More On Saudis, Premier Tour, Combined Tours

marc45

G.O.A.T.
The Telegraph:

The latest Saudi Arabian venture into tennis – the 6 Kings Slam – is likely to follow a “two days on, one day off” pattern in order to save Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and the rest of the field from being punished by the official tour.

This awkward compromise typifies the arcane nature of tennis politics. Only a few weeks ago, the ATP Tour brought in rules that would strip elite players of their “Platinum Status” if they participate in unofficial events lasting “three or more consecutive days”.

But the Saudis were already well advanced with planning for the 6 Kings Slam: a Riyadh-based exhibition which is understood to offer its winner £4.8 million in prize money, with each player guaranteed to receive £1.2 million just for taking part.

So what are the organisers expected to do? The answer is simple but ingenious. They will probably split the event up so that it never runs for more than two days at a time.

Those organisers – who go by the name of the General Entertainment Authority – have already had to make a last-minute date shift because of the hip injury that Nadal suffered in the first week of the new season.

Originally, they were planning to run the 6KS this month. But urgent meetings with player agents during the Australian Open delivered a late postponement until the week starting October 14.

Again, this was a case of working around ATP regulations, because top-30 players are banned from appearing in exhibitions in the same week as Masters 1000 or ATP 500 events. The advantage of the week starting October 14 is that it only hosts two ATP 250s, the smallest category, which are afforded no such protection.

More cattle raid than frontal assault​

You can see here how the Saudis, for now, are not launching a frontal assault on tennis in the manner of LIV Golf. This event feels more like a cattle raid. And sources suggest that it is not motivated by any great desire to challenge the establishment; more a straightforward interest in running big events in Riyadh.

Furthermore, the announcement of the 6KS – which also involves Wimbledon champions Carlos Alcaraz, Australian Open champion Jannik Sinner, 2021 US Open champion Daniil Medvedev and rising Danish star Holger Rune – is moving in parallel with official negotiations with the two tours.

The WTA are still expected to announce a three-year deal to stage their finals event in Saudi Arabia in the coming days, even though the outspoken opposition voiced by legends Martina Navratilova and Chris Evert has added some uncertainty to the process.

Meanwhile, negotiations are progressing with the ATP to add Public Investment Fund (PIF) branding to four events, plus TV coverage of the Masters 1000 events. The same as-yet-unsigned deal is now thought to also include naming rights for the rankings charts for both ATP and WTA Tours.

Sources say that more Saudi exhibition events will soon be popping up, probably this year, but the next one is expected to be less controversial as it will be scheduled at the end of the official season.

At the moment, Saudi Arabia’s level of interest in tennis still looks manageable for the established authorities. But the unstated threat of a LIV Golf-style takeover has definitely stirred the pot, as far as tennis’s chaotic governance is concerned.
We are seeing plenty of urgent activity from the seven stakeholders who have spent decades wrestling for influence.

‘Premier Tour’ to fend off Saudi threat​

The most high-profile recent development involved plans for a possible new “Premium Tour”, combining the four slams with between 11 and 14 other big events – each of them to run across a 10-day period, offer equal prizemoney, and involve 96 singles players of either gender.

The details for the Premium Tour model are now being worked up by the four majors, with a view to presenting the resulting blueprint in Indian Wells in early March.
Meanwhile, the plans revealed by Telegraph Sport in September for a merger of the two tours – the ATP and the WTA – are moving forward in commercial terms, with the creation of a new combined “Ventures” operation drawing ever closer.

If nothing else, a combined ATP-WTA commercial body would make it far more difficult for the slams to cut the tours out of their embryonic “Premium Tour” model.
To clarify the small print about ATP player penalties, the “Platinum Status” referred to above is part of a tiered membership arrangement, and is required to access shares in the end-of-year bonus pool (a profit-sharing agreement which paid out almost £10 million last season) as well as pension contributions.

