Starting up USTA league with mixed 8.0 for the first time. What should I expect? Will be Northern Cali region. Will I come across a lot of sandbagging 4.5's playing 4.0? etc. etc.
Thanks
Starting up USTA league with mixed 8.0 for the first time. What should I expect? Will be Northern Cali region. Will I come across a lot of sandbagging 4.5's playing 4.0? etc. etc.
Thanks
I played 8.0 mixed this year and it was the worst league I've ever experienced. My final record was 1-7. I'm a middling 3.5 and I was partnered with weak 3.5 women the whole time. Mostly played strong 4.0 guys with 4.0 women.
I wouldn't consider playing it again until I'm a 4.0 myself some day. I wouldn't mind playing with a 4.5 woman, but those are just so hard to find nowadays in my area.
I don't mind losing in a fair fight... but...
Starting up USTA league with mixed 8.0 for the first time. What should I expect? Will be Northern Cali region. Will I come across a lot of sandbagging 4.5's playing 4.0? etc. etc.
Thanks
Starting up USTA league with mixed 8.0 for the first time. What should I expect? Will be Northern Cali region. Will I come across a lot of sandbagging 4.5's playing 4.0? etc. etc.
Thanks
Starting up USTA league with mixed 8.0 for the first time. What should I expect? Will be Northern Cali region. Will I come across a lot of sandbagging 4.5's playing 4.0? etc. etc.
Thanks
Why would you bring a 7.0 team to an 8.0 match and have any expectation other than to get beat ?
you two should find a 7.0 team next year (if neither gets bumped) and your record will probably be 7-1![]()
I wasn't the captain, I'm at his or her mercy when it comes to who I'm paired with.
Also another thing to keep in mind: if anyone is considering to play 8.0 mixed, look at the roster first. see how many potential pairings add up to 8.0. If the captain has fielded a roster that is 7.5 or worse, then I'd suggest finding another team to play on.
Unless, of course, you're in it just to hit and have fun. Then more power to you! But if you want to make it to the championships... I guess it's all a matter of perspective.
In my experience the best teams have always been 2 solid 4.0s because both can "handle" the 4.5s pace and spin. Even if it's just for a few shots, usually it's enough to eventually direct the ball to the 3.5f. Even a strong 4.5 (not saying I am one, but again just my opinion) will have trouble dominating a solid 4.0 pair. But, if you're a 4.5m and you're lucky enough to have a very strong 3.5f that's probably going to get bumped you're not going to lose too many matches. I came across a team like that in playoffs and we got clobbered.
Good luck!
Mixed 8.0 is an interesting league. I played a few seasons as a 4.5 and these are just my opinions only. I don't think you'll see a huge number of sandbagging 4.5s, as most of the ones I know don't enjoy playing 8.0.
The gap in skill between a typical 4.5 male and 3.5 female is huge. The 3.5 female may defer too much to the male, no matter how much you encourage her to go after shots. It's tough to rush the net because it's not too difficult to get a ball over the head or past the female and once that happens you're toast. So, you end up playing in no man's land in order to cover as much court as possible.
In my experience the best teams have always been 2 solid 4.0s because both can "handle" the 4.5s pace and spin. Even if it's just for a few shots, usually it's enough to eventually direct the ball to the 3.5f. Even a strong 4.5 (not saying I am one, but again just my opinion) will have trouble dominating a solid 4.0 pair. But, if you're a 4.5m and you're lucky enough to have a very strong 3.5f that's probably going to get bumped you're not going to lose too many matches. I came across a team like that in playoffs and we got clobbered.
Good luck!
I see this as a huge problem with combined mixed (7.0, 8.0, 9.0). USTA does not allow a 1.0 differential when playing women's or men's leagues. But for some reason, they allow a 3.5 woman to play against a 4.5 man in combined mixed; this isn't fair or fun and could be unsafe.
Another thing I see at some clubs is, the 4.5 guys will play with 3.5 ladies and now the 4.0 guys won't play, so they go to the 7.0 teams and play with 3.0 ladies. This is fine for social/club events but c'mon, how can a 4.5, or 4.0 guy think this is competitive.
