 BHV, 7 OH)
Wilander had 31 passes (16 FH, 14 BH, 1 BHV)
- FH passes - 8 cc, 2 dtl (1 return), 1 inside-out return, 2 longline (1 net chord pop over) and 3 lobs
- BH passes - 2 cc, 7 dtl, 1 inside-out return, 1 inside-in return, 1 longline and 2 lobs
- regular FH - 1 inside-out at net
- regular BHs - 1 cc at net, 1 dtl at net and 1 inside-out at net
Gerulaitis had 22 from serve-volley points -
- 8 first 'volleys' (4 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 BH at net)… the BH at net was a drop shot
- 12 second volleys (5 FHV, 3 BHV, 4 OH)
- 2 third volleys (1 BHV, 1 OH)
- 3 from return-approach points (2 FHV, 1 OH)
- FHs - 3 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl, 1 inside-out and 1 lob
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl and 1 inside-out pass
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Wilander 42
- 22 Unforced (12 FH, 9 BH, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- 20 Forced (8 FH, 11 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.9
Gerulaitis 62
- 43 Unforced (9 FH, 25 BH, 3 FHV, 6 BHV)
- 19 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH, 7 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 2 BHOH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.3
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Wilander was...
- 12/22 (55%) at net, with...
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Gerulaitis was...
- 76/130 (58%) at net, including...
- 49/69 (71%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 42/54 (78%) off 1st serve and...
- 7/15 (47%) off 2nd serve
---
- 7/13 (54%) return-approaching
- 2/4 (50%) forced back/retreated
Match Report
A good match and a lively one with Gerulaitis taking net and Wilander staying on the baseline trying to pass him. Wilander's passing at times is exceptionally good and he comes out comfortably ahead, despite a good showing in forecourt and to lesser degree, even the baseline, from Vitas
Action can neatly be divided into two parts -
a) Baseline-to-baseline
b) Vitas at net vs Wilander on baseline
... and is simple to describe
Baseline-to-baseline starting point comprise all of Wilander's service points, most of Vitas' 2nd serves and some of the 1sts. Play is marked by who-blinks-first hitting. Wilander leads play, though not attacking, and largely keeps rallies BH-BH. Vitas push-slices his BH cc's and Wilander drives his
BH UEs read Mats 9, Vitas 25... pretty clear who gets the better of these exchanges. Nonetheless, Vitas' push-slice BH is among the most reliable I've seen. Other 1 handed, push/drive-slice BHs going up against a 2 handed drive BH encounters looks completely hopeless from the 1 handers point of view, and the UEs come quickly and predictably. This is from players like John Newcombe, Arthur Ashe and Rod Laver (who being left handed, has it even worse going up against right handers FH). By that standard, Vitas keeps the ball in play long and reliably... though the end result doesn't go his way too often
Disproportionately high number of Mats' UEs are change-up dtl or longline shots. It'd be an exaggeration to call them 'attacking' shots... he doesn't hit hard enough to overly trouble the fleet footed Vitas
By contrast, Vitas actually has consistency advantage on FH, making 9 UEs to Mats' 12. Again, high lot of change-up extra wide hit shots among Mats' errors. Vitas is either unable or unwilling to orchestrate play to keep things FH-FH and bulk or rallies stay BH-BH, to Mats' advantage
Mats' hitting rarely rises above neutral. Early on, he hits a bit harder, encouraging Vitas to fall back. Certainly not pushing him back, let alone hammering him down. Otherwise, very much neutral, keep-ball-in-play hitting by Mats
All 4 of Mats' non-pass groundstroke winners are net shots. Vitas by contrast has 5 baseline-to-baseline winners (a couple of them from well inside court). He also rarely goes for a attacking shots from the back. Outlasted from the back, Vitas' potential escape is coming to net, but...
Vitas at net, Mats on baseline - doesn't exactly work out well for him either. Rallying to net, he wins just 20/48 or 42%. And that's with the number going up over the match. After winning first 2 points of the match by coming in, he goes on a 1/16 run rallying to net that lasts to almost the end of second set.
As for serve-volleying, Vitas does so -
- 86% of the time off first serves, winning 78% of those points. Staying back, he wins 56%
- 29% of the time off 2nd serves, winning 47% of those points. Staying back, he wins 41%
Return-approaching, he's 7/13 or 54%... mostly against first serves. Mats only misses 13 first serves all match, but his first serve is just a point starter and very much chip-chargeble
If these figures are saying anything, its that Vitas would be best served to come to net as soon as possible - off the serve and off the return. He does so behind first serve all match and frequency of second serve-volleying and return-approaching increases as match goes on
This is the best serving I've seen from Vitas. Even on the slow clay, he regularly has Mats lunging and jumping to make returns. Lunging and jumping yes, missing returns, no and Mats still returns at 78%, leaving Vitas work to do on the volley
The unseeded Wilander would go onto win the title, beating Guillermo Vilas in the final and become the then youngest ever Slam champion. Gerulaitis was seeded 5th
Wilander won 125 points, Gerulaitis 113
Gerulaitis serve-volleyed off most first serves and occasionally off seconds
[Note: I'm missing the ending of 2 points and have guessed serve type for a small number of points. A small number of points are missing minor, partial data such as serve direction and return data
Points with ending missing
- Set 2, Game 7, Point 2... a Wilander first serve point won by Wilander
- Set 3, Game 4, Point 2... a Wilander first serve that drew a return error (most unlikely unforced)]
Serve Stats
Wilander...
- 1st serve percentage (98/111) 88%
- 1st serve points won (62/98) 63%
- 2nd serve points won (9/13) 69%
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (16/111) 14%
Gerulaitis...
