My ex-wife forgot our daughter's name....

Robert-

Sorry to hear this. It's gut wrenching, particularly when you don't really know what is going on and even more so when you do and their is no clear way you can help.

Anyway, after reading all of the posts it seems that the diagnosis is fait acompli, but I would not jump to any conclusions. The first area I would try and rule out as a cause is her current meds. Sometimes this requires quite a bit of experimentation, but it's critical to determine whether or not they are a contributing factor.

For years, my mother was taking a cocktail of meds to treat various issues. At one point several years ago she was diagnosed with Parkinson's. We sought second and third opinions on this and the same diagnosis came back. However, the one thing that bothered me was that none of the doctors who diagnosed Parkinsons could explain to me the interaction between all of the drugs she was taking and whether or not they could cause her symptoms (uncontrollable shaking in her right hand).

Finally, we worked with a doctor who simplified her drug cocktail, experimented with substitutes, etc., and they were able to identify the drug that was causing the shaking. No Parkinsons was the conclusion.

Anyway, my general rule of thumb is doctors are often just as clueless as we are when it comes to diagnosing things. I realize it's extremely difficult to do, but it is critical to get it right even if it does take time.

I sure hope things work out for her.

That's very interesting. She's on a variety of drugs for high bp, depression, and neck pain.

Funny you should mention Parkinson's because one of my brothers is an alcoholic and has Parkinson's. But, he shakes so badly that he must sit on his hands. His memory is quite sharp still, but his speech is badly slurred. So, at first I thought the alcohol may have caused Parkinson's, but my ex has no shaking at all.

My guess is that since she's had memory problems for about 10 years or longer than she is slowly progressing towards some form of dementia. I would think Ollinger's suggested meds might be the way to go to give her maybe a few extra months of meaningful life. Her appointment with her GP is Tuesday and I'm going, so I'll ask a lot of questions.

-Robert
 
I helped out at a drug rehab centre and we had a few NoS abusers who complained of memory loss. (Not suggesting anything like that)

But we would tell them that vitamin B12 is very good for short term memory. Perhaps she should try that? It seems more of a 'tip of the tongue' sort of thing. Maybe it would help?
 
What is NoS?

That's why I'm trying to get her to take a multivitamin, to get enough of stuff like B12. She had been getting B12 shots for about a year. She's now off them.

-Robert
 
chess9 I'm sorry to hear this is happening to your ex-wife. I hope you get the answers from your doctors visit. But I imagine the doctor will send her off to a specialist. If you are concerned about a drug interaction, bring it up with your doctor or pharmacists as they are supposed to warn you about these interactions too.

I don't mean to sound negative but if it is Alzheimer's I don't think there is anything you can do about it. A lot of these vitamins/supplements that have been around for decades have not really shown much or any value (but be sure to ask your doctors about proven medications). You already mentioned your ex-wife does not like to swallow large pills. I don't think she would be comfortable taking a bunch of pills daily for the rest of her life.

The only thing I can say is once everyone in your family can accept her condition, spend time with each other, take pictures, and cherish every moment. We can't live forever, but we can make every moment we live meaningful.
 
...Her appointment with her GP is Tuesday and I'm going, so I'll ask a lot of questions.

...


Bring a list of all her meds with you and ask about interactions. Hopefully the GP will know whether or not they are potentially compounding the problem, and if not, hopefully tell you he/she doesn't really know.

Good luck.
 
chess9 I'm sorry to hear this is happening to your ex-wife. I hope you get the answers from your doctors visit. But I imagine the doctor will send her off to a specialist. If you are concerned about a drug interaction, bring it up with your doctor or pharmacists as they are supposed to warn you about these interactions too.

I don't mean to sound negative but if it is Alzheimer's I don't think there is anything you can do about it. A lot of these vitamins/supplements that have been around for decades have not really shown much or any value (but be sure to ask your doctors about proven medications). You already mentioned your ex-wife does not like to swallow large pills. I don't think she would be comfortable taking a bunch of pills daily for the rest of her life.

The only thing I can say is once everyone in your family can accept her condition, spend time with each other, take pictures, and cherish every moment. We can't live forever, but we can make every moment we live meaningful.

That's a very very nice post, Koopa. Thanks!-Robert
 
Bring a list of all her meds with you and ask about interactions. Hopefully the GP will know whether or not they are potentially compounding the problem, and if not, hopefully tell you he/she doesn't really know.

Good luck.

Yes, good idea. I actually don't know all her current meds, or what diabolical substances she could be ingesting in the way of supplements.

