Raul_SJ
G.O.A.T.
Youre right that Wimbledon has a lot to answer for, but pretty much all the big events do, along with many of the smaller events.
Not singling out Wimbledon. The wild card needs to be abolished in London, Paris, NYC and Melbourne.
In the end, the organisers were vindicated in the specific case of Raducanu because she took her wildcard and made a big run at the event. She played way better than her ranking suggested and played superb tennis up until the match against Tomljanovic.
That is more of a reflection on the state of the WTA. You can choose most any low-ranked player and they will have a decent chance of an upset. It does not legitimize the WC process.
She had never even faced a Top 100 player prior to Wimbledon so it is absurd that she qualifies for a tournament consisting almost exclusively of the world's Top 100 players.
A struggling #200 player should not be bypassed in favor of a #500 player that happens to hail from the right country. We believe that players must qualify based upon their merits -- on their ranking.
Last edited:
