Nadalgaenger
G.O.A.T.
Who wins more slams? Alcaraz OR the combined total of Medvedev, Zverev, Tsitsipas?
Who gets your bet?
Who gets your bet?
The little 3 are about to be slaughtered in the poll, aren't they?
Way too early to make a call, gentleman.Who wins more slams? Alcaraz OR the combined total of Medvedev, Zverev, Tsitsipas?
Who gets your bet?
I have a feeling everything you say is the truthThe little 3 are about to be slaughtered in the poll, aren't they?
AgreeWay too early to make a call, gentleman.
He's reached the USO quarters. That's a deep run.I love Carlos, but can we wait until he makes a deep run in the slams ? I really do think he’ll surpass all 3. Seems very evident on paper.
But too early to predict until we see real results in slams.
This is a pretty unintelligent post regardless whether it is a troll one or not.
That is offense, and misinterpreting a post by quoting it with a weird gif shows the unintelligence even more.No offense but can't be less intelligent than ascertaing objectivity on a subjective view.
Good question. I was going to say Del Ferdych but then realized they're all retired and can't catch Novak's Slam count anymore. Darn it!Djokovic vs Berdych, Del Potro, Ferrer???
It's quite worrying that this has happened to all of the three most prominent players of the nextgen on the biggest stages of the biggest tournaments. what it tells usWhat to Medvedev, Zverev and Tsitsipas all have in common? They've all lost slam finals from 2 sets to 0 up. It's not a very high bar to clear.
It tells us that Thiem is as mentally strong as Nadalovic.It's quite worrying that this has happened to all of the three most prominent players of the nextgen on the biggest stages of the biggest tournaments. what it tells us
At least Medvedev has one slam. Should give him enough confidence to believe in himself to win a couple more slams. The other 2, not as high hopes.What to Medvedev, Zverev and Tsitsipas all have in common? They've all lost slam finals from 2 sets to 0 up. It's not a very high bar to clear.
Which makes it even worse.At least Medvedev has one slam.
It's quite worrying that this has happened to all of the three most prominent players of the nextgen on the biggest stages of the biggest tournaments. what it tells us
Medvedev was one set away from winning last two slams!Anything can happen. We were projecting Tstsi/Med/Zverev to be the new dominant players 1-2 years ago and now they can't win anything. Could be someone totally unrelated to the Little 3 and WTAServereaz
You can rule Tsitipas and Zverev outHard to tell, but I can see three out of the four end up as ATGs.
This is a pretty unintelligent post regardless whether it is a troll one or not.
They'll forever be away from crossing the 6 slam border even collectively.Medvedev was one set away from winning last two slams!
Tsitsipas was a set away from FO
Zverev was a few points away from USO two years ago.
But still lost….Medvedev was one set away from winning last two slams!
Tsitsipas was a set away from FO
Zverev was a few points away from USO two years ago.
Close but no cigar is the Next Gen's motto for 4-5 years now.Medvedev was one set away from winning last two slams!
Tsitsipas was a set away from FO
Zverev was a few points away from USO two years ago.
Somehow, I had managed to forget about this pretty important detail... It really makes you goWhat to Medvedev, Zverev and Tsitsipas all have in common? They've all lost slam finals from 2 sets to 0 up. It's not a very high bar to clear.
At least Medvedev has one slam. Should give him enough confidence to believe in himself to win a couple more slams. The other 2, not as high hopes.
It does, doesn't it? It sure does.Which makes it even worse.
Theoretically, I still pencil an offensive-minded AZ without the yipes, going for his groundies and serves, as a multiple slam winner. But let's see him 1) actually play like that in a slam and 2) beat a top-10 first, not everyone gets to win a slam without facing a top-25 player.Both game and mentality wise he already looks better than the little three - no significantly weaker wing and no major weakness beyond perhaps serve consistency and lots of grit.
No.It’s all about age and timing. The new kid arriving at 2022/2023 might have come on stream just at the right time and age. Both him and Medvedev will lead the way it seems, while the other two guys might find it a little harder to keep up. Could be wrong, but let’s see.
But if he dominates the Next Gen, that already will make him better than them.At 25 Alcarazs opposition will not include Nadal Djokovic Federer . So his way to multislam winner will be easier
Alcaraz 10 plus medvedeverevpas 1.Who wins more slams? Alcaraz OR the combined total of Medvedev, Zverev, Tsitsipas?
Who gets your bet?
Alcaraz is 18 lol. In 2 years he will be world no.1 with a few slams under his belt.I agree it's too early. Alcaraz just won Miami before the age of 19, but his NextGen resume still pales in comparison to 2017 Zverev, who produced great results across all surfaces:
19 year old Zverev took Nadal to 5 sets at the AO;
20 year old Zverev beat Djokovic in the final of Rome;
20 year old Zverev lost in the final of Halle to Federer, and in five to 2016 WB finalist Raonic;
20 year old Zverev beat Federer in the final of Canada.
Alcaraz is 18 lol. In 2 years he will be world no.1 with a few slams under his belt.
the poll is betting on alcaraz winning more slams than 3 top-5 players combined? Hmm, I don't see how that can happen.Who wins more slams? Alcaraz OR the combined total of Medvedev, Zverev, Tsitsipas?
Who gets your bet?
Not like those 3 top 5 players are running the tables.the poll is betting on alcaraz winning more slams than 3 top-5 players combined? Hmm, I don't see how that can happen.