-Robert
 
I'd go with the nicotine (patches, gum, etc) but forget the smoking. It has been known for quite some time that nicotine is cholinergic and appears to enhance concentration, memory and learning. Nicotine is considered a nootropic = smart drug.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine#Psychoactive_effects

Note that Niacin can provide some of the same learning & attention benefits as nicotine. This may be due, in part, to the fact that they are chemically related -- Niacin can be derived from nicotine (using nitric acid). In fact, the name 'niacin' was derived from nicotinic acid + vitamin.

You'll probably need to consider higher than RDA levels of niacin to see much of an effect on mood, attention, and learning. Niacin can produce a niacin flush, whereas niacinamide will probably not. However, not sure if niacinamide will produce the same level of these benefits. The niacin flash can be slightly annoying but it completely harmless. Extremely high levels (2000 mg/day) of niacin can result in liver damage. It is best to keep niacin supplementation to 500 mg/day (or under 250 mg/day if you really want to be conservative).

Choline and other B vitamins can promote attention or alertness. To my knowledge, vitamin B6 is the only other B vitamin with known toxic levels. It is advised to keep the daily intake of B6 under 250 mg.

Note that DMAE (mentioned in post #32) is also chemically related to the vitamin B family.



What is NoS?

That's why I'm trying to get her to take a multivitamin, to get enough of stuff like B12. She had been getting B12 shots for about a year. She's now off them.

-Robert

NOS is an energy drink but I suspect that he is referring to something else. Nitrous Oxide, perhaps.

A multi vitamin will probably only provide RDA levels and will probably not supply phytonutrients and other co-factors needed to properly assimilate the vitamins & minerals. You might suggest an additional B complex supplement to get some additional niacin, B12, choline and other B vitamins. Also try to more of your B vitamins and other nutrients from food in order to get those phytonutrients and other co-factors.

.
 
Last edited:
SA!

Thanks for that. I copied and pasted it to an email to my daughter and ex. Certainly those approaches are worth trying. Probably couldn't be harmful.

-Robert
 
Strange to think that there's more evidence supporting the value of a few Advil and a cigarette for Alzheimers than for any supplement you can name. I noted earlier all the data supporting the benefit of nicotine. Concerning Advil, a study of 35,000 arthritis sufferers found that those who regularly use antiinflammatory drugs had a much lower incidence of Alzheimers. Again, it makes a certain amount of sense since the amyloid deposition found in the brains of Alzheimers victims is known to be an inflammatory reaction, so the antiinflammatory drugs may block a key step in the damage that occurs in the brain.
 
Good point. But, she did finally recover our daughter's name. Took awhile.... She really has noticeable deficits with directions and losing things. Like misplacing her cellphone and the check mentioned in another post in this thread. Her car keys have been a ******. A few years ago I put a huge chain with a picture of our daughter on her keys. She's kept track of her keys as a result. Names are a big problem for her. So, most of it sounds like short term memory loss, and a loss of her directional sense.

Well, I will hear this evening or tomorrow when her appointment is scheduled. I'm sure the doctors will figure this one out.

So, you don't think any supplements would be useful? You're in medicine, no?

-Robert


Bearing in mind that Neuro is not my area, my understanding is that though common single problems (like Alzheimers) will end up with long and short term losses, the classic symptoms at the point of diagnosis (early going) are going to be much more heavily weighted to one or the other.

Supplements are certainly available without a Rx and are worth a try and I would not try to dissuade you from pursuing them, but pinning hopes of a major improvement on them is probably being cruel.

Hopefully it is something completely reversible, like HPHC.

Good luck.
 
Strange to think that there's more evidence supporting the value of a few Advil and a cigarette for Alzheimers than for any supplement you can name. I noted earlier all the data supporting the benefit of nicotine. Concerning Advil, a study of 35,000 arthritis sufferers found that those who regularly use antiinflammatory drugs had a much lower incidence of Alzheimers. Again, it makes a certain amount of sense since the amyloid deposition found in the brains of Alzheimers victims is known to be an inflammatory reaction, so the antiinflammatory drugs may block a key step in the damage that occurs in the brain.

Two Advil a day and a nicotine patch would have the best chances, based on the science? :)

That's very interesting stuff....Cheap too!

