Modern 95" rackets: thoughts and Ideas

I can understand that. My favorite 18x20 that I've used is the Vcore pro 97D. I really enjoy that racket and the accuracy it provides but I couldn't get as much shape/spin on ground strokes and the serve wasn't as effective. Majority of my play is green clay! Unbelievable slice though on that frame. I bet the Cx200 and MP produces a majestic slice
one of my favorite things about them !
 
Just took all my 95s out (minus the Vcore) and had a nice session. Also was able to hit the Wilson Blade 16x19, New Solinco Whiteout V2, and New Gravity Tour as my friend was demo-ing those frames. Everytime I hit with a 98 I am reminded why I love the 95s so much. So much more stable and predictable in almost every regard. My Prince ATS 95 played and felt more solid than all of those frames while having almost the same size sweet spot, launch angle, and spin. The Prince is such a unique frame to me. It doesn't really feel like a 95 in any capacity other than the stamp on the side. Still love the frame

The Prestige Tour 2023 was head and shoulders above all of the frames in every category except spin production. More and more impressed with this frame every time I use it. The slice is majestic like an 18x20 and every shot looks the same. The rally ball is in the same window with the same spin everytime. Just doesnt seem to produce those outlier shots that launch funny or over/under spin. Direct 1 to 1 ratio of what you put in you get out.
 
Only problem with the TK291 mold (95" 22mm) is the more classic oval shape is kind of showing its age. If you hit with even moderate swipe and a bit higher in the string bed, as most tend to do these days, myself included, the swiping window is fairly narrow between 10 and 2 — I shank noticeably more with this frame than with certain others like the VC95, though the VC95's string bed is less consistent. So it's all a game of trade-offs.
 
Only problem with the TK291 mold (95" 22mm) is the more classic oval shape is kind of showing its age. If you hit with even moderate swipe and a bit higher in the string bed, as most tend to do these days, myself included, the swiping window is fairly narrow between 10 and 2 — I shank noticeably more with this frame than with certain others like the VC95, though the VC95's string bed is less consistent. So it's all a game of trade-offs.
VC95 i shanked more than any frame i’ve ever played. 22mm 95” prestige included.
 
Interesting that you'd shank more with the VC95 in the 10-to-2 area. What do you think it was? Frame just not coming through contact as predictably, or in as compatible a way with your mechanics, versus the Prestige? Or something else?
 
Interesting that you'd shank more with the VC95 in the 10-to-2 area. What do you think it was? Frame just not coming through contact as predictably, or in as compatible a way with your mechanics, versus the Prestige? Or something else?
not sure. beam and frame just seem so much thicker and wider on the vc95.
 
Interesting that you'd shank more with the VC95 in the 10-to-2 area. What do you think it was? Frame just not coming through contact as predictably, or in as compatible a way with your mechanics, versus the Prestige? Or something else?
Im curious about this as well. My thoughts would be maybe the weighting is different, more or less HL, and so the strings are getting to the ball sooner or later than you're used to
 
Im curious about this as well. My thoughts would be maybe the weighting is different, more or less HL, and so the strings are getting to the ball sooner or later than you're used to
It also might depends on generation: the 2015 SV and 2018 shanked more from being slightly narrower up top, less so the beam thickness; the current 2023 maybe from being a bit wider-beamed, less so constricted in swiping space. The 2021 between both ends of the spectrum. But we're somewhat splitting hairs between all the molds.
 
It also might depends on generation: the 2015 SV and 2018 shanked more from being slightly narrower up top, less so the beam thickness; the current 2023 maybe from being a bit wider-beamed, less so constricted in swiping space. The 2021 between both ends of the spectrum. But we're somewhat splitting hairs between all the molds.
That's so interesting that it was consistent thru all the models and that @AndrewUtz experience the same. I certainly didn't find that with the 21 or 23. I didn't gel with them as much as other frames but it wasn't due to shanking.
 
