Most Consecutive Big Finals Won By Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic

[McEnroeisanartist]

Was wondering what was the longest winning streak in finals of the biggest tournaments (Grand Slams, Year End Finals, and Tennis Masters) for Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic

Federer - 15- 2003 Wimbledon to 2005 US Open
6-0 in Grand Slam finals
2-0 in Year End Finals
7-0 in Tennis Masters Series Finals

Nadal - 8 - 2008 Monte Carlo to 2009 Rome
3-0 in Grand Slam Finals
5-0 in Tennis Masters Series Finals
* 1-0 in Olympics Singles Final

Djokovic - 7 - 2011 Australian Open to 2011 Canadian Open
2-0 in Grand Slam Finals
5-0 in Tennis Masters Series Finals

 

[Deleted member 688153]

Another Fed record which will never be equaled.

Good thread OP, didn't know about this one.

 

[Inanimate_object]

If I join the ATP World tour, win my first final appearance, then don't make another final until my 30s (which I also win), do I equal Federer?? C
mon now.

 

[TommyA8X]

If I join the ATP World tour, win my first final appearance, then don't make another final until my 30s (which I also win), do I equal Federer?? C
mon now.

No, because you'd still only have 2 final wins in a row. Fed has 15.

 

[SpinToWin]

If I join the ATP World tour, win my first final appearance, then don't make another final until my 30s (which I also win), do I equal Federer?? C
mon now.

Ehmmm you do know that this is about consecutive number of finals won and not consecutive years without losing a final? Not that it makes the thread any better really, cause consecutive titles is a better measure, but just saying.

Consecutive finals won is just a flawed line of logic (no offence) because it only shows how well a player performed in finals and disregards his potentially bad early round performances. Yes, that means Sampras' being undefeated in Wimby finals too.

 

[Tennis_Fever]

Ehmmm you do know that this is about consecutive number of finals won and not consecutive years without losing a final? Not that it makes the thread any better really, cause consecutive titles is a better measure, but just saying.

Consecutive finals won is just a flawed line of logic (no offence) because it only shows how well a player performed in finals and disregards his potentially bad early round performances. Yes, that means Sampras' being undefeated in Wimby finals too.

Flawed lines of logic is why TT exists and thrives sir! It's what makes it highly entertaining and extremely frustrating lol

 

[Inanimate_object]

ah I misread. But it is still amusing to think that some people spend large amounts of time thinking up every possible metric and situation to cast Federer in the most holiest of holy lights.

 

[Russeljones]

If I join the ATP World tour, win my first final appearance, then don't make another final until my 30s (which I also win), do I equal Federer?? C
mon now.

Account hacked?

 

[Deleted member 733170]

ah I misread. But it is still amusing to think that some people spend large amounts of time thinking up every possible metric and situation to cast Federer in the most holiest of holy lights.

Yet it is even more amusing that people of reasonably sound mind feel compelled to condescend authors of such topics.

 

[Boom-Boom]

Another Fed record which will never be equaled.

Good thread OP, didn't know about this one.

Pretty good one indeed