-Robert
 
Strange to think that there's more evidence supporting the value of a few Advil and a cigarette for Alzheimers than for any supplement you can name. I noted earlier all the data supporting the benefit of nicotine. Concerning Advil, a study of 35,000 arthritis sufferers found that those who regularly use antiinflammatory drugs had a much lower incidence of Alzheimers. Again, it makes a certain amount of sense since the amyloid deposition found in the brains of Alzheimers victims is known to be an inflammatory reaction, so the antiinflammatory drugs may block a key step in the damage that occurs in the brain.

We still don't know if we are talking about Alzheimer's here.

Unfortunately, regular use of both ibuprofen (Advil) and cigarettes come with some significant unwanted side effects. This is true for much of the pharmaceuticals offered by Western medicine. One reason that there is a wealth of evidence for ibuprofen and for prescription drugs is that the large pharmaceutical companies that produce these drugs can afford to fund much of the research. Not so for supplements or substances that are not patentable drugs.

Curious, would you happen to know if anti-inflammatory herbs such as turmeric, rosemary, holy basil, ginger root, green tea, etc have been subjected to rigorous study to determine their efficacy for Alz, dementia or other memory related dysfunction? Many herbs have been shown to inhibit COX-2. I don't believe that they have a significant inhibition on COX-1 as ibuprofen does. For this reason, they may be much kinder/gentler to the stomach and the rest of the gastro-intestinal system that IB and other anti-inflammatory drugs.
 
Most of the studies I've perused of supplements impacting enzyme activity were done in vitro, so they don't really tell us if there's any significant activity in vivo. This is a vital issue as LOTS of things that happen in a test tube don't happen in a biological system. The herb and supplement studies frequently don't deal with dosing issues -- animal studies may have suggested possible benefit, but if you don't do very complex dosing studies in humans, you have no idea how much is enough. The study of 35,000 arthritis patients was not funded by pharm. companies, and ibuprofen (Advil) had long since been available generically (so the company had no reason to fund such a study).
 
Concerning ibuprofen side effects, the truth is that most people don't have bothersome side effects. Those who do can stop taking it.
 
Got this from a friend today. My ex is not anywhere near this bad!

"I just got a message from Maggie, her Brother in Law was diagnosed as having Alzheimer's and Dementia today. Mags Sister has been in denial over it, even though Mags has told her that he ohones her 10 times every morning to tell Mags what the temperature is.

Here is the summary of the appointment. BIL couldn't draw a clock, or spell a 3 letter word that was printed out in front of him backwards, or remember 3 words the Doc asked him to remember. My sister is totally off the planet because now it is real. On the flip side, he has phoned twice with temperature updates. I asked him how his appointment was and he said, "I am fit as a fiddle." Augh!!!!!! It is going to be a long winter I fear."

I can't imagine the horror for a relative. Frankly, I've never had a relative or friend in this condition. This isn't living....

-Robert
 
There's quite a few nutrients out there. Of course seeing a doctor is the #1 recommendation. Once a problem becomes obvious generally it has progressed quite a bit. Time is very important as when some problems progress too far they are much harder if not possible to correct or slow down their progression.

Here's a good site I visit now and then. A lot of info about everything.

You could check out cognitex, it's a good multi nutrient approach to brain health.


http://www.lef.org/
 
There's quite a few nutrients out there. Of course seeing a doctor is the #1 recommendation. Once a problem becomes obvious generally it has progressed quite a bit. Time is very important as when some problems progress too far they are much harder if not possible to correct or slow down their progression.

Here's a good site I visit now and then. A lot of info about everything.

You could check out cognitex, it's a good multi nutrient approach to brain health.


http://www.lef.org/

The Cognitex formulation looks rather interesting. I have used quite a few of the ingredients listed to combat my own memory & focus issues. (In the next day or two I'll try to get around to providing more details about countermeasures I've utilized for my cognitive problems).

One of the things that jumped out at me was their inclusion of hops, ginger (root), and rosemary. I have been supplementing with these spices along with turmeric (and a few others) for more than 8 yrs now to keep inflammation in check -- in order to minimize my dependence on NSAIDs. It is interesting to see that they've included these for "neuro protection".
 
For myself, I've noticed I'm a bit slower to come up with answers to questions and to recall names I haven't used in a long time. I'd say that's normal for my age. For instance, if you asked me the term for the process of releasing Roman slaves (manumission) I'd take a few minutes to remember it, which is what happened when reading a Telegraph quiz on classical mythology. Ask me my 12th grade English teacher and I'd remember it almost immediately. But, in chess positions, I find myself missing the hidden trap occasionally. It's as though your IQ goes down about 20 points by the time you are 60. :( I so hate getting below zero....

