Fedinkum
Legend
Enough is enough...Stop the beating please~Zverev second serve
Enough is enough...Stop the beating please~Zverev second serve
Wow that wasn't even Nadal matchDoesn't get any prettier than this
![]()
Though I have no idea why is it hard for you to digest the truth(Federer fan maybe?), I certainly don't admire the consistency so here's little help. It might not help you, but for people who are not fanatic about the Swiss it might be useful - I am not "going around", I am responding to posts I read. I've heard people saying that Federer's backhand is aesthetically pleasing, but it's sort of a myth, and I am not talking only about the crazed fans here. I think people see his style of play as classic and beautiful(I agree of course), and think that one-handed backhands are always pretty(prejudice), they also connect beautiful classic playing styles with beautiful one-handers, so the conclusion goes => "Federer's backhand must be beautiful", while in reality it's a rather awkward shot. It might look pretty sometimes, from certain angles, but if you pay attention it is not a nice looking stroke at all - his upper body looks quite stiff while he's hitting the ball, like he has some kind of a spasm in the neck/shoulders area, his right shoulder is too high, shrugging almost, his head goes down too low, and his racket doesn't roll over the ball nicely, the impact is simple and not too fluid. Also that left arm looks odd back there, elbow, wrist and fingers are bent in an ugly way; and the arms look funny when separating, a bit like an exaggerated "here it is” gesture...thought you were trolling when you were going around saying his BH is not pretty but I feel like you’re not, otherwise I admire the consistency
As you can see, no it cannot. It seems a bit simple and limited compared to Sampras's, it's missing that beautiful long flow. Beautiful serve though.Or can it...?
![]()
Federer's serve is a swan. Elegant from the waist up but ugly legs.Or can it...?
![]()
We have a winner lolDoesn't get any prettier than this
![]()
His leg movement is where all the power comes from. I love how he launches himself straight off the ground through the swing and snaps down through it at the hip. Sampras throws his weight forward through the serve, which is ideal for S&V, but Federer throws his weight almost straight up and gets some hangtime.Federer's serve is a swan. Elegant from the waist up but ugly legs.
He looks like a baby kicking while having its nappy changed.
I find the serve the most boring shot bar none.His leg movement is where all the power comes from. I love how he launches himself straight off the ground through the swing and snaps down through it at the hip. Sampras throws his weight forward through the serve, which is ideal for S&V, but Federer throws his weight almost straight up and gets some hangtime.
Or maybe I really do think Federer's BH is a beautiful stroke, maybe not as much as Stan's BH but still up there.Though I have no idea why is it hard for you to digest the truth(Federer fan maybe?), I certainly don't admire the consistency so here's little help. It might not help you, but for people who are not fanatic about the Swiss it might be useful - I am not "going around", I am responding to posts I read. I've heard people saying that Federer's backhand is aesthetically pleasing, but it's sort of a myth, and I am not talking only about the crazed fans here. I think people see his style of play as classic and beautiful(I agree of course), and think that one-handed backhands are always pretty(prejudice), they also connect beautiful classic playing styles with beautiful one-handers, so the conclusion goes => "Federer's backhand must be beautiful", while in reality it's a rather awkward shot. It might look pretty sometimes, from certain angles, but if you pay attention it is not a nice looking stroke at all - his upper body looks quite stiff while he's hitting the ball, like he has some kind of a spasm in the neck/shoulders area, his right shoulder is too high, shrugging almost, his head goes down too low, and his racket doesn't roll over the ball nicely, the impact is simple and not too fluid. Also that left arm looks odd back there, elbow, wrist and fingers are bent in an ugly way; and the arms look funny when separating, a bit like an exaggerated "here it is” gesture...
When you watch a reversed match like the link below where Federer is left-handed and Nadal is right-handed, does it change your perception of the aesthetic value of their games? To me, a right-handed Nadal’s shots suddenly look prettier and a left-handed Federer doesn’t look as graceful - I guess our brains are socially conditioned to like right-handedness better.
I find the serve the most boring shot bar none.
The only shot for which you have 30 seconds.
Or in Rafa's case 50 seconds.
The only shot not dependent on what the opponent did. A shot invented to start the point but unfortunately mutated into this match-deciding ugly beast.
Mirrored Federer is awesome. As a lefty it's a lot easier to visualize and take technique pointers from his game when he's playing lefty. I've felt an actual improvement in my game when I spend some time watching mirrored Fed before hitting the practice courts.Actually Fed's strokes look great as a lefty. It reminds me of Shapovalov.
The feeling is real, I just explained where it usually comes from.Or maybe I really do think Federer's BH is a beautiful stroke, maybe not as much as Stan's BH but still up there.
![]()
Simple, elegant stroke.
I know it's all subjective, but for me Delpo's FH doesn't do it. It's like a long, winded, ugly slap at the ball. It's fun to see how much power he gets on it, but the stroke itself looks fugly.I'm truly surprised at the lack of love for Delpo's forehand.
Flat sledgehammer perfection. I remember in one match when Carillo commented on "the beautiful spacing between body and ball" after he nailed a forehand.
That description really clicked with me on why his stroke looks so glorious. It's like the Golden Ratio; it's just ... *right*.
/Acey
Is this some Wimbledon 2005 SFist?Sjeng Schalken's serve
QF, but not 2005.Is this some Wimbledon 2005 SFist?
EwwFog's BH and FH are both beautiful. I also like the aesthetic of Fog's serve, not a great serve but very smooth and elegant.
Watch him closely. His stability and footwork are exquisite when he wants to.
Novak's donut grip looks better.Federer approach shot on 40-15
No I agree completely with you lol. I just don't like my tennis very "elegant" lolWatch him closely. His stability and footwork are exquisite when he wants to.
Ok...the Italian has flairs than.No I agree completely with you lol. I just don't like my tennis very "elegant" lol
This gentleman has taste.I think Fognini has the classic beauty in his shots. Great forehand, backhand, and simple clean serve.
In combination with the swashbuckling “macho” flair. (Speed, sliding defense, athleticism, laissez faire)
In terms of shotmaking the guy is one of the most talented I’ve seen. Alas, his head is up his own ass.