My ohbh power potential is like 10x my forehand power potential

I'm similar to the OP and I believe it's because I'm not fully LHed, which is what I play tennis with.

I write, play snooker, badminton and tennis LH; but I throw, play golf and cricket RH. Hence my LH is precise but weak, and my RH is powerful but not accurate. So I don't get much natural body power into my LH FH, but I easily get rotation power into my LH OHBH because it's like hitting a golf shot, or a drive in cricket. Bizarrely, I can throw RH perfectly coordinated and powerfully, but I cannot coordinate the serve at all RH. And I can serve nicely LHed, but I can't throw at all LHed. Something didn't join up properly in my brain.
 
Ok that's pretty funny but please don't be sarcastic. Someone might not get it and take you seriously.
I was serious. Arming means less moving parts, a more steady head which will only help a rec player. Add to this the overratedness of power up to 4.5 level above which a rec player is very unlikely to reach.
 
I'm a 3.5 level player looking to push into 4.0. Like many others, my forehand is more consistent than my backhand, especially because of the ohbh. HOWEVER, for some reason or another, my backhand is just so much more powerful. When I try to rip a forehand winner it goes about as fast as a 70% power backhand, while when i try to hit a backhand winner it's like almost as fast as my serve (75-80mph?).
I might post a video of me trying to rip a forehand vs a backhand sometime soon when i get onto the courts.
In the meantime, any tips or anything I can try? thx
Your problem is your forehand is really bad. Even in pro players who hit backhand better than forehand, it always means their forehand is crap.

You need to fix your forehand.
 
against the guy in my match i only sliced or hit high topspin backhands because the guy was hitting nadal-style forehands to my backhand so not really any footage for a backhand i ripped that wasnt a bad passing shot
 
oh god im gonna get like hated on for this but i use an *almost* full western for my forehand grip
 
Yeah but I’ve seen other people hit super hard with a full western and I use a less extreme western (like in the middle of semi and full)
 
Yeah but I’ve seen other people hit super hard with a full western and I use a less extreme western (like in the middle of semi and full)
You need to either use quite powerful racquet (high SW) like Djokovic or Khachanov and smoothly smack the ball.
Or slap the ball all-in like Kyrgios.

When you brush the ball with 300g racquet using W grip, you are not likely to get much power.
 
I'm guessing this 3.5 power backhand often get the attention of players on the courts playing immediately behind yous?
 
i don't have a 1hhb... but if someone asks me to fence the ball, say 4 courts down... i always go further winding up with my 1hbh (conti grip), than i do with my fh.
similarly i can throw a frisbee/aerobie further with a "bh" throw, than with a "fh" throw
guessing there is a correlation there
 
i don't have a 1hhb... but if someone asks me to fence the ball, say 4 courts down... i always go further winding up with my 1hbh (conti grip), than i do with my fh.
similarly i can throw a frisbee/aerobie further with a "bh" throw, than with a "fh" throw
guessing there is a correlation there
There might be a correlation. I can assure you there is no causation.
 
i don't have a 1hhb... but if someone asks me to fence the ball, say 4 courts down... i always go further winding up with my 1hbh (conti grip), than i do with my fh.
similarly i can throw a frisbee/aerobie further with a "bh" throw, than with a "fh" throw
guessing there is a correlation there
When players rage-launch balls over the stands, do they use BH technique?
 
That is 69 posts....

...............what is the OP's forehand or backhand technique?

Does he bend his elbow on the forehand or backhand when turning or swinging forward? That usually is associated with the grip.

Why discuss techniques with no information?
 
Hard to believe. Can you backhand throw a ball much faster than forehand throw?
@Dragy

Overhand throwing mechanics are quite a bit different from forehand stroke mechanics. Different muscle recruitment.

Note that a majority of ppl are much at throwing a Frisbee with a backhand motion than a forehand motion.
 
Don't the pros flick?
A quick supination, external shoulder rotation rather as I understand it. So it’s not the wrist joint, it’s the forearm/arm. Flicking of the wrist sort of implies actual wrist motions like flexion, extension, radial/ulnar deviation.
 
Last edited:
A quick supination, external shoulder rotation rather as I understand it. So it’s not the wrist joint, it’s the forearm/arm. Flicking of the wrist sort of implies actual wrist motions like flexion, extension, radial/ulnar deviation.
Well you can check out slo mo video.
 
@Dragy

Overhand throwing mechanics are quite a bit different from forehand stroke mechanics. Different muscle recruitment.

Note that a majority of ppl are much at throwing a Frisbee with a backhand motion than a forehand motion.
Yet Olympic discus throwers don’t use “frisbee” techniques, do they?

The issue with FH throw for frisbee is not lack of power but unnatural alignment. Frisbee should be staying horizontally stable to float further.

@ballmachineguy sure it’s not FH drive technique. But in the grand scheme of things it’s much more similar: throwing, serving, slapping the ball; than it is with the BH alternative.

There are players who apply a very throw-like technique to their FHs, and those who are farther away.
 
Yet Olympic discus throwers don’t use “frisbee” techniques, do they?

The issue with FH throw for frisbee is not lack of power but unnatural alignment. Frisbee should be staying horizontally stable to float further.