-Robert
 
For myself, I've noticed I'm a bit slower to come up with answers to questions and to recall names I haven't used in a long time. I'd say that's normal for my age. For instance, if you asked me the term for the process of releasing Roman slaves (manumission) I'd take a few minutes to remember it, which is what happened when reading a Telegraph quiz on classical mythology. Ask me my 12th grade English teacher and I'd remember it almost immediately. But, in chess positions, I find myself missing the hidden trap occasionally. It's as though your IQ goes down about 20 points by the time you are 60. :( I so hate getting below zero....

-Robert


After 60 years of accumulating information it gets pretty crowded in there. Sure any kid with a few facts at his command can retrieve them instantly, you have to rummage around in the overfull attic for the single fact you need. The only saving grace is if you had a system over the decades to organize the facts as you acquired them. Too late for that now if you didn't.
 
Using supplements without really good data on their benefits curiously can lead to what I'll call The Papaverine Effect, i.e. not just lack of effect but harm. Papaverine was touted some years ago for dementia because it was thought to be a vasodilator that could help improve circulation to problem areas. (Dementia at the time was erroneously believed to mostly be due to arterial problems). But here's the problem -- Papaverine could dilate normal arteries but not those affected by arteriosclerosis. So the arteries to normal areas would dilate, increasing circulation to those areas and REDUCING circulation to the arteries that couldn't dilate in the problem areas -- known in medicine as a "steal syndrome." So there can be unanticipated problems if you're taking something without some real, and not just theoretical, basis.
 
Using supplements without really good data on their benefits curiously can lead to what I'll call The Papaverine Effect, i.e. not just lack of effect but harm. Papaverine was touted some years ago for dementia because it was thought to be a vasodilator that could help improve circulation to problem areas. (Dementia at the time was erroneously believed to mostly be due to arterial problems). But here's the problem -- Papaverine could dilate normal arteries but not those affected by arteriosclerosis. So the arteries to normal areas would dilate, increasing circulation to those areas and REDUCING circulation to the arteries that couldn't dilate in the problem areas -- known in medicine as a "steal syndrome." So there can be unanticipated problems if you're taking something without some real, and not just theoretical, basis.

Yes, and I absolutely agree with this. I have no doubt the unintended consquence of many meds and supplements have taken a few lives.

Take, for instance, ephedrine, which I tried on two occasions, and once collapsed from using. It certainly will keep you running for three hours, but it also raises your BP and heart rate. When the paramedics got to me, my bp was 190/105 and my heart rate was at 173. I was running on the treadmill at the Y preparing for an Ironman race and doing an 'easy' 20 mile run, until about mile 15, when I started feeling dizzy and stumbled off the treadmill, sending the place into pandemonium. After this incident the director of the Y told me I could never run more than 30 minutes there again and that if I was caught 'doing drugs' I'd be kicked out. :) She was extremely pissed. :(

I took ephedrine, btw, because a runner friend told me he used it all the time for his distance training. But, the amount of ephedrine in each capsule wasn't standardized, so you could get 25mgs or 100mgs, notwithstanding what the bottle said. Yet another argument for standardized meds.

Thanks for your response!

-Robert
 
After 60 years of accumulating information it gets pretty crowded in there. Sure any kid with a few facts at his command can retrieve them instantly, you have to rummage around in the overfull attic for the single fact you need. The only saving grace is if you had a system over the decades to organize the facts as you acquired them. Too late for that now if you didn't.

LOL. I think my hard drive needs re-formatting as it suffers from OS rot. ;)

I am so organized that I keep socks in about 8 different places. I am probably the most disorganized person on these boards. I actually run out of clean clothes before I do the wash. :)

-Robert
 
November 17 is the Alzheimer's Foundation national memory screening day. Check at your local pharmacy, Y, Jewish Community Center, or Senior Center. Get checked and report back. I need to know if anyone here has a mind. ;)

-Robert
 
^^^ It is interesting to note that Ephedra (Ma Huang), from which ephedrine and pseudoephedrine are derived, have been used in Chinese medicine for more than 5000 yrs. In Chinese medicine it's been used to keep the body (health) in balance or nudge it back into balance. However, when used in the West in dietary supplements and other uses, is when the abuse and problems arose.

It is not the ephedra that is at fault, it is the dosages and the careless use of ephdera products that have given rise to problems seen with this herb.

