He really loved the Diadora B Icon which is a light speed shoe.Great shoe review. He seems to have a slight preference for heavy stability shoes. Still not sure how I will like the 5s, but I love the 4s.
He really loved the Diadora B Icon which is a light speed shoe.Great shoe review. He seems to have a slight preference for heavy stability shoes. Still not sure how I will like the 5s, but I love the 4s.
Based on Foot Doc Zach's review and my experience with the Wave 4s - these do not seem like they are going to work for me.
Great shoe review. He seems to have a slight preference for heavy stability shoes. Still not sure how I will like the 5s, but I love the 4s.
He really loved the Diadora B Icon which is a light speed shoe.
I've come to realize that if he hates a shoe I may like a lot. He hated the Mizuno 4s, I love them. Called the original Asics Court FF one of the worst shoes ever, and I thought it was one of the best. Also I can't understand his sizing recommendations - it seems every single shoe gets the same treatment: "It will fit narrow, medium and wide feet, but for 2E you might just want to go up a half size." Seems to say this for every single shoe and there is no chance some of those shoes worked on my wider foot when I tried them on, half size up or not.
I like he has a method to his madness. He tests shoes well and gives interesting feedback to how he feels he performs with said shoe. He talks about the material shoes are made of and how he feels it will perform. He mentions drop at least indirectly. He tests material for durability.
I dislike his sizing advice as it does seem to really help or relate to how I see shoes. I didn't notice weight being mentioned. Basically he likes a very stable shoe as far as I can tell. He likes inserts in a good number of shoes. I was that way a long time ago now I prefer a well fit lighter shoe with a more neutral feel and room for my wider forefoot while being locked in well.
Unfortunately, the only way to really know is to get a shoe and play in it. Not as easy as it used to be when shoes have gotten both hard to find and more expensive.
which video does he say this in? Did he take it down? I have these still unusedCalled the original Asics Court FF one of the worst shoes ever
which video does he say this in? Did he take it down? I have these still unused
Dude I have the FF1s and I don't find anything wrong with them. He rates the FF2s as the best shoe right now (along with the Raptors) so I wonder what the differences are. Never tried the FF2sIt was in a casual chat/interview with him done by another tennis youtuber, not in a review. I can't remember the video or source exactly.
Any further experiences with these?
And mainly: is everyone staying in the same size as the 4s or actually sizing down? I ask because I'm a 44/10.5US in the 4s, which fit me a little long but the overall shoe locks me in enough (with aftermarket insole) where I'm good to go, not slipping, width more accommodating. But some people have reported this one to be an even wider foot, or softer in the uppers, which makes me wonder if the 44/10.5US would be too big in these and i should size down if indeed these are at all more generous either in length or width.
Really love the 4s. Seems they're all gone now in my size.
I have had a pair for about 1 month now:
I'm a US 11. Ordered the same size before the TW review suggesting to go down 0.5 size. Glad I got the same size b/c it doesn't feel long, and I think my toes would've been cramped w/ a 10.5.
Very lightweight, nimble shoe. Despite the hard outsole, they feel grippy on the court. Easy to slide on hardcourt, though very squeaky/loud. Cushioning seems thin, but don't hurt my feet after playing for a couple of hours (I use orthotics).
Looking forward to a new pair if I can wear through the outsole w/in the 6-month warranty period.
Overall, I'm very pleased w/ the 5 (I usually favor Adidas shoes), and I don't think I'll go back to a heavy model after this.
Unfortunately, I didn't have the 4s, so I can't compare.Pretty great you’re able to slide on HC as that’s the one thing I would change on the 4s (and 5s seem to have the same outsole): that extreme stickiness I seem to find which prevents me from finding those slide-stops on HC that I can get easily with Asics. Others seem to find this as well with the Mizunos, so you sliding on HC so early, you must be a fast mover/good technique or have slicker courts? Anyway, thanks for the feedback. I’m still wondering whether I’ll need to go down a half size from the 4s or not but it sounds like you didn’t have the 4s.
