I did not hear it with luxilon 4D soft
Good to know, I’ll demo again and hope it sounds good.
I did not hear it with luxilon 4D soft
Strung around 23 kgsGood to know, I’ll demo again and hope it sounds good.
Great insight. I found the Yonex HD 18x20 too soft, but it does have good weight and a decent balance point. Good luck!I've been hitting with the PAVS 2020 for the last 4-5 months. It does pretty much everything well for me, a perfect blend of feel, stability and maneuverability. I hit some very spinny serves/groundies with it, it's very easy to get into position and react with quickly when necessary, especially at net. Found that I like Luxilon ALU Power at 53lbs, did not like RPM Blast at all. Currently strung one with Luxilon 4G at 50lbs to see how it feels.
Serves are how I judge a racquet, and this is the area that I'm not quite as tuned in with: I can't get my flat serve consistent, it sails long a good majority of the time. On the other hand, my slice and kick serves are lethal weapons. I've found over time that I have to move my toss to be more over head vs. in front, or else I'm hitting net quite a bit. Smooth sailing since I figured that out, but it's a change from the other sticks I've used.
Comfort-wise, I find it to be well damped, and haven't had any painful results. My previous racquet, the PAVS Tour, was pinging my elbow on off-centered hits, so this new model definitely improves on that.
If I had to provide any detractions to this stick for me, it would be that it's whippy nature introduces a little variability into my shots. I think perhaps that's just me and my physiology though, a heavier racquet may be better suited for my game, so this isn't a knock on the PAVS at all. Lately I've been demo'ing the Yonex VCore 97 HD, a flexier ~12oz strung 18x20, and have been loving it for this exact reason, and a switch may be on the horizon because it "cleans up" my strokes due to having to be more deliberate with my prep and execution. The thing is, the heavier weight may get taxing the longer I hit, but I've been good w/ the PAVS for 2-3 hour matches, so there is that to consider. Small negatives out-weighed by a racquet that does just about everything well.
Much better but equivalent to the MP Extreme (in terms of quality)Better or worse then Head Extreme Tour?
Thank you! I have my own 97 HD now, and will be hitting with it for the next few sets to see if it's the real deal, or if the demo I had just so happened to arrive when it was an "on" day for me. Since I've hit well with both the HD and PAVS, in the end it's going to come down to which one I feel most confidant with more often. Neither are bad racquets, it's simply that one will be "more better" than the other, and naturally we all are always trying to attain that last nth % of performance Biggest question for my comparison now will be how well I can handle the additional weight over a longer 2-3 hour match play, which I should discover this weekend. Also, I'm currently testing/playing in colder temps, I need to see how I hold up with it during sweltering summer hitting.
Another thing to consider over time will be how opponents react to or handle my shots from each. I win a good amount of points on serve w/ PAVS because of the the spin and placement I can produce w/ it; same story w/ groundstrokes, last hitting session opponent said shots from PAVS were more top-spinny, while the Yonex hit a heavier, flatter ball. On the points I won with each, with the Yonex I was hitting more winners due to surgically-placed shots, while the PAVS was causing the opponent to send back easier put-away balls due to the variety of spin I was putting on my shots. Both viable methods, it'll take some time to see which method one I can sustain better against different kinds of opponents.
The PAVS 2020 is fantastic, a superbly well balanced racquet that doesn't have any glaring shortcomings that I haven't been able to adjust to for my style of play. I don't have to pull up on groundstrokes because I'm afraid of overhitting, or it hasn't been rattled at net while absorbing and redirecting a volley from a big hitter. When I'm on with my serve, it's a surgical instrument that often times wins me easy points/games. Having hit with it a good amount under stress, I can confidently say that it hasn't let me down in the slightest. Whatever the outcome of my Yonex 97 HD auditions, I'll be keeping the PAVS 2020 because its lighter weight and proven track record may prove to be beneficial in the long run.
On another topic: two months back, for fun I demo'd the EZone Tour 98, VCore 98 305, and the Clash 98. Here's how I felt they compared to the PAVS:
EZone Tour 98 - much heavier, yet more plush. Slower to wield. I served better with this racquet than the PAVS, but my groundstrokes were all over the place. I actually loved how this EZT felt, so much so that I brought one home for myself to see if I could work it into my hitting style, but for whatever reason the new one hits even worse, and doesn't at all feel like the demo unit, so that experiment is over.