@ballmachineguy sure it’s not FH drive technique. But in the grand scheme of things it’s much more similar: throwing, serving, slapping the ball; than it is with the BH alternative.

There are players who apply a very throw-like technique to their FHs, and those who are farther away.
Totally correct.

Frisbee (usually backhand-like thrown) flight relies on the gyroscopic effect to maintain tilt and cut the air. To achieve this, there is a lot of wrist and elbow involvement which does not exist in 1hbh, plus no need for low-to-high action similar to the needs for topspin, as it is highly advisable to keep it in a plane.
The olympic disc (usually forehand-like thrown) is at least 3x as heavy as a racquet, and the distance it reaches depends on the momentum that the athlete is able to provide to it but also on the gyroscopic stability. Such momentum is obtained through whole body rotation with the final release done on the pivot of the contrary side leg, in order to achieve the largest linear velocity.

Both could be thrown the other way around. Actually, the frisbee is done so (forehand motion), and it's acknowledged to be tougher to get the gyroscopic stability, which has a larger impact than pure acceleration. As it regards the oplympic disc, my guess is that it is not thrown backhand also due to alignment issues with the hand and worse stability associated to "backwards" rotation.

In any case, disc throwing has always been a futile comparison for tennis strokes.
 
Getting 75Mph on your backhand is one thing, keeping it in consistently is quite another. Let's hope his GoPro is working.

Actually, getting 75 mph backhand without injury even if it hits the fence is an incredible achievement. It's far superior than 30mph bh which falls short of the service line. We could easily work on adding spin to get the ball closer to BL once we crack 75 mph without injuring ourselves.
 
That is 69 posts....

...............what is the OP's forehand or backhand technique?

Does he bend his elbow on the forehand or backhand when turning or swinging forward? That usually is associated with the grip.

Why discuss techniques with no information?

Your frustration on the lack of complete information is understandable. We are talking about recreational 3.5 bh here, not much of shoulder separation, kinetic chain, leg, hip, core etc.
The most relevant question is whether OP can hit his shots without injuring himself over the course of couple of months.
 
Your frustration on the lack of complete information is understandable. We are talking about recreational 3.5 bh here, not much of shoulder separation, kinetic chain, leg, hip, core etc.
The most relevant question is whether OP can hit his shots without injuring himself over the course of couple of months.
After all these years, threads and posts -

Please describe or show a video of recreational 3.5 bh techniques.

My approach is to do exactly that for ATP and WTA players for their techniques. Many others are doing exactly the same. There is a huge and coherent body of knowledge on pro tennis stroke biomechanics.

What techniques are being used for 3.5 1HBHs that allow less injuries? Tennis Elbow (TE) seems prevalent in lower level tennis but not so for ATP players. ? D. Knudson has commented on the prevalence TE among amateurs but not pros. Not saying that all pro techniques are safe, but saying that many 3.5 techniques are not known and often questionable regarding safety.

3.5 techniques are completely unknown and completely undescribed based on the information that is being presented. Forum comments by posters alone don't seem creditable unless these views are also seen in other creditable sources. Got anything?

Example of ATP techniques
Forum Search: Internal Shoulder Rotation Tennis Serve
Member: Chas Tennis

3.5 Rec Serving Techniques?
Please present a single video or word description.

Waiter's Tray serving technique is prevalent among 3.5 players. How easy is it to find and present a word description or video describing the Waiter's Tray? What's being taught about WT? Recognize when you are in a Tennis Technique Nuthouse.

There are some long threads but 3.5 stroke information does not survive and become presented as far as I have seen. Got anything?
 
Last edited:
After all these years, threads and posts -

Please describe or show a video of recreational 3.5 bh techniques.

My approach is to do exactly that for ATP and WTA players for their techniques. Many others are doing exactly the same. There is a huge and coherent body of knowledge on pro tennis stroke biomechanics.

What techniques are being used for 3.5 1HBHs that allow less injuries? Tennis Elbow (TE) seems prevalent in lower level tennis but not so for ATP players. ? D. Knudson has commented on the prevalence TE among amateurs but not pros. Not saying that all pro techniques are safe, but saying that many 3.5 techniques are not known and often questionable regarding safety.

3.5 techniques are completely unknown and completely undescribed based on the information that is being presented. Forum comments by posters alone don't seem creditable unless these views are also seen in other creditable sources. Got anything?

Example of ATP techniques
Forum Search: Internal Shoulder Rotation Tennis Serve
Member: Chas Tennis

3.5 Rec Serving Techniques?
Please present a single video or word description.

Waiter's Tray serving technique is prevalent among 3.5 players. How easy is it to find and present a word description or video describing the Waiter's Tray? What's being taught about WT? Recognize when you are in a Tennis Technique Nuthouse.

There are some long threads but 3.5 stroke information does not survive and become presented as far as I have seen. Got anything?

I guess it all comes down to two crossed categories efficient/non-efficient technique and safe/unsafe technique. Rec. technique and ATP/WTA technique is pure nonsense.