That's so interesting that it was consistent thru all the models and that @AndrewUtz experience the same. I certainly didn't find that with the 21 or 23. I didn't gel with them as much as other frames but it wasn't due to shanking.
tbf, i played it for maybe 10 minutes. immediate bad first impression. and if it’s an immediate bad first impression i don’t typically tend to play with them any longer.
 
tbf, i played it for maybe 10 minutes. immediate bad first impression. and if it’s an immediate bad first impression i don’t typically tend to play with them any longer.
Usually know pretty quickly if has potential or not, especially if ball coming off graphite Lol
 
I am using the Prince ATS 95 and is wonderful all rounder. For the OHBH is sublime, great stability and comfort. Great control on the FH and good placement on serves
I also own a Wilson 6.1 95, Prince Tour 95
 
I am using the Prince ATS 95 and is wonderful all rounder. For the OHBH is sublime, great stability and comfort. Great control on the FH and good placement on serves
I also own a Wilson 6.1 95, Prince Tour 95
I agree with you wholeheartedly. Excellent comfort and spin while still doing everything else well. Very good on the 1hbh! What strings and tension do you use? I've been hitting with Lynx Tour 1.25 at 50 and it's a crisp combo
 
I agree with you wholeheartedly. Excellent comfort and spin while still doing everything else well. Very good on the 1hbh! What strings and tension do you use? I've been hitting with Lynx Tour 1.25 at 50 and it's a crisp combo
i am using the Solinco Hyper G 1.25 24/23 kgs and also TruPro (Tier One) Black Knight 1.25 same tension.
Kind of leaning towards Solinco Hyper G
 
Regarding shanks, are you guys doing this off returns or off even regular groundies? No shame off of returns because returning is the hardest. If you are shanking off returns, probably even a 98 or 100" sized head won't help much.
 
Regarding shanks, are you guys doing this off returns or off even regular groundies? No shame off of returns because returning is the hardest. If you are shanking off returns, probably even a 98 or 100" sized head won't help much.
Bumping this thread with a reply to this. For me, most of my 10 & 2 shanks with the TK291 come most often on extreme eastern forehand groundies, usually when I'm fully extended or stretched, and I'm anything more than a fraction of a second early or late on contact.

That said, I fully well know the above is more a "me problem" than the racquet, but the more tightened oval shape certainly exposes this issue for me more so than frames offering more space in the 10 & 2 area, ie. the 97" Yonex mold and most any modern-shaped 98 and up.
 
Can I just say a heartfelt thank you to everyone, and especially @ChaseS. for starting this thread.

I just posted about string setups for the Auxetic Prestige Tours in another thread.

I love these frames and after trying a bunch of others I am very nearly resigned to playing with them forever.

PSVS, VC95, Percepts were all contenders but nothing beats that sweet PT feel. Especially for a OHBH.

I’m a 37yo predominately flat hitting all court 4.5+ player, OHBH. But use a lot of spin on serve and bh slice. The PTs are just dreamy. I have 2021 and 2023 closely matched.

Only issue is… deep in 2nd set, break point, on the back foot - I just needed a touch power and forgiveness. Hence the journey of exploration.

TL;DR is I’ve lost the leather grips and dropped from 348g static to 336g and thinner strings - now trying softer set ups than the low power control strings I typically prefer.

1.20 MSV focus hex soft @45lbs is working lovely, in the other I’m rotating different poly hybrids using Hawk Power @ 43-45lbs.

Instant depth and spin increase but enough control to nail a flat drive. Experimentation continues - but would love to know what works for others.

Also, sounds like I now need to source an Angell TC95 and maybe a Cx200, lol. Thanks
 
Regarding shanks, are you guys doing this off returns or off even regular groundies? No shame off of returns because returning is the hardest. If you are shanking off returns, probably even a 98 or 100" sized head won't help much.
returns. stretching to hit something with a crazy western grip occasionally sends some balls flying. I’m not even going to blame it on PWS, it’s me. I’m not trying to get mad at the racquet, I’d go find an old CX Tour then as a replacement, and I’m done spending money on other racquets.
 