At home trying on the 5’s right now with the 4’s on the other foot. Same size (10.5) but I like the 4’s better and the 4’s have many many hours on them. 5’s are slightly wider and lighter, but the upper is more flimsy. If I put the same Cadence insole in the 5, my heel slips out. Side to side, the upper of the 5 doesn’t hold up and it’s just too flimsy. Could be due to the wider fit that I’m feeling from the 5. Regardless, open stance groundstrokes recovery steps feel way more stable/faster in the 4’s (I think it’s called the slalom, idk) I’m not bothered by the tongue of the 5 but I like the extra cushioning of the traditional tongue in the 4.
Fit on the 5 is generous. I have a somewhat wide foot and I can actually splay my toes. These would be great for walking tbh
Cushioning underfoot is similar
Looks I guess are cooler (I have the white blue orange 4’s, and the white blue 5’s)
I’m also trying the Revolt Evo’s since the Pro’s aren’t in stock right now. Those are better than the 5’s but I like these 4’s the best. The Evo’s have too much mesh on the lateral side of the upper and the recovery is eh.
I might wait for the Pro’s but these 4’s are almost through.
I like these better than that Wave exceed tour 4 because they ride a little lower to the ground and I can feel the court better and feel much faster. The 4's were 5 percent more comfortable just walking around but the on court performance wasn't nearly as good because they were bulkier and sat up higher. I am rotating these and the Ubersonic 4, and the zoom NXT. but am finding myself reaching for these more often. The ubersonic 4 Clay have the better traction on clay. The zoom NXT looks the best. but the exceed tour 5 win in every other category. looking forward to more colors.
411 => they are a whopping five grams less than the 4s–in my size US11.5–but yet so much more flimsy, it should be at least twenty grams lighter. But it's not <shrug>.But the 5s feel like racing slippers, insanely light,
I am really enjoying the mizunos and they are very comfortable. I have 2-3 cons with the shoes.
1. Soles are too grippy. I know strange, but when I want to slide, I feel like I am about to trip as it grips the courts too well.
2. The laces are super super long. I had to cut them short.
3. This may be a pro or con, but I am only about 6? 7? weeks in and I have already almost worn through the forefoot sole.
But these are probably my new favorite shoes. Close second would be the Babolat Jet Mach 3. I may need to do a thorough side by side comparison of the 2. I am coming from Nike 9.5s and 10s.
I like these better than that Wave exceed tour 4 because they ride a little lower to the ground and I can feel the court better and feel much faster. The 4's were 5 percent more comfortable just walking around but the on court performance wasn't nearly as good because they were bulkier and sat up higher. I am rotating these and the Ubersonic 4, and the zoom NXT. but am finding myself reaching for these more often. The ubersonic 4 Clay have the better traction on clay. The zoom NXT looks the best. but the exceed tour 5 win in every other category. looking forward to more colors.
After playing in the 5s again I have to say this is spot on - the stability and cushioning comfort a bit better in the 4s, but not huge; court feel much better with these. I just realized those Zoom NXTs are said to have a roomier fit, possibly for wide feet. True? The Mizuno 5s are super for my wider foot.
The zoom NXT's are a medium/wide-ish fit but the Upper on the exceed tour 5's are more stretchy/elastic so they feel roomier.
And sounds like you much prefer the Mizunos?
Anybody use inserts with this? The factory insert is too thin. I usually use an insert with the 4’s but my heel sits too high with the same insert in the 5’s. Not looking for much of a cushioned one but one that’s subtle with good arch support
Anybody use inserts with this? The factory insert is too thin. I usually use an insert with the 4’s but my heel sits too high with the same insert in the 5’s. Not looking for much of a cushioned one but one that’s subtle with good arch support
Where did you wear through? Uppers or sole? If it was the sole, I bet the toe area wore through on one side.I like these shoes. They feel fast, and make a lot of noise on the court the first week or so. They lasted about 6-7 weeks, which is standard for me. Mizuno warrantied quickly and without any trouble.
Where did you wear through? Uppers or sole? If it was the sole, I bet the toe area wore through on one side.
I have slightly wider feet but fits into usual size, US 8.5. It is a little long but still works well. No experience with Yonex shoes I am afraid.are these Exceed 5 tru-to-fit? Like let's say compared to Yonex shoes - do you wear the same size?