Using supplements without really good data on their benefits curiously can lead to what I'll call The Papaverine Effect, i.e. not just lack of effect but harm. Papaverine was touted some years ago for dementia because it was thought to be a vasodilator that could help improve circulation to problem areas. (Dementia at the time was erroneously believed to mostly be due to arterial problems). But here's the problem -- Papaverine could dilate normal arteries but not those affected by arteriosclerosis. So the arteries to normal areas would dilate, increasing circulation to those areas and REDUCING circulation to the arteries that couldn't dilate in the problem areas -- known in medicine as a "steal syndrome." So there can be unanticipated problems if you're taking something without some real, and not just theoretical, basis.

I agree wholehearted that one should not indulge in supplementation willy-nilly. I've always researched & educated myself on any herb, supplement or drug that I consider taking. I urge all who consider supplements -- do your homework. Don't just buy into the wild claims made by some manufacturers. Seek out the caveats as well. Try to get a balanced and informed view of any such substance.

With that said, I would much rather take supplements, which may have a slight risk, than watch my brain or body deteriorate waiting years or even decades for Western medicine to come up with a suitable "cure".

It should be pointed out that Papaverine is not a supplement, to my knowledge, but is a prescription drug. For the most part supplements tend to have fewer and milder unwanted side effects than the prescriptions drugs offered by Western medicine. Side effects are usually seen with supplements when UTLs (Upper Tolerance Limits) are exceed. Note that UTLs are usually higher much than RDAs. The other time when side effects are seen is when supplements are used in conjunction with prescription drugs. However, this is not really the fault of the supplements in these situations -- it is the prescription drugs that throw the body out of kilter.

My preference is to get nutrients or "medicines" closer to the plant source. Most herbs and most other natural substances have been used for centuries (or millennia). In Indian/Ayurvedic, Chinese and other "folk medicines" it is well known which plants are poisonous and which are medicinal. It is also fairly well known in those medicinal traditions what amounts are appropriate. The focus of many of these traditional medicines are to achieve balance in the body.

Contrast this with Western medicine where powerful drugs & procedures are employed when the body is way out of kilter. These drugs tend to throw the body our of balance in a different direction(s). These drugs often start off with a natural/plant substance that shows some promise. However, the pharmaceutical companies cannot really make any substantial amount of money providing the public with "natural" cures since they cannot patent these. Instead they tweak a "natural" substance significantly so that they come up with something that they can patent-- this way they can make gobs of money from it.

With these patentable drugs, the pharmaceutical companies will often/usually come up with something that is more potent than the original "natural" substance. However, this often comes at a huge price (and a huge price tag). The trade-off for its potency is that the patentable drug will almost always have more unwanted side effects and side effects that are significantly more severe than the original substance from which it was derived.
 
Quit answering the phone, doorknob. You need her like you need another hole in your head. Move on...it's the best thing you can do for both of you.
 
Most of the studies I've perused of supplements impacting enzyme activity were done in vitro, so they don't really tell us if there's any significant activity in vivo. This is a vital issue as LOTS of things that happen in a test tube don't happen in a biological system. The herb and supplement studies frequently don't deal with dosing issues -- animal studies may have suggested possible benefit, but if you don't do very complex dosing studies in humans, you have no idea how much is enough. The study of 35,000 arthritis patients was not funded by pharm. companies, and ibuprofen (Advil) had long since been available generically (so the company had no reason to fund such a study).

Concerning ibuprofen side effects, the truth is that most people don't have bothersome side effects. Those who do can stop taking it.

Appreciate the feedback ollinger.

Ibuprofen in low dosages does appears to have less impact on the gastrointestinal system than other NSAIDs. However, regular higher dosing or long-term use of IB still is cause for concern. It is associated with an increased risk of peptic ulcers, stomach bleeding and possible kidney damage. It can also present a cardiovascular risk (altho' possibly a bit lesser risk than a COX-2 inhibitor such as Celebrex).

webmd.com/alzheimers/news/20080505/ibuprofen-may-cut-alzheimers-risk

From what I've read it takes at least 2 years of regular use of IB to see any real reduction in the incidence of Alzheimer's. Greater reductions are seen with longer-term use -- 5 yrs or more shows significant reductions. However, most articles that I've read do not indicate a daily dosage. The duration of use seems to be mentioned in most articles, but not the dosage. Any ideas on the latter?
 
I went with my wife and daughter to see the GP yesterday at noon.

