Artist
Rookie
Do you think ants perceive the world in true 3D?
and now going off topic
Do you think ants perceive the world in true 3D?
No, I am not. If you tell me you see more to tennis than the level of play, and yet you find the 2008 final overrated, I struggle to rationalize your insistence that you're qualified to comment.and now going off topic![]()
No, I am not. If you tell me you see more to tennis than the level of play, and yet you find the 2008 final overrated, I struggle to rationalize your insistence that you're qualified to comment.
Any Nadal match. His mere presence means there's no variety or strategy at all in a match.
Mugs like Tsonga and Berdych are pumped up way more by idiots like you.Safin is most overrated player all time
Safin is most overrated player all time
Probably Wimbledon F 2008
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Any Nadal match. His mere presence means there's no variety or strategy at all in a match.
Really? To me that is a match I will never forget. That match is what got me into tennis for good though, so I am biased.
Really? Who else beat peak Sampras and peak Federer to win slams?Safin is most overrated player all time
USO 13 F was sweet but that's it! AO 17 F was a classic match full of suspense right to the end.....big difference!Come on now, 2013 USO was sweet af. We love it in the same way Fed fans would love AO17.
And those who say Safin v Fed in AO 05 was overrated, no way.
Really? Who else beat peak Sampras and peak Federer to win slams?
Never beat peak Fed to win a slam.Stan more impressive fyi
USO 13 F was sweet but that's it! AO 17 F was a classic match full of suspense right to the end.....big difference!
Come on now, 2013 USO was sweet af. We love it in the same way Fed fans would love AO17.
I highly doubt that. Nadal's season was already a big success... Federer was coming back from a significant injury layoff right into his first Slam back and he hadn't won one in 4-5 years.
But regardless we never expect a HC slam out of him, least of all over Imhotep.
Why?
That doesn't mean the quality of the match was high though. The impact on Nadal and Djokovic's legacies is surely vast.
AO 17 quality wasn't better imo. Sure Fed was crispy but....
Because at the time Federer was lbeing hailed as virtually unbeatable anywhere except at the French. So to see a talented player who didn't always give 100% give 110%, to the point where he was using the breaks in between points to get his breath back, and give Federer as good as he was getting, was great to see. That was probably the first match I saw between 04-07 where Federer was made to look human and not some indestructible machine. The tennis from both players wasn't bad either.
Quality never dipped quite as low imo but didn't reach the highs. The drama was better with the fifth.
2008 Wimbledon final is the most overrated match. Roger didn't show up to play until the 3rd set, and the 5th set was decided not by the tennis, but by who had the better eyesight in the darkness.
Wow, I can't tell if this is the young Brando or Beatty.