kiki
Banned
Since this is a forum to interchange well based opinions, here is my choice for the best or nicest shots I recall out of my 40 years experience with top players.
I peg pardon for all of those I´ll possibly forget.But I´d like to have the opinions of those long time tennis supporters that have, more or less, the same prime hand experience.
SERVE
1/Sampras
2/Newcombe
3/Edberg
4/Becker
5/Mc Enroe
beautiful, almost perfect textbook motions for Pete and Newc; Becker used his upper body and mighty legs to get extrapower , while I always enjoyed of Edberg´s kick and Mac´s slice were sued to settle their attack.
VOLLEY
1/Edberg/Roche/JMac
4/Rosewall/Laver
5/Panatta/Rafter
Panatta drop volleys and Rafter FH volley were great watching, so was the textbook backswing Rosewall took.Laver volley was so complete and devastating...still, Mac,Edberg and Roche had the most versatile and natural net game and, each one within his style, were a joy to watch settle the attack and knock it down
FOREHAND
1/Borg
2/Federer/Sampras
3/Bruguera/Nadal
4/Lendl
5/Courier/Newc
Borg´s top spin was great to watch because of his very personal spin, stance, hip movement and, as a resumee, his very particular style of play.
Fed´s and Pete´s are great shots, overwhelming when they are/were at their best, almost flat and with great angle.So was Lendl´s.Bruguera, Nadal ( and somewhat Courier) had a terrific top spin FH, but Bruguera´s was nicer to watch because more fluent and uncanny.
Newc´s FH approach was the best I´ve seen ( better than Pete´s or Becker´s IMO)
BACKHAND
1/Rosewall
2/Laver
3/Connors
4/Edberg
5/Ashe/Vilas/Agassi
well, the GREATEST single shot I´ve seen from the early 1970´s is the Rosewall BH.He couldn´t miss it even if he wanted to.I´ll just say that it was even nicer to " listen" to it than to watch it.Perfection, beauty, smoothness...Laver had the msot versatile Bh, could hit it in anyway, could use it to pass, come to the net, drop shot, open angles...amazing.
Ashe´s sliced was a fluent shot, and his flat one was very good.Vilas top spin one fell short only to Laver´s.
Connors has the nicest and cleanest 2 H BH ever, closely followed by Agassi.Both, the best returners of the open era ( closely followed by laver and Rosewall).Edberg´s slice approach was as good as anybody´s...and his topspin was great ( possibly, the most complete range of backhands after Laver)
LOB
1/Nastase
2/Orantes
3/Rosewall
4/Laver
5/Newcombe
lobbing isn´t a tactic anymore, since there is no volley anymore.But thsoe guys used it, both defensively and offensively with a great security margin and Nastase´s was, IMO the best, sinc ehe had that surprising loop spin, he learnt from great Manuel Santana.
DROP
1/Orantes
2/Mayer
3/Nastase/Panatta
4/Laver/Rosewall
Orantes and Mayer could hit´em anywhere, no matter what ball was coming at them.Even if you knew they were doing it, you just couldn´t reach the ball.
Connors could have been included but he lacked the proper judgement to take as much advantage of his drops as those 5 players.Nasty amd, specially Panatta, played the drop shot as an approach shot, that is, a volley settler.
OVERHEAD
1/Becker
2/Vilas/Newcombe
4/Sampras
5/Noah
Just for his almost flawless smash, Becker deserves the nº 1, but Sampras,Newcombe or Vilas never came back.I put Noah as a fifth best because of his athletic abilities.I heard of Stockton, but I can´t recall him playing, so I outed him off my list
FOOTWORK
1/Borg
2/Connors
3/Rosewall
4/Laver/Wilander
5/Federer/Nastase
I didn´t pick the fastest guy ( Gerulaitis or Kriek were the fastest probably) but , rather, the most flashy, uncanny, natural and precise footwork.Borg danced on the court, unbelievable, while Connors anticipation and hand eye coordination made him take the ball on the rise in an unmatched way.Rosewall,Mats,Federer and Nastase were very agile and precise, never wrong footing.
Laver , on the other hand, lived on his raw speed, he crossed the court like a storm and reached the most unreachable balls, something Gerulaitis and Kriek also could do, but not in such way.
As for all court game, I have no doubts that Laver has been the best I´ve seen and tha is why he ranks as my GOAT ( from 68 onwards).Not only did he have the shots and the arm and legs, he also had the boldest mind I´ve seen on court ( in his prime he went for the most unexpected shot ) combined with an uncredible strategic mind.he used the unexpected to recover and was a man you´d never know what could he bring to you
LADIES
In short, I´d say
Martina Navratilova´s serve ( and Sharapova´s and Serena´s as a second choice), Graf and Mandlikova´s FH ( closely followed by Hingis and Martinez), Evert,Henin,Seles, Sabatini and Cawley´s BH ( altough Evonne´s sliced one was just dashling, the others being powerful or ultraconsistent), Wade and Navratilova´s volley, Evert´s drop shot,Martina´s overhead and Mandlikova´s , Hingis ,Graf movement (Evert was not as good as a mover but her anticipation and concentration were first class)
The most complete player in terms of all round game would be Court,Navratilova and, then, and far from them, Hingis and Mandlikova
I peg pardon for all of those I´ll possibly forget.But I´d like to have the opinions of those long time tennis supporters that have, more or less, the same prime hand experience.