Bumping this thread with a reply to this. For me, most of my 10 & 2 shanks with the TK291 come most often on extreme eastern forehand groundies, usually when I'm fully extended or stretched, and I'm anything more than a fraction of a second early or late on contact.

That said, I fully well know the above is more a "me problem" than the racquet, but the more tightened oval shape certainly exposes this issue for me more so than frames offering more space in the 10 & 2 area, ie. the 97" Yonex mold and most any modern-shaped 98 and up.
Did the Vcore 95 remove this issue for you? That one has the same extra space at 10 & 2 as the bigger racquets, just less near the throat. The Prince 95 also is more short mains, wide head but more towards 3 & 9.
 
Prestige Tour 95: Precision, repeatable, controlled, dependable, classy, crisp, stable, lower launch, best slice, tighter pattern for 16m,

Angell Tc95: Plush, solid, stable, pro stock feel, higher launch, exciting, string sensitive, poor grommets, open pattern for 16m

Vcore 95: softer, muted, comfortable, ball pocketing, stable with weight, 2nd best slice, lower launch, infinite string options

Prince ATS 95: flexible, ball pocketing, raw feel comfortable, SPINNY, chaotic, intriguing, higher launch, infinite string options

I may edit as things pop into my head but that's a good start. Love to know what you all think of these frames and happy to field any questions. They are all wonderful frames and super fun to use despite being so different. Long live the 95"!!
Since I've recently acquired and tested a Prince ATS 95 I can now compare all of them as well. Only exception is that I haven't tried the Vcore 95 with my usual VS gut 1.30 / Hawk Rough 1.30 setup.
Very nice description overall.

I have bascially the same order on Control and precision as you. The first two Prestige Tour and Vcore95, rather close between those two. \
Then with some margin Prince and Angell Tc95 but it's a toss up between the two. Due to the shorter mains of the Prince, it feels a bit more controlled with gut/poly.
With full poly I might reverse the order.

I would also say launch angle would follow that same order with Prestige lowest and Prince highest.
Agree.

Spin would inverse that order with the Prince wayyyyyy out front of the rest. Prestige at the bottom of spin list but still is very spin friendly and produces heavy ball. The Prince is far and beyond the spinniest racket I've owned and it has a wildness to it that is fun.
I think Prince and Angell are very close in that department. Since the Prince is lower powered it's a bit easier to get a really spinny ball.
No issues for spin with the other two either.

Sweet spot size would go to Prince and Angell both having massive sweet spots for 95" frames. Makes perfect sense with the more spread out drill patterns.
Yeah, Prince sweet spot feels wider due to the frame geometry, Angell more sweet spot vertically.
The Vcore sweet spot is pretty big too, Prestige not lacking either.


Feel wise, Prestige, Angell and Prince in the top 3, hard to rank them, they are all nice in different ways. Yonex in the clear last spot, I don't dislike it but nothing great about the feel.

Some extra thoughts on all four frames.

Prestige Tour 95: Not the best feeling Prestige but the most solid. Can do everything in my opinion and works for every style of play.

Angell TC95: Explosive, something about the grommets + open pattern gives this a lot of power. Amazing serving racquet, best of those 4.
I wish this would come in a more middle of the road string pattern as there's either the very open 16x19 or the very dense 18x20. Review here is about 63 RA 16x19 of course. There is also a 70 RA version but the feel isn't as nice and comfort might be an issue, just got the 70RA one a few weeks back and haven't tested it properly.

Vcore 95: meh feel but very good all around performance. SW too low stock.

Prince ATS 95: Most of the power comes from open the string pattern, the frame itself feels very soft and controlled. SW too low stock. Currently playing with this to see if it could be an option in the long run.
 