He had his nurse give her a short test with verbal and written questions and some cards. Afterward, the doctor told us she might have some mild cognitive impairment, particularly with numbers. But, he referred her to a group that specializes in treating such issues. She will be fully tested there in three weeks. She has an MRI scheduled for next week. He was very upbeat, though he doesn't think ANY supplements are going to be helpful, except to the supplement companies. :) My ex was having a good day and said "Well, I've always had trouble with numbers." LOL! True, but if you can't add 5 or 6 numbers slowly spoken to you?

On November 17, Alzheimer's Testing Day, I'm going to get tested, and I suggest than anyone over 60 do the same, if for no other reason than to satisfy themselves that they are ok. If you can't remember the score of your tennis match...then maybe you need help? ;)

-Robert
 
Why get tested when they can't do anything about it? Its not like its treatable.. Seriously.

There is an eye drop test you can do that looks for a marker (I think its the APoE gene). Years ago I asked my eye doctor to test for it. He said he knew about the test and refused to do it.. Becaue he didn't think it would do any good to know your likely to get alzheimers.
 
The best argument against some kinds of testing is a study done in the 70s by a well known neurology research group in Chicago. Huntington's Disease is a rapidly degenerative inheritable form of dementia that leads to debility and convulsions in less than a year. It is autosomal dominant (50% risk of inheritance) and is known as Woody Guthrie Disease, as Woody died from it. The study gave L-DOPA, the Parkinson's drug, to the children of Huntington's patient's to test the hypothesis that small transient movement disturbances that develop after taking the DOPA would predict which of them would develop H.D. decades later. Someone close to the situation told me that a few of them who were positive for this "stress test" subsequently committed suicide.
 
Guyclinch, I think there's a difference between knowing you have a potential for a disease and knowing you have the disease itself.
 
Well, Ollie has suggested drugs that slow the progression of Alzheimer's, plus there's a ton of research going on now. I wouldn't exactly throw in the towel just yet. I'm no Gulbis. ;)

-Robert
 
Well, Ollie has suggested drugs that slow the progression of Alzheimer's, plus there's a ton of research going on now. I wouldn't exactly throw in the towel just yet. I'm no Gulbis. ;)

-Robert

Just telling you those anti depressants can be very dangerous....
 
You said her cholesterol was bad. Is she taking statins? Some statins induce alzheimer's symptoms in some people.

Is she getting treatment for depression? Depression causes memory symptoms too. Many people who have supposed dementia get better after getting treated for depression.
 
Here is a video that Dr. Newport put together on coconut oil helping with dementia that her husband is experiencing. The video is long but might be of interest.

http://web.me.com/grownmanfred/NaturesApproved/home.html

Agree with statins being a possible memory problem. For most statins are safe, but every once in awhile statins can have wacky side effects. Dr Davis, a cardologist, wrote about some of the unusual side effects he has witnessed in his patients.

http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/wacky-statin-effects.html

&

http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com/2007/04/lipitor-and-memory.html

and last but not least, Dr Larry McCleary, a neurosurgeon has a blog in which is discusses what works and what doesn't when it comes to brain health.

http://www.drmccleary.com/default.aspx

When it comes to natural products, in many of Dr McCleary's past blog posts you will find he discusses the benefits of vitamin D3 for brain health - also known as the sunshine vitamin. It is the vitamin that our body manufactures when warm sunlight strikes our skin. the older we become, the less efficient our skin becomes at manufacturing D3. With your ex being over the age of 50, she probably doesn't manufacture much D3 any longer. It is something to talk to your doctor about.

Personally, I would avoid the prescription form of vitamin D. The prescription form is called D2, which is the plant form of D. It is poorly utilized by the body. As far as I can tell the only reason why D2 is around is because it could be patented.

The best vitamin D to take is D3, found in most grocery and drug stores. The oil softgel type is best absorbed by the body. (The dry powder tablets of D3 are all to often not absorbed and should be avoided)

D3 testing is also advisable. You want testing levels to be between 60 to 70ng/ml year round. Your doctor can perform the D3 test.

To read more about vitamin D and its ability to help the mind, along with help prevent bone loss, heart disease, and some cancers, Dr Cannell, a leading researching on vitamin D, has an excellet web sight and news letter at:

http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/

Hope that helps! Good luck!!
 
I prefer data to blog theories. As for statins, the Austrian study of over 17,000 patients suggests statins may dramatically reduce dementia risk and a number of studies of this question are ongoing now.
 
Chess,

Dude, I hope nothing but the best for you and your family.....I am no Doctor, nor do I have any advice, just well wishes for you..

Ollie,

Your one smart cookie. I enjoyed reading what you had to say.....
 
Back
Top