27CCan you translate that temperature limit to common-sense normal Celsius degrees?
The data shows that 85 degrees is right in Med’s sweet spot.85 degrees, hardly 50% of humidity and the sun will have disappeared at 4:30 pm. I wouldn't call it "hot" conditions. Conditions were much more extreme in Tokyo and Medvedev was also struggling if I recall correctly. The match against Nishikori started 4 hours earlier in comparison, he was bothered by the shadows but it won't be the case at 4:30.I doubt it'll be a determining factor.
85 degrees, hardly 50% of humidity and the sun will have disappeared at 4:30 pm. I wouldn't call it "hot" conditions. Conditions were much more extreme in Tokyo
Much better nothing. He got demolished in AO.
looks like he is dying lol. He couldn't handle the heat. Fognini could have taken him out.
Much better nothing. He got demolished in AO.
Fognini was struggling too. And we know that guy has mentality of a chump.Thought he might be making drama, since he won the match. But maybe he was really struggling.
26-29 Celsius. It's hot but not blazing.What's the temperature going to be at 4pm?
26-29 Celsius. It's hot but not blazing.
In AO, it was about 90 F in quarters and semis, when Med destroyed Rublev and Tsits in straights.Much better nothing. He got demolished in AO.
The sample size is 49 matches total, with 11 to 13 matches in each of the 4 bars. The difficulty of competition was about equal for both players, because the data are from the same tournaments for both players, and the temperature was about the same for both players when the players were playing the same round.You have to factor in opponents as well, I should think. That could significantly bias things if Med was playing more scrubs in the heat.
Did you make it though, OP? If so, impressive and thanks for the effort.
FYI, since I published the data, Vegas betting has been huge on Medvedev. 59% of all wagers to date on Med, per Sportsbooks Review.This is what you do when you slice and dice the data until you see one way to bring up hope.
Unfortunately OP, Djokovic is a way better player than Med in BO5
Fahrenheit makes so much more sense than Celsius it's not even funny.Can you translate that temperature limit to common-sense normal Celsius degrees?
Heavy betting on Med continues, now 60% of all wagers.FYI, since I published the data, Vegas betting has been huge on Medvedev. 59% of all wagers to date on Med, per Sportsbooks Review.
Where did you pick up this data? How many matches did each play in 80+? Which ones? The sample is pretty small, so if Djoko played say 3 matches in 80+ and those were in the last week as a slam, whereas Medv. played 3-4 matches in the first week, then that pretty much nullifies the data. In other words: More context please
ExactlyYou have to factor in opponents as well, I should think. That could significantly bias things if Med was playing more scrubs in the heat.
The sample size is 49 matches total, with 11 to 13 matches in each of the 4 bars. The difficulty of competition was about equal for both players, because the data are from the same tournaments for both players, and the temperature was about the same for both players when the players were playing the same round.
To put this chart into perspective, a Return Points Ratio of 1.5 in a slam tournament is about the level of a typical slam quarterfinalist.
A ratio of 2.2 is higher than 2006 Federer.
From what I’m reading Novak is a 70% favoriteHeavy betting on Med continues, now 60% of all wagers.
Med's 2-7 in best of five - vs. Djoko's 35-10 or 23-5 since the start of 2011How many five set matches has Med even played?
Our Djoker is king of five set matches.
That 60 % of the money is put on Medvedev doesn't mean Vegas and the market sees Med as the favorite. It merely means that they see Medvedev as less of an underdog than the initial odds have suggested he is. @travlerajmFrom what I’m reading Novak is a 70% favorite
That's an interesting point I didn't knowIn AO, it was about 90 F in quarters and semis, when Med destroyed Rublev and Tsits in straights.
But it dropped to about 60 F in final against Djok.
Heavy betting on Med continues, now 60% of all wagers.
FYI, since I published the data, Vegas betting has been huge on Medvedev. 59% of all wagers to date on Med, per Sportsbooks Review.
Happy to provide some details:Where did you pick up this data? How many matches did each play in 80+? Which ones? The sample is pretty small, so if Djoko played say 3 matches in 80+ and those were in the last week as a slam, whereas Medv. played 3-4 matches in the first week, then that pretty much nullifies the data. In other words: More context please
Exactly
But bookies take that into account in setting odds, and aim for 50/50. 60% is big disparity and gives the bookies a huge liability.This is because tournament metrics to date point to Medvedev being in significantly stronger form. But most people don't consider that a factor and expect Djokovic to come out guns blazing.
Now up to 62% of wagers on Med! Still climbingBut bookies take that into account in setting odds, and aim for 50/50. 60% is big disparity and gives the bookies a huge liability.
I am saying that the betting pattern changed overnight, and almost everyone is going all in on Med in the last 8h.
Yeah, that's why even scientists use Celsius in your country. To make science even more harder because why not.Fahrenheit makes so much more sense than Celsius it's not even funny.
No it doesn'tFahrenheit makes so much more sense than Celsius it's not even funny.
Can you translate that temperature limit to common-sense normal Celsius degrees?
Generally 0 is the low end and 100 is the top end.No it doesn't
Fahrenheit was a very poorly-designed scale. Fahrenheit was created with the intent being "OK, so 0 is the coldest it's ever been around here—about as cold as this brine mixture I made to represent it—and the human body is naturally at 100. OK, based on that scale, water freezes at 32 and boils at 212, interesting... that'll probably be easier to replicate than human body temperature." It turned out his brine wasn't fully mixed and would stabilize at -3°, so eventually they had to recalibrate this based on water's freezing point instead. It reeks of bad craft, but he was the guy who invented the mercury thermometer, so that's why it caught on.Generally 0 is the low end and 100 is the top end.
It's the same simplicity of the metric system you guys always brag about.
Measuring things on a scientific scale like for freezing point or boiling point makes more sense in celsius.Yeah, that's why even scientists use Celsius in your country. To make science even more harder because why not.
If he dies tonight, blood is on your handsMedvedev “if I die on the court it’s your fault” in 90 F and 70% humidity is going to outlast Djokovic in similar conditions?
Don’t make me laugh.
65% and climbing!HEAVY betting on Med this morning continues:
Now up to 63% of all wagers on Medvedev!