So I have demo'd quite a few rackets. Dunlop AG 100, roddick gt, yonex rqis 1tour, wilson ktour (davenport one), nadal racket,youtek radical, and verdasco's technifibre. Not suprisingly I like the youtek radical. I haven't given the pro version a shot but I don't think I will like the bigger head. "Not suprising" because I came from a LM radical MP which I have been using for a while. I don't know if that immediate comfort is good or bad. Im switching because I was just sold a broken austrian made frame from a guy in Canada. The austrian version is hard to come by nowadays. I only have one austrian which is too annoying to be worth living with. The China one doesn't play the same way. Anyways . . . my impression of the youtek was positive. It felt like an improved LM radical. One thing I hated about my LM was the volley'ing. Flexy frame really made it difficult. If you didn't hit it perfect . . . bad result. The stiffer youtek feels much more solid at net. Everything else is comparable. Feels like a solid all around racket. Now for the question. I have not tried a MG radical mp yet but I have seen lots of positive feedback regarding it. Many people seem to say its more solid than the youtek. Not many reviews on here about either racket so figured I would ask about your opinions. What do you think??? Microgel vs Youtek radical?? Also feel free to discuss the radical pro's as well. Thx !