Since I've recently acquired and tested a Prince ATS 95 I can now compare all of them as well. Only exception is that I haven't tried the Vcore 95 with my usual VS gut 1.30 / Hawk Rough 1.30 setup.
Very nice description overall.

I have bascially the same order on Control and precision as you. The first two Prestige Tour and Vcore95, rather close between those two. \
Then with some margin Prince and Angell Tc95 but it's a toss up between the two. Due to the shorter mains of the Prince, it feels a bit more controlled with gut/poly.
With full poly I might reverse the order.


Agree.


I think Prince and Angell are very close in that department. Since the Prince is lower powered it's a bit easier to get a really spinny ball.
No issues for spin with the other two either.


Yeah, Prince sweet spot feels wider due to the frame geometry, Angell more sweet spot vertically.
The Vcore sweet spot is pretty big too, Prestige not lacking either.


Feel wise, Prestige, Angell and Prince in the top 3, hard to rank them, they are all nice in different ways. Yonex in the clear last spot, I don't dislike it but nothing great about the feel.

Some extra thoughts on all four frames.

Prestige Tour 95: Not the best feeling Prestige but the most solid. Can do everything in my opinion and works for every style of play.

Angell TC95: Explosive, something about the grommets + open pattern gives this a lot of power. Amazing serving racquet, best of those 4.
I wish this would come in a more middle of the road string pattern as there's either the very open 16x19 or the very dense 18x20. Review here is about 63 RA 16x19 of course. There is also a 70 RA version but the feel isn't as nice and comfort might be an issue, just got the 70RA one a few weeks back and haven't tested it properly.

Vcore 95: meh feel but very good all around performance. SW too low stock.

Prince ATS 95: Most of the power comes from open the string pattern, the frame itself feels very soft and controlled. SW too low stock. Currently playing with this to see if it could be an option in the long run.
Interested in you tc95 70ra review
 
Since I've recently acquired and tested a Prince ATS 95 I can now compare all of them as well. Only exception is that I haven't tried the Vcore 95 with my usual VS gut 1.30 / Hawk Rough 1.30 setup.
Very nice description overall.

I have bascially the same order on Control and precision as you. The first two Prestige Tour and Vcore95, rather close between those two. \
Then with some margin Prince and Angell Tc95 but it's a toss up between the two. Due to the shorter mains of the Prince, it feels a bit more controlled with gut/poly.
With full poly I might reverse the order.


Agree.


I think Prince and Angell are very close in that department. Since the Prince is lower powered it's a bit easier to get a really spinny ball.
No issues for spin with the other two either.


Yeah, Prince sweet spot feels wider due to the frame geometry, Angell more sweet spot vertically.
The Vcore sweet spot is pretty big too, Prestige not lacking either.


Feel wise, Prestige, Angell and Prince in the top 3, hard to rank them, they are all nice in different ways. Yonex in the clear last spot, I don't dislike it but nothing great about the feel.

Some extra thoughts on all four frames.

Prestige Tour 95: Not the best feeling Prestige but the most solid. Can do everything in my opinion and works for every style of play.

Angell TC95: Explosive, something about the grommets + open pattern gives this a lot of power. Amazing serving racquet, best of those 4.
I wish this would come in a more middle of the road string pattern as there's either the very open 16x19 or the very dense 18x20. Review here is about 63 RA 16x19 of course. There is also a 70 RA version but the feel isn't as nice and comfort might be an issue, just got the 70RA one a few weeks back and haven't tested it properly.

Vcore 95: meh feel but very good all around performance. SW too low stock.

Prince ATS 95: Most of the power comes from open the string pattern, the frame itself feels very soft and controlled. SW too low stock. Currently playing with this to see if it could be an option in the long run.
Beautifully said. Well done. The Prince for its weight, is very unstable feeling to me. The Vcore95 is similar. The Prestige Tour on the other hand maybe the most solid and stable racket I've used. Handles any sort of pace and spin with authority and great at the net. The more I use it, the larger the gap grows between it and the rest of the 95s lol
 
Reading this thread is triggering my holicism more than anything.