One thing is clear. To reach ATP/WTA/ITF level, one needs a technique that is safe to the body and efficient. Recreational players can use unsafe techniques only if they don't play much, and with regards of efficiency, I guess depends on the player level.

My 0.02 is that pro players do not hit how they hit because they are excellent athletes, but because it's the most efficient and the safest way for them to achieve their goals in high-level tennis. I'd like to know if someone believes that they do technical stuff that is unsafe for the recreational player, why it would be so.
 
After all these years, threads and posts -

Please describe or show a video of recreational 3.5 bh techniques.

My approach is to do exactly that for ATP and WTA players for their techniques. Many others are doing exactly the same. There is a huge and coherent body of knowledge on pro tennis stroke biomechanics.

What techniques are being used for 3.5 1HBHs that allow less injuries? Tennis Elbow (TE) seems prevalent in lower level tennis but not so for ATP players. ? D. Knudson has commented on the prevalence TE among amateurs but not pros. Not saying that all pro techniques are safe, but saying that many 3.5 techniques are not known and often questionable regarding safety.

3.5 techniques are completely unknown and completely undescribed based on the information that is being presented. Forum comments by posters alone don't seem creditable unless these views are also seen in other creditable sources. Got anything?

Example of ATP techniques
Forum Search: Internal Shoulder Rotation Tennis Serve
Member: Chas Tennis

3.5 Rec Serving Techniques?
Please present a single video or word description.

Waiter's Tray serving technique is prevalent among 3.5 players. How easy is it to find and present a word description or video describing the Waiter's Tray? What's being taught about WT? Recognize when you are in a Tennis Technique Nuthouse.

There are some long threads but 3.5 stroke information does not survive and become presented as far as I have seen. Got anything?

The variations are just too many to come up with a representational 3.5 technique.

You seem to complain about how there are so many videos on ATP technique but not any on 3.5 technique on a regular basis.
There's no market for "learn how to hit with 3.5 technique". Similarly, you will find many books on "How to ace your <XZY> exam/test". Do you ever find a book on "How to get a D or F in <something>"?
Why is it so hard to understand? Isn't it very obvious? Nobody needs analysis or coaching to hit with 3.5 technique. It's like breathing - the birth is the ticket for 3.5 technique.
 
Last edited:
I'll post some 3.5 backhand technique videos here eventually and you can all trash me and/or help me improve. However none of my strokes have 10X power potential of any other particular stroke of mine even if I use my off hand.
 
I'll post some 3.5 backhand technique videos here eventually and you can all trash me and/or help me improve. However none of my strokes have 10X power potential of any other particular stroke of mine even if I use my off hand.

10x is a piece of cake. Miss every forehand to go behind you, now every backhand you hit is infinitely more powerful.
 
The variations are just too many to come up with a representational 3.5 technique.

You seem to complain about how there are so many videos on ATP technique but not any on 3.5 technique on a regular basis.
There's no market for "learn how to hit with 3.5 technique". Similarly, you will find many books on "How to ace your <XZY> exam/test". Do you ever find a book on "How to get a D or F in <something>"?
Why is it so hard to understand? Isn't it very obvious? Nobody needs analysis or coaching to hit with 3.5 technique. It's like breathing - the birth is the ticket for 3.5 technique.
I was just pointing out that no one can describe in words or videos what the 3.5 level stroke techniques are. How are these techniques communicated? No videos? No written words? It's like an ancient civilization that never discovered writing.

A poster posted 3.5 ish serving video that displayed serve techniques made up of combinations of a few sub-motions. I have posted that video somewhere. You saw Waiter's Tray and some other techniques with sub-motions. Maybe there were some pro sub-motions. DIY sub-motions..........sub-motions with minimized ranges of motion vs pro sub-motions.
 
Actually, getting 75 mph backhand without injury even if it hits the fence is an incredible achievement. It's far superior than 30mph bh which falls short of the service line. We could easily work on adding spin to get the ball closer to BL once we crack 75 mph without injuring ourselves.
one day I thought about what would take my bh to the next level...went out and hit it and yes it was vicious. But sadly my elderly shoulder would explode at the forces I was exerting. I would need to really strengthen it to hit the way I wanted. That said I think I can/ do hit 75mph...
 
I was just pointing out that no one can describe in words or videos what the 3.5 level stroke techniques are. How are these techniques communicated? No videos? No written words? It's like an ancient civilization that never discovered writing.

It's not that nobody can describe what 3.5 level techniques are - the cost of doing it is not worth the effort. An underdeveloped technique is caused by absence of several elements, by varying degree, that make up an advanced level stroke.
Overall the combination is huge : 1 missing one ore more requirements of an advanced stroke 2 the absence is on a spectrum, it's not binary.
It's a common sense choice to describe an advanced level technique than provide details of innumerable variations of underdeveloped technique.
 
If you wanna learn 3.5 technique, just ask a 3.5 how to hit an ATP forehand
The 3.5 might be actually good technique-wise but still lacking of consistency due to bad timing and match results due to that or making very poor tactical decisions.
 
Tbh when I’m on I’m on I’ve taken down 4.0s easily before (6utrs) but when I’m off I lose to 12 year olds (I’m 15)
 
Back
Top