All USTA has to do is change Mixed leagues to single ratings, (3.0-4.5). If like in all other seasons, a player wants to play .5 up, great, at least this won't allow players to play down a level.
I don't disagree with your recommendation, but the USTA does actually allow 1.0 differential in Senior/55+ and other combo leagues, so mixed being a "combo" league is consistent with that.
But I'd change the recommendation to still keep it a combo league but just require that doubles pairings be at adjacent levels (0.5 differential). I'd actually be ok with the female being 1.0 above the male, but some may not like the asymmetry with having a special clause like that.
The fundamental issue is that a 4.0 man and 4.0 women are not at equivalent skill levels. It is generally accepted that there is about a 0.5 difference between men and women, such that a 4.0 women is at a similar skill level to a 3.5 man, so by allowing a 1.0 difference with the male being the higher level, it is effectively a 1.5 rating or really 3 level difference. This is where it isn't consistent with the Senior/55+ or other combo leagues that are just men or women.
--
NTRP Ratings FAQ
I still think if they set up mixed where the woman has to be 0.5 levels above the man (e.g. 7.5 mixed with a 4.0 woman and 3.5 man on each team) would be the most fun.
I still think if they set up mixed where the woman has to be 0.5 levels above the man (e.g. 7.5 mixed with a 4.0 woman and 3.5 man on each team) would be the most fun.
Starting up USTA league with mixed 8.0 for the first time. What should I expect? Will be Northern Cali region. Will I come across a lot of sandbagging 4.5's playing 4.0? etc. etc.
Thanks
USTA does have offer combo mixed. It's big in our area. 5.5 through 9.5 or 10.5 levels. Ever thought about starting a combo mixed league in your area?
I've never heard of it. I don't think it's offered here, and I don't personally have any sort of connections to start any sort of USTA league on my own, the best I could hope for would be to aim an email at the right person about it I think. Does the woman have to be 0.5 above the man by rule, unless playing up, in these leagues?
But for some reason, they allow a 3.5 woman to play against a 4.5 man in combined mixed; this isn't fair or fun... ...how can a 4.5, or 4.0 guy think this is competitive.
So another solution would be to have a universal rating, not one for men and one for women. Then a 4.0 is a 4.0 regardless of gender
the real solution is to make a 4.0 a 4.0 regardless of gender.
We have it here, in the late summer.
It is not my favorite kind of mixed. As a 4.0, I do not feel ready for 8.5 mixed combo, so that leaves 7.5. I have to play with a 3.5 guy, and that is kind of weird. They can be really inconsistent and powerful at the same time, which is scary.
I may try again later this summer, maybe.
We have it here, in the late summer.
It is not my favorite kind of mixed. As a 4.0, I do not feel ready for 8.5 mixed combo, so that leaves 7.5. I have to play with a 3.5 guy, and that is kind of weird. They can be really inconsistent and powerful at the same time, which is scary.
I may try again later this summer, maybe.
This makes so much sense. Which of course means that the USTA will never consider it![]()
This only works when there are a theoretical unlimited supply of players in both genders at each level. Around here, there wouldn't be enough 4.0 or higher women to even have a league at these levels. I played 8.0 mixed and I was able to overpower 4.5 women as a 4.0.
I think you're saying that you're for the status quo because if you as a 4.0 male could only play mixed with women who are at the same absolute level as you, then you don't think there would be enough women to make this work? You postulate that you are at or above the level of what is currently considered a 4.5 woman. So you'd only be able to play mixed with what are now high 4.5 or 5.0 women, of which there aren't many.
Ok, but under the status quo, if you think you a 4.0 male is stronger than a 4.5 woman, what do you imagine to be the gap between a 4.5 male and a 3.5 woman? How is that imbalance in any way conducive to good tennis?
As an aside, I think you might be underestimating women players. I regularly hit with a 5.0, and she gives me a run for my money (I'm a middle of the road 4.5 male). And I know several 4.5 women who I'd put money on vs the average 4.0 in singles. In general I think the gap is about 0.6 NTRP.
Why not 4.5 women to even with 4.0 men?
What area is this and how would the different ratings translate at nationals? I ask because I'm about to play a 8.0 mixed league here. We will have a state and I assume a sectionals and nationals. Is this usta Cindy?