Mats Wilander vs Andy Murray: Revisiting the classic debate.

[Sport]

For the majority of Wilander's career there was no Olympic tennis so you can't fairly use that achievement of Murray's in a h2h comparison.

There is no universe where you can make an argument with a straight face that Murray is the greater player than Wilander. Wilander won 3 majors in one season, a feat no-one achieved again until Federer in 2004.

That's why I said "according to Fedjokodal". I do not share his opinion.

 

[King No1e]

That's why I said "according to Fedjokodal". I do not share his opinion.

Fedalovic flows better than Fedjokodal.

 

[BGod]

Beating 1983 McEnroe on grass at AO and Cash in 1988 AO were two other very strong victories. Cash just coming off a 1987 AO final and 1987 Wimbledon title, and McEnroe in peak form in 1983/1984.

I was refering to those finals he won on his way in the draw. Of course his win against Cash in 88 is waaaaaay up there.

 

[IowaGuy]

I was refering to those finals he won on his way in the draw. Of course his win against Cash in 88 is waaaaaay up there.

Wow, just checked the Cash-Wilander H2H, Cash really had the upper hand before 1988 AO, winning their prior 4 GS encounters!