I feel sorry for Federer never winning Rome. How can someone that good on that surface not win it. Way lesser players have won there.
It was this match alone that changed the whole format from best of five to best of three at masters.
Not the biggest fan of Andy the player, but off the court the guy is my favorite.
He’s a genuine dude, and he’s got a good heart
But it was the 2006 Rome final that started the ATP tennis bureaucracy to that end, or rather because of Nadal and Federer both pulling out of 2006 Hamburg as a result.Wasn't until the following year that the ATP moved from Bo5 to Bo3 in Masters. Djokovic and Canas actually played the last Bo5 set Masters final at 2007 Miami.
For me too!The best Fedal match
Wouldn't call it a choke. It was not like he had the match on his racquet, MP on serve.. he couldn't convert match point but it's clay God at the other end..Another choke classic
The chokemaster general choked. His specialty is choking away MPs. Don't take this away from him.Wouldn't call it a choke. It was not like he had the match on his racquet, MP on serve.. he couldn't convert match point but it's clay God at the other end..
And it’s not something you can really grasp from highlights. The Fedal rivalry at its peak was absolutely insane to go through in real time. CRAZY tennis and stakesFor me too!
I understand masters, but don't see why they had to apply that change to the YEC too. 2007 WTF was the last edition that featured a BO5 final (as well as Federer and Ferrer's only BO5 match).Wasn't until the following year that the ATP moved from Bo5 to Bo3 in Masters. Djokovic and Canas actually played the last Bo5 set Masters final at 2007 Miami.
Poor taste as usualWonderful to hear Andy's insights.
"The pirate pants? I'm not feeling them"![]()
Even worse the DC. The general trend unfortunately goes into that direction. Things like champions tie-break etc. I fear very soon we will have at least partially Bo3 at slams as well.I understand masters, but don't see why they had to apply that change to the YEC too. 2007 WTF was the last edition that featured a BO5 final (as well as Federer and Ferrer's only BO5 match).
We did have BO3 partially in the past in the early rounds of slams.Even worse the DC. The general trend unfortunately goes into that direction. Things like champions tie-break etc. I fear very soon we will have at least partially Bo3 at slams as well.
I know but it was before my time. I do not think it is great though. The more Bo5 the better.We did have BO3 partially in the past in the early rounds of slams.
They didn’t like GOATredo winning s master over StepanekBut it was the 2006 Rome final that started the ATP tennis bureaucracy to that end, or rather because of Nadal and Federer both pulling out of 2006 Hamburg as a result.
In the 1990s, the ATP would have just shrugged their shoulders in that situation and said "Well, other players have a chance in Hamburg", whereas in 2006 they seemed really bothered by Nadal and Federer not being there.
For the record, they did that at the US Open from 1975-1978 (i.e. 1977 was best of 3 sets in the first 4 rounds, and 1975, 1976 and 1978 were best of 3 sets in the first 3 rounds). It was thankfully ended.We did have BO3 partially in the past in the early rounds of slams.
That particular match wasn’t a choke imo—it was a point here, a point there.Another choke classic
Serving for match = choke. You control the ball and decide if it's ace or not. Doubly if you're serving like the Swiss.That particular match wasn’t a choke imo—it was a point here, a point there.
Fed never served for the matchServing for match = choke. You control the ball and decide if it's ace or not. Doubly if you're serving like the Swiss.
I'm sure Andy Murray can get it if he wants toHow'd they get the whole match?
Doesn't Tennis TV have it?How'd they get the whole match?
It isn't that hard if you know where to look, especially if you were around in the earlier internet years, from the late 1990s up until 2013 or so.How'd they get the whole match?
That Nadal had won 52 matches in a row on clay going into the 2006 Rome final.Peak Federer could not even beat 19yo Nadal![]()
![]()
It was so good, it deserved to be in RG!But it was the 2006 Rome final that started the ATP tennis bureaucracy to that end, or rather because of Nadal and Federer both pulling out of 2006 Hamburg as a result.
In the 1990s, the ATP would have just shrugged their shoulders in that situation and said "Well, other players have a chance in Hamburg", whereas in 2006 they seemed really bothered by Nadal and Federer not being there.
There were no fifth set tiebreaks at the French Open in those daysIt was so good, it deserved to be in RG!
Fed was amazing in 2014-2019, but he gets called old just for his age, so I will call 2006 Nadal babyThat Nadal had won 52 matches in a row on clay going into the 2006 Rome final.
I understand masters, but don't see why they had to apply that change to the YEC too. 2007 WTF was the last edition that featured a BO5 final (as well as Federer and Ferrer's only BO5 match).
The finals o all big tournaments should be bo3 and the finals of all small tournaments should be bo5IMO the finals of all big tournaments should be Bo5.
Federer wins: "LOL, baby Nadal."Peak Federer could not even beat 19yo Nadal![]()
![]()
Late night , I watched it completely. Really enjoyed it. Watched it twice
Murrays look back at one of the best clay matches you'll ever see...
Same with 2014-19 Federer, no?Federer wins: "LOL, baby Nadal."