- 1st serve percentage (67/127) 53%
- 1st serve points won (51/67) 76%
- 2nd serve points won (22/60) 37%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 8
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (26/127) 20%
Serve Patterns
Wilander served...
- to FH 9%
- to BH 67%
- to Body 25%
Gerulaitis served...
- to FH 48%
- to BH 47%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Wilander made...
- 93 (43 FH, 49 BH, 1 ??), including 3 runaround BHs
- 4 Winners (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 22 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 20 Forced (7 FH, 13 BH)
- Return Rate (93/119) 78%
Gerulaitis made...
- 94 (20 FH, 70 BH, 4 ??), including 2 runaround FHs & 13 return-approaches
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 15 Unforced (3 FH, 12 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 3 return-approach attempts
- 1 Unknown (1st serve return)
- Return Rate (94/110) 85%
Break Points
Wilander 6/11 (9 games)
Gerulaitis 3/8 (5 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Wilander 38 (17 FH, 17 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
Gerulaitis 44 (6 FH, 4 BH, 14 FHV, 13 BHV, 7 OH)
Wilander had 31 passes (16 FH, 14 BH, 1 BHV)
- FH passes - 8 cc, 2 dtl (1 return), 1 inside-out return, 2 longline (1 net chord pop over) and 3 lobs
- BH passes - 2 cc, 7 dtl, 1 inside-out return, 1 inside-in return, 1 longline and 2 lobs
- regular FH - 1 inside-out at net
- regular BHs - 1 cc at net, 1 dtl at net and 1 inside-out at net
Gerulaitis had 22 from serve-volley points -
- 8 first 'volleys' (4 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 BH at net)… the BH at net was a drop shot
- 12 second volleys (5 FHV, 3 BHV, 4 OH)
- 2 third volleys (1 BHV, 1 OH)
- 3 from return-approach points (2 FHV, 1 OH)
- FHs - 3 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl, 1 inside-out and 1 lob
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl and 1 inside-out pass
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Wilander 42
- 22 Unforced (12 FH, 9 BH, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- 20 Forced (8 FH, 11 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.9
Gerulaitis 62
- 43 Unforced (9 FH, 25 BH, 3 FHV, 6 BHV)
- 19 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH, 7 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 2 BHOH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.3
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Wilander was...
- 12/22 (55%) at net, with...
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Gerulaitis was...
- 76/130 (58%) at net, including...
- 49/69 (71%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 42/54 (78%) off 1st serve and...
- 7/15 (47%) off 2nd serve
---
- 7/13 (54%) return-approaching
- 2/4 (50%) forced back/retreated
Match Report
A good match and a lively one with Gerulaitis taking net and Wilander staying on the baseline trying to pass him. Wilander's passing at times is exceptionally good and he comes out comfortably ahead, despite a good showing in forecourt and to lesser degree, even the baseline, from Vitas
Action can neatly be divided into two parts -
a) Baseline-to-baseline
b) Vitas at net vs Wilander on baseline
... and is simple to describe
Baseline-to-baseline starting point comprise all of Wilander's service points, most of Vitas' 2nd serves and some of the 1sts. Play is marked by who-blinks-first hitting. Wilander leads play, though not attacking, and largely keeps rallies BH-BH. Vitas push-slices his BH cc's and Wilander drives his
BH UEs read Mats 9, Vitas 25... pretty clear who gets the better of these exchanges. Nonetheless, Vitas' push-slice BH is among the most reliable I've seen. Other 1 handed, push/drive-slice BHs going up against a 2 handed drive BH encounters looks completely hopeless from the 1 handers point of view, and the UEs come quickly and predictably. This is from players like John Newcombe, Arthur Ashe and Rod Laver (who being left handed, has it even worse going up against right handers FH). By that standard, Vitas keeps the ball in play long and reliably... though the end result doesn't go his way too often
Disproportionately high number of Mats' UEs are change-up dtl or longline shots. It'd be an exaggeration to call them 'attacking' shots... he doesn't hit hard enough to overly trouble the fleet footed Vitas
By contrast, Vitas actually has consistency advantage on FH, making 9 UEs to Mats' 12. Again, high lot of change-up extra wide hit shots among Mats' errors. Vitas is either unable or unwilling to orchestrate play to keep things FH-FH and bulk or rallies stay BH-BH, to Mats' advantage
Mats' hitting rarely rises above neutral. Early on, he hits a bit harder, encouraging Vitas to fall back. Certainly not pushing him back, let alone hammering him down. Otherwise, very much neutral, keep-ball-in-play hitting by Mats
All 4 of Mats' non-pass groundstroke winners are net shots. Vitas by contrast has 5 baseline-to-baseline winners (a couple of them from well inside court). He also rarely goes for a attacking shots from the back. Outlasted from the back, Vitas' potential escape is coming to net, but...
Vitas at net, Mats on baseline - doesn't exactly work out well for him either. Rallying to net, he wins just 20/48 or 42%. And that's with the number going up over the match. After winning first 2 points of the match by coming in, he goes on a 1/16 run rallying to net that lasts to almost the end of second set.
As for serve-volleying, Vitas does so -
- 86% of the time off first serves, winning 78% of those points. Staying back, he wins 56%
- 29% of the time off 2nd serves, winning 47% of those points. Staying back, he wins 41%
Return-approaching, he's 7/13 or 54%... mostly against first serves. Mats only misses 13 first serves all match, but his first serve is just a point starter and very much chip-chargeble
If these figures are saying anything, its that Vitas would be best served to come to net as soon as possible - off the serve and off the return. He does so behind first serve all match and frequency of second serve-volleying and return-approaching increases as match goes on
This is the best serving I've seen from Vitas. Even on the slow clay, he regularly has Mats lunging and jumping to make returns. Lunging and jumping yes, missing returns, no and Mats still returns at 78%, leaving Vitas work to do on the volley