SERVE
1/Sampras
2/Newcombe
3/Edberg
4/Becker
5/Mc Enroe
beautiful, almost perfect textbook motions for Pete and Newc; Becker used his upper body and mighty legs to get extrapower , while I always enjoyed of Edberg´s kick and Mac´s slice were sued to settle their attack.
VOLLEY
1/Edberg/Roche/JMac
4/Rosewall/Laver
5/Panatta/Rafter
Panatta drop volleys and Rafter FH volley were great watching, so was the textbook backswing Rosewall took.Laver volley was so complete and devastating...still, Mac,Edberg and Roche had the most versatile and natural net game and, each one within his style, were a joy to watch settle the attack and knock it down
FOREHAND
1/Borg
2/Federer/Sampras
3/Bruguera/Nadal
4/Lendl
5/Courier/Newc
Borg´s top spin was great to watch because of his very personal spin, stance, hip movement and, as a resumee, his very particular style of play.
Fed´s and Pete´s are great shots, overwhelming when they are/were at their best, almost flat and with great angle.So was Lendl´s.Bruguera, Nadal ( and somewhat Courier) had a terrific top spin FH, but Bruguera´s was nicer to watch because more fluent and uncanny.
Newc´s FH approach was the best I´ve seen ( better than Pete´s or Becker´s IMO)
BACKHAND
1/Rosewall
2/Laver
3/Connors
4/Edberg
5/Ashe/Vilas/Agassi
well, the GREATEST single shot I´ve seen from the early 1970´s is the Rosewall BH.He couldn´t miss it even if he wanted to.I´ll just say that it was even nicer to " listen" to it than to watch it.Perfection, beauty, smoothness...Laver had the msot versatile Bh, could hit it in anyway, could use it to pass, come to the net, drop shot, open angles...amazing.
Ashe´s sliced was a fluent shot, and his flat one was very good.Vilas top spin one fell short only to Laver´s.
Connors has the nicest and cleanest 2 H BH ever, closely followed by Agassi.Both, the best returners of the open era ( closely followed by laver and Rosewall).Edberg´s slice approach was as good as anybody´s...and his topspin was great ( possibly, the most complete range of backhands after Laver)
LOB
1/Nastase
2/Orantes
3/Rosewall
4/Laver
5/Newcombe
lobbing isn´t a tactic anymore, since there is no volley anymore.But thsoe guys used it, both defensively and offensively with a great security margin and Nastase´s was, IMO the best, sinc ehe had that surprising loop spin, he learnt from great Manuel Santana.
DROP
1/Orantes
2/Mayer
3/Nastase/Panatta
4/Laver/Rosewall
Orantes and Mayer could hit´em anywhere, no matter what ball was coming at them.Even if you knew they were doing it, you just couldn´t reach the ball.
Connors could have been included but he lacked the proper judgement to take as much advantage of his drops as those 5 players.Nasty amd, specially Panatta, played the drop shot as an approach shot, that is, a volley settler.
OVERHEAD
1/Becker
2/Vilas/Newcombe
4/Sampras
5/Noah
Just for his almost flawless smash, Becker deserves the nº 1, but Sampras,Newcombe or Vilas never came back.I put Noah as a fifth best because of his athletic abilities.I heard of Stockton, but I can´t recall him playing, so I outed him off my list
FOOTWORK
1/Borg
2/Connors
3/Rosewall
4/Laver/Wilander
5/Federer/Nastase
I didn´t pick the fastest guy ( Gerulaitis or Kriek were the fastest probably) but , rather, the most flashy, uncanny, natural and precise footwork.Borg danced on the court, unbelievable, while Connors anticipation and hand eye coordination made him take the ball on the rise in an unmatched way.Rosewall,Mats,Federer and Nastase were very agile and precise, never wrong footing.
Laver , on the other hand, lived on his raw speed, he crossed the court like a storm and reached the most unreachable balls, something Gerulaitis and Kriek also could do, but not in such way.
As for all court game, I have no doubts that Laver has been the best I´ve seen and tha is why he ranks as my GOAT ( from 68 onwards).Not only did he have the shots and the arm and legs, he also had the boldest mind I´ve seen on court ( in his prime he went for the most unexpected shot ) combined with an uncredible strategic mind.he used the unexpected to recover and was a man you´d never know what could he bring to you
LADIES
In short, I´d say
Martina Navratilova´s serve ( and Sharapova´s and Serena´s as a second choice), Graf and Mandlikova´s FH ( closely followed by Hingis and Martinez), Evert,Henin,Seles, Sabatini and Cawley´s BH ( altough Evonne´s sliced one was just dashling, the others being powerful or ultraconsistent), Wade and Navratilova´s volley, Evert´s drop shot,Martina´s overhead and Mandlikova´s , Hingis ,Graf movement (Evert was not as good as a mover but her anticipation and concentration were first class)
The most complete player in terms of all round game would be Court,Navratilova and, then, and far from them, Hingis and Mandlikova