In practice, all the leading players have Platinum Status until such time as they decide to defy the tour. It is a way of trying to keep the workforce in line, which is tricky legally because the players count as sole traders rather than employees.











 

itrium84

Hall of Fame
Why not go back to those beautiful times of splintered field, to two completely separate tours?
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
WTA in Saudi will be fun. What will be the dress code? Anyone knows? Skirts below the knees and buttoned up tops?
Look at the girl wearing a pink outfit, it's Saudi Arabia's player Yara Alhogbani:
ASC_4802-copy-scaled.jpg


319813582_1282616079246860_6026867783703097143_n-1024x1024.jpg



Yara in a white&black outfit:
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
So the ATP wants a labour monopoly by inventing rules to stop players from earning more than what they are prepared to offer.

Isn't this what would be called union-style destruction of freedom of association if it weren't for the fact the bosses are doing it?
 

Sipho

Rookie
The Telegraph:

‘Premier Tour’ to fend off Saudi threat​

The most high-profile recent development involved plans for a possible new “Premium Tour”, combining the four slams with between 11 and 14 other big events – each of them to run across a 10-day period, offer equal prizemoney, and involve 96 singles players of either gender.

The details for the Premium Tour model are now being worked up by the four majors, with a view to presenting the resulting blueprint in Indian Wells in early March.
Meanwhile, the plans revealed by Telegraph Sport in September for a merger of the two tours – the ATP and the WTA – are moving forward in commercial terms, with the creation of a new combined “Ventures” operation drawing ever closer.

If nothing else, a combined ATP-WTA commercial body would make it far more difficult for the slams to cut the tours out of their embryonic “Premium Tour” model.
To clarify the small print about ATP player penalties, the “Platinum Status” referred to above is part of a tiered membership arrangement, and is required to access shares in the end-of-year bonus pool (a profit-sharing agreement which paid out almost £10 million last season) as well as pension contributions.

In practice, all the leading players have Platinum Status until such time as they decide to defy the tour. It is a way of trying to keep the workforce in line, which is tricky legally because the players count as sole traders rather than employees.

Andy Roddick and Jon Wertheim talked about this "Premier Tour" or "SuperTour" today...


With Jon Wertheim saying things like possibly making 3 or 4 times as much as they do now, and Roddick pointing out if they roped the slams in with it too... yeah, it seems like it's only a matter of "when."
 

Better_Call_Raul

Hall of Fame
Only a few weeks ago, the ATP Tour brought in rules that would strip elite players of their “Platinum Status” if they participate in unofficial events lasting “three or more consecutive days”.

What is platinum status?
Players are independent contractors are they not? They should be able to play wherever they wish.
And why isn't this an official tournament. The KSA can certainly afford to pay the ATP the necessary fees.
 

Rovesciarete

Hall of Fame
I don't know her but she tries to find her way in this incredible oppressive country. The ATP stars have it incomparably easier when they fly there, cash in and hop out again.
 

chjtennis

G.O.A.T.
Adding extra tournaments that is basically a tennis spectacle show, I don't disagree. They have money, they can do whatever they want with it. However, I don't want to see money controlling the politics in tennis and AO gets taken away from Australia and given to Saudi or China. Australian Open has improved so much in the last 20 years and it would be a shame it gets taken from there. Australia also has rich history in tennis but what do Saudi and China have? It would be a massive shame if the slam is given to either of those countries, not that I hate them, but because I love how the slam is run in Australia and also the history of Australian tennis.
 

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
I don't know her but she tries to find her way in this incredible oppressive country. The ATP stars have it incomparably easier when they fly there, cash in and hop out again.
Yara Alhogbani was born and raised in the USA, but plays tennis for Saudi Arabia. The Saudis have actively promoted her. Her two brothers also play tennis.
The Weekly Memo, Sept.2023:
unnamed.jpg
 
Last edited:
A

ALCARAZWON

Guest
You'd think they could find a better outfit to dress her in than that^
Very strange choice.
 
Top