JustMy2Cents
Hall of Fame
Gilles Simon joins Daniil’s team
New ball girl as well
New ball girl as well

Simon was a high IQ longtime professional. As a coach, why would he only be capable of helping a player implement strategies that he often implemented himself as a player? Certainly he is capable of assessing any player's skillset and helping them determine what they need to do to become more successful.Simon is not who Medvedev needs unless he’s suddenly an expert on attacking tennis, which is what Medvedev lacks and needs to incorporate more imho, esp. as the 6’ 6” Russian gets into his late 20s & 30s. It’s like, “Hmmm… which types of players, gamestyles, tennis histories, etc. should I avoid?”
A. Stefan Edberg
B. Mischa Zverev
C. Sergiy Stakhovsky
D. Gilles Simon
Daniil is already pretty accomplished attacking when he wants to … it’s making that choice that is most difficult for him. AO final he bosses Jannik for the first two sets with some aggressive ground and net play. Surprised most with it.Simon is not who Medvedev needs unless he’s suddenly an expert on attacking tennis, which is what Medvedev lacks and needs to incorporate more imho, esp. as the 6’ 6” Russian gets into his late 20s & 30s. It’s like, “Hmmm… which types of players, gamestyles, tennis histories, etc. should I avoid?”
A. Stefan Edberg
B. Mischa Zverev
C. Sergiy Stakhovsky
D. Gilles Simon
One would hope that Simon could help Medvedev implement tactics that he himself (whether or not he was as high IQ as you say)Simon was a high IQ longtime professional. As a coach, why would he only be capable of helping a player implement strategies that he often implemented himself as a player? Certainly he is capable of assessing any player's skillset and helping them determine what they need to do to become more successful.
Monfils, Murray and Med are bigger and stronger and their lack of aggressive play has hurt them. When you're smaller and you redline, on average you make more errors than you can overcome with points won from being aggressive. Maybe Simon played just right to have a successful, consistent career. He was never going to win a major.One would hope that Simon could help Medvedev implement tactics that he himself (whether or not he was as high IQ as you say)
failed to as a player. My reasoning to oppose hiring Simón is pretty simple. Simon failed tactically to find the balance to maximize his talents imo, which were considerable. Sure, he beat Rafa & Federer once iirc and had Djoko 2 sets to love once and lost….relying on memory here. Overall, though, Simon had the Monfils, Murray tendency of being too passive, not aggressive enough, something that Medvedev cannot continue to do if he wants to thrive. Just saying Simón is example of failed tactics imo.
Will make Djokovic hit 120 UEs in their next AO meeting and still lose the matchwill simon will help medvedev with the aesthetics of his game, or the other way around?![]()
Professional tennis players understand the game beyond their own personal playing styles.Not a big fan. It’s like Djokovic hiring Agassi who was pretty much just the previous gen’s Djokovic, a baseliner with a GOAT level return. What could he possibly learn?
Djokovic ramped up his game in the later years by hiring Ivanisevic to improve his serve and overall aggression.
Medvedev just hired another ball-machine. What can Simon offer Medvedev that he doesn’t already have?