weakera
Talk Tennis Guru
No mention of possible cancellation or delay, closed door tournament on the table.
It shouldn't be played. No spectator. Might as watch the players in practice.
It shouldn't be played. No spectator. Might as watch the players in practice.
To be honest I see your point. I thought they might cancel them but it appears they desperate to still get the events played and this is the only way to do it.
I suppose it would give the 'no one loves Djokovic' memes a bit of breathing space.Will be so weird watching big tournaments without spectators, like watching challenge tour events...
0 centsThat makes exactly 0 sense.
Damn that buster and his Corona.
Will be so weird watching big tournaments without spectators, like watching challenge tour events...
Yeah, can’t imagine a Nadal-Djokovic match on empty stadium. Some new experience for everyone I guess.
The sky is falling.
And picking up their own paper towels and ballsReally ? I wonder what effect that will have on the players as there is no direct pressure of a crowd....
Gag ruleI wish crowds were never allowed into tennis events, as all they do is delay the players when trying to serve.
The more silence, the better.
Same with golf![]()
The thread title is misleading. Obviously MC isn’t announcing now the event may be cancelled. Miami is still claiming it will be played when it almost certainly will not. The MC announcement says, “if it will be played without spectators.” Larry Ellison addressed that the likelihood of any venue being played with no fans is “not happening” in tennis.
Maybe he is wrong, but he knows more about all this than any of us.
I doubt a guy who's never hit a single ball in tennis would have this kind of passion for the sportWhy is Larry more qualified than any of us? He likely hasn't hit a single ball in tennis unlike many of us who have played several competitive matches.
Watching Liverpool-ATM now and the stadium is full
It shouldn't be played. No spectator. Might as watch the players in practice.
And it's even more absurd to expect matches to be played with no one in the stands. I realize the Nadal and Djokovic fans are totally desperate for tennis to go forward (and probably furious Fed lucked out by timing his surgery to perfection), but the panic is real and events are going to be cancelled. I posted this in another thread:For those claiming that matches played with no crowd are not worth watching, that's really absurd.
But it's hundreds of people who can be accounted for and screened, and who can keep a safe distance from one another. Greatly reduces the risk compared to a crowd of tens of thousands who can't really be effectively screened and are going to be packed very close togetherAnd it's even more absurd to expect matches to be played with no one in the stands. I realize the Nadal and Djokovic fans are totally desperate for tennis to go forward (and probably furious Fed lucked out by timing his surgery to perfection), but the panic is real and events are going to be cancelled. I posted this in another thread:
As LarryEllison explained, there is no revenue for the organizers or TV if no one's in the stands. The viewing experience with no fans is nil from an advertising perspective. And in any case, just having tournament staff, lines people, chair umps, press, announcers, TV crews and locker room people entail hundreds of people being present at the venue. It's not like Novak and Rafa are going to walk on court with only 5 people surrounding them within a 3 mile radius.
Larry Ellison owns the sixth most prestigious tournament in tennis. I would strongly assume he knows what he's talking about.
And it's even more absurd to expect matches to be played with no one in the stands. I realize the Nadal and Djokovic fans are totally desperate for tennis to go forward (and probably furious Fed lucked out by timing his surgery to perfection), but the panic is real and events are going to be cancelled. I posted this in another thread:
As LarryEllison explained, there is no revenue for the organizers or TV if no one's in the stands. The viewing experience with no fans is nil from an advertising perspective. And in any case, just having tournament staff, lines people, chair umps, press, announcers, TV crews and locker room people entail hundreds of people being present at the venue. It's not like Novak and Rafa are going to walk on court with only 5 people surrounding them within a 3 mile radius.
Larry Ellison owns the sixth most prestigious tournament in tennis. I would strongly assume he knows what he's talking about.
Antagonistic goat race jokes aside, surely no tennis fan wants these events cancelled. No audience needed
Watching Liverpool-ATM now and the stadium is full![]()
For Paris-Dortmund (in Paris) there was no crowd, but numerous supporters were packed just outside the stadium like if it was the chinese subwayThe English hooligans at it again.
![]()
So it will be like most WTA matches?
Will be so weird watching big tournaments without spectators, like watching challenge tour events...
Maybe not, https://www.ljbtc.com/Beach/Weather-Tide-Beach-CamI think the most amazing thing for me will be when we have NBA games with no crowds and how they will fill the vacuum of the enormously high noise floor.
Also interested to see how they will shoot it and whether there will be any attempt to replace the visual aspect of empty seats or change the coverage angles.
I think the most amazing thing for me will be when we have NBA games with no crowds and how they will fill the vacuum of the enormously high noise floor.
Also interested to see how they will shoot it and whether there will be any attempt to replace the visual aspect of empty seats or change the coverage angles.
It shouldn't be played. No spectator. Might as watch the players in practice.
You're a Djokovic fan, so you have a horse in the field and can't see this logically. It's OK, it's a passionate issue. But if you think any tournament of consequence is being contested in the next few months, you're most likely going to be disappointed. There's a lot more things in life than Nole getting #18 or Rafa #20.But it's hundreds of people who can be accounted for and screened, and who can keep a safe distance from one another. Greatly reduces the risk compared to a crowd of tens of thousands who can't really be effectively screened and are going to be packed very close together