I was a longtime Prince Ignite 95 user as a junior and have always felt the smaller head size is more natural to swing!

Used the Prince TT95 and ATS95, which were both excellent, agree with everything said above.

The Vcore95 2023 was a little too unstable against big hitting, but I think I served better with it than any racket I’ve ever used, it has ridiculous pop near the top of the hoop and a tonne of spin.

These days I’m just lost in the racket wilderness a bit, although I did just acquire one of the supposedly best 95s made, the Head Youtek IG Radical Pro (not a true 98, definitely a true 95)
 

I’m surprised not many ones, if any, mentioned the long-going series: Wilson Six.One 95. Their recent v13 & v14 offerings, with 18x20 pattern, 331g unstrung weight and 12pt HL, are just great sticks for those who are after control and feel.
 
Better late than never.


To add:
Ncode Six One 95 16x18: TC to BC = 10.4'' (26.4cm), LM to RM = 7.7'' (19.6cm)
Bumping this thread but do you happen to know the measurements for the cx 200 tour 16x19 and/or 18x20? Wonder how they would compare to the other frames you listed
 
Bumping this thread but do you happen to know the measurements for the cx 200 tour 16x19 and/or 18x20? Wonder how they would compare to the other frames you listed
I've only tried the previous cx 200 tour 16x19 for a short while and don't have it anymore. I remember the crosses being more tightly spaced towards the center but iirc the changed something there in the last version.
From pictures the 2024 crosses look similar to the prestige tour, spacing wise, but with slightly more open mains.
 
There's also the latest Ultra Tour 95 QZ available in Asia & Australia - 16x20 like the VCore 95 (and also a straight 22mm like the 2026 model) - light static weight with head heavy balance/slightly extended length to get the swingweight up into the 320s
 
Bumping this thread but do you happen to know the measurements for the cx 200 tour 16x19 and/or 18x20? Wonder how they would compare to the other frames you listed

I'm not sure if measuring the distance from the top and bottom strings means anything, since the outer 2-3 strings are moved around by manufacturers at random, and if you ever hit there the shot will be terrible. However, here is my list of the size of the central 100 cells filtered to just 95sqi rackets. My recollection is the CX 18x20 is about 1.15cm2 average cell size, and the CX 16x19 is about 1.275cm2, so relatively tight for a 16x19.

String-Cells-95s.jpg
 
Anyone know an equivalent to the K factor six one team in terms of tight, 95sqin, and sub 300g to customize to a high playability?
They are pretty easy to find I think still so maybe just get more K factor ones.
Dunlop CX 200 Tour maybe, comes with leather already so if you replace with a normal basegrip, ~305g unstrung.
Many old radicals fit the bill, the MPs usually have 295 unstrung and are 95 with a tight 18x20.
The Angell 95 18x20 would also fit your criteria.
Not many options for current sticks with those specs.
 
@Lazuras_Long any chance when you get a minute that you could get a tape and measure the drill pattern on your Dunlop 16x19?? In inches, measure top cross to bottom cross and last main on left to last main on right. Thanks!

From the photos, the pattern looks tighter like the Prestige Tour

Thank you for doing that. Thats very similar to the Prestige Tour stringbed.

Looks like we can order the drill pattern from more closed to more open like this:

Angell Tc95 18x20
Dunlop Cx200 18x20
Prestige Tour 16x19
Dunlop Cx200 16x19
Vcore 95 16x20
Angell TC95 16x19
Prince ATS 95 16x19

For the 2024 Dunlop cx 200 tour 16x19 im getting

TC > BC = 9.75 in
LM > RM = 7.375 in

I've always thought it played more spin friendly than a Vcore 95 IME.
 
Back
Top