VCore 98 - very, very similar to the PAVS. I could actually switch to this stick and not skip a beat. Didn't pursue any further than demo because the I'm already invested in PAVS, which hits just a tiny bit better for me. Yonex is a little more comfortable on the arm. Great stick though!
Clash 98 - a whole different bird, didn't do anything for me.
Really great feedback! You mentioned some great sticks! Keep swinging away.Thank you! I have my own 97 HD now, and will be hitting with it for the next few sets to see if it's the real deal, or if the demo I had just so happened to arrive when it was an "on" day for me. Since I've hit well with both the HD and PAVS, in the end it's going to come down to which one I feel most confidant with more often. Neither are bad racquets, it's simply that one will be "more better" than the other, and naturally we all are always trying to attain that last nth % of performance Biggest question for my comparison now will be how well I can handle the additional weight over a longer 2-3 hour match play, which I should discover this weekend. Also, I'm currently testing/playing in colder temps, I need to see how I hold up with it during sweltering summer hitting.
Another thing to consider over time will be how opponents react to or handle my shots from each. I win a good amount of points on serve w/ PAVS because of the the spin and placement I can produce w/ it; same story w/ groundstrokes, last hitting session opponent said shots from PAVS were more top-spinny, while the Yonex hit a heavier, flatter ball. On the points I won with each, with the Yonex I was hitting more winners due to surgically-placed shots, while the PAVS was causing the opponent to send back easier put-away balls due to the variety of spin I was putting on my shots. Both viable methods, it'll take some time to see which method one I can sustain better against different kinds of opponents.
The PAVS 2020 is fantastic, a superbly well balanced racquet that doesn't have any glaring shortcomings that I haven't been able to adjust to for my style of play. I don't have to pull up on groundstrokes because I'm afraid of overhitting, or it hasn't been rattled at net while absorbing and redirecting a volley from a big hitter. When I'm on with my serve, it's a surgical instrument that often times wins me easy points/games. Having hit with it a good amount under stress, I can confidently say that it hasn't let me down in the slightest. Whatever the outcome of my Yonex 97 HD auditions, I'll be keeping the PAVS 2020 because its lighter weight and proven track record may prove to be beneficial in the long run.
On another topic: two months back, for fun I demo'd the EZone Tour 98, VCore 98 305, and the Clash 98. Here's how I felt they compared to the PAVS:
EZone Tour 98 - much heavier, yet more plush. Slower to wield. I served better with this racquet than the PAVS, but my groundstrokes were all over the place. I actually loved how this EZT felt, so much so that I brought one home for myself to see if I could work it into my hitting style, but for whatever reason the new one hits even worse, and doesn't at all feel like the demo unit, so that experiment is over.
VCore 98 - very, very similar to the PAVS. I could actually switch to this stick and not skip a beat. Didn't pursue any further than demo because the I'm already invested in PAVS, which hits just a tiny bit better for me. Yonex is a little more comfortable on the arm. Great stick though!
Clash 98 - a whole different bird, didn't do anything for me.
Has anybody been swinging the new Pure Aero VS 2020 lately? It's such a versatile stick. One of Bab's best sticks in my opinion.
I have a PA tour and it is much less accurate than the VS, less manœuvrable, less comfy etchave you hit with the 2019 Pure Aero? curious to hear what you think because i found it to be even better than the PA VS across the board
Hey. Yeah, I've hit the Pure Aero (2019), and I really like it. To be honest, I think it's a fantastic stick. My one little bother is how wide apart the mains are, especially in the middle of the string bed. Even the Pure Drive mains are slightly tighter than the Pure Aero mains. However, if you're using the write strokes, technique, and such, you can do some serious damage with the Pure Aero. To be honest, I really wish the Pure Aero would go back to the previous Aero Pro drill pattern, but you never know. I'm definitely looking forward to the release of the signature frame of Rafa in early 2021. I think it's pretty much an update to the 2019 version, probably with same 2019 drill pattern, but it will have the amazing starburst paint job Rafa has been swinging since March of this year. Cheers!have you hit with the 2019 Pure Aero? curious to hear what you think because i found it to be even better than the PA VS across the board
Yeah, with good mental balance and physique you can win with a toy racquet but that doesn’t automatically qualify you to know too much about different frames.11.9 UTR and have been playing tennis for almost 15 years, but what do I know lol...
**Review Continued**
Serves: Serving was one of my favorite aspects of the new Aero VS. The excellent stability, relatively open 16x20 string pattern, crisp response, decent plow though, and fantastic maneuverability make this frame a real weapon on serve. My second serves really benefited from this frame. I was able to hit really good kickers up the “T” on the deuce side (right-handed) and even better kick serves out wide on the “Ad side.” As far as flat first serves were concerned, I could torque up my speed and velocity a good amount to hit very good first serves. However, I come back to the area of customization again. You’re going to get more mphs out of this frame if you up the static and swing weight just a bit. The added mass will literally serve you well, pun intended, haha. That mentioned, there is a trade-off for added weight. You might lose some of the maneuverability and ease of spin access, but that is personal to each player. Overall, this is a great racquet in stock form, but customization is definitely an option for someone looking for a little more free power and stability against harder hit balls, like 5.5 and up levels.
Returns: With this new frame in hand, I was able to get this racquet on most serves. The excellent maneuverability allowed me to be very fast in my reactions on return. Now, I was very fond of this racquet on return. However, with the slightly lighter weight than I’m used to, I really had to commit to my returns. I couldn’t just rely on the mass of the racquet to do the hard part for me. I felt the stability was good against most serves, first serves included, but like I said earlier, I had to commit to my return stroke. I found it more difficult to block returns back against really big serves unless I truly committed and found the sweet spot. When this was the case, there was absolutely no problem. As I’ve said before, I think added weight in the hoop would do wonderful things for my returns and this frame in general. That said, I still really liked it in stock form. The only issue with adding weight is that it will slow down the racquet a little bit. So there is definitely a trade-off, especially if maneuverability is important to you in a racquet. In my opinion, with my frame with no weight customization, I would say 52 pounds is as high as you should go with a 16 gauge polyester, like RPM Blast. To slightly increase comfort and maybe slightly expand the sweet spot you could lower the tension to the high 40s. However, if adding weight (tungsten tape) is an option for you, then the added weight would probably increase the comfort, thus making 52 pound tension feel a little more plush while also reining in some of the power created by the added mass.
Overall Impressions: Well, let’s just say, I’m definitely switching to this new Pure Aero VS. To be honest, I feel like it does everything well. This frame does an excellent job of finding a great balance between maneuverability while still providing plow through, also creating a fantastic balance of providing a stable racquet with decent weight, while not being too stiff or too flexy, finding a balance between control and power in a 16x20 string pattern that allows for excellent spin, control, precision/depth, while also giving you the ability to rip powerful shots when you provide the right technique. This is why I have thoroughly enjoyed this frame. It seems to check most, if not all boxes, for me. Now, no racquet is perfect, just like nothing is perfect. However, I feel this racquet would definitely thrive with weight customization if the level of play goes up, which would be a slightly higher static weight and a slightly higher swing weight, while maintaining a balance that is head light. In my own opinion, I plan to keep playing it without any added weight for the time being, but I may customize a little bit in the future. Personally I like the current weight and balance and want more time to get used to it before making any weight/customization changes. Overall, if playing this racquet in stock form, I would string it absolutely no higher than 52 pounds with RPM Blast. To slightly increase comfort and maybe expand the sweet spot just a touch, I’d string it down in the high 40’s to low 50’s at highest. Anyways, I’m stoked Babolat released this new Pure Aero VS version. I think this racquet will be a real winner for intermediate to advanced players looking to control matches and win points with a versatile weapon that can allow you to hang back and retrieve when needed on defense, but then also dictate from the first strike if you play a more aggressive style. No matter what, if you bring your lunch pail to the courts each day, along with some decent technique, I feel this racquet will bring out the best in your game because you will get out of it what you put into it. As a tennis player, the player dictates their own success out on the court. There is no racquet or magic wand that magically makes you a better player. That said, when a player finds a racquet that enables him/her to bring out some of the best aspects of that player’s game, which ultimately leads to the player believing in their equipment, that is when the connection between a player and their chosen racquet can make a difference. In my opinion, this new Pure Aero VS is a difference maker. I hope you get the opportunity to give it a test drive to see if it fits your own game. Keep going for your shots.
Final Comments:
This new Pure Aero VS is sure to meet the needs of many intermediate and advanced players, whether on the public rec courts, high school courts, college courts, and/or even on the ATP/WTA courts. As is true of so many Babolat frames, they are extremely versatile for a greater range of player levels, while allowing you to personalize your racquet to your ideal static weight, swing weight, and balance.
Lastly, I personally really like how Babolat is providing matched racquets within 1 gram of each other. In my opinion, having racquets that are basically identical spec wise can definitely make a difference for a player at the higher levels of tennis, where the margins become more slight, the higher you go. Not to mention, the racquets are much easier to customize to the same spec (weight, swing weight, balance) when starting from the same starting point. Awesome job, Babolat!
-Johnny Goss (BabPlayer-JohnnyG)
Bab Hit Squad
I’m still loving my 2020 Pure Aero VS. Anybody else enjoying it? I went back to my original set-up with a VS Original over grip wrapped over a syntec team replacement grip and still nothing like it! Keep swinging away!
After playing with wilsom pro staff for 20 years I decided to change to Bab PAVS. I needed a lighter and more manageable racket.
I strung with Dunlop synthetic gut 25/24 and it was a bad choice. The ball doesn't seem to come out of the strings. I cut the strings and put in Babolat 1.3 RPM 21/21. Now it is much better, I have more power and it feels softer to hit.
I'm slowly getting used to it. Some of the shots I hit better than the Wilsom, mainly back slice and slice serve. I still have trouble with balls where I don't hit the middle of the string. I often hit the top of the racket and when that happens I feel the vibration in my arm. I'm thinking of putting some weight on it make it more massive. What do you guys think?
Thank you
Daniel
**Review Continued**
Serves: Serving was one of my favorite aspects of the new Aero VS. The excellent stability, relatively open 16x20 string pattern, crisp response, decent plow though, and fantastic maneuverability make this frame a real weapon on serve. My second serves really benefited from this frame. I was able to hit really good kickers up the “T” on the deuce side (right-handed) and even better kick serves out wide on the “Ad side.” As far as flat first serves were concerned, I could torque up my speed and velocity a good amount to hit very good first serves. However, I come back to the area of customization again. You’re going to get more mphs out of this frame if you up the static and swing weight just a bit. The added mass will literally serve you well, pun intended, haha. That mentioned, there is a trade-off for added weight. You might lose some of the maneuverability and ease of spin access, but that is personal to each player. Overall, this is a great racquet in stock form, but customization is definitely an option for someone looking for a little more free power and stability against harder hit balls, like 5.5 and up levels.
Returns: With this new frame in hand, I was able to get this racquet on most serves. The excellent maneuverability allowed me to be very fast in my reactions on return. Now, I was very fond of this racquet on return. However, with the slightly lighter weight than I’m used to, I really had to commit to my returns. I couldn’t just rely on the mass of the racquet to do the hard part for me. I felt the stability was good against most serves, first serves included, but like I said earlier, I had to commit to my return stroke. I found it more difficult to block returns back against really big serves unless I truly committed and found the sweet spot. When this was the case, there was absolutely no problem. As I’ve said before, I think added weight in the hoop would do wonderful things for my returns and this frame in general. That said, I still really liked it in stock form. The only issue with adding weight is that it will slow down the racquet a little bit. So there is definitely a trade-off, especially if maneuverability is important to you in a racquet. In my opinion, with my frame with no weight customization, I would say 52 pounds is as high as you should go with a 16 gauge polyester, like RPM Blast. To slightly increase comfort and maybe slightly expand the sweet spot you could lower the tension to the high 40s. However, if adding weight (tungsten tape) is an option for you, then the added weight would probably increase the comfort, thus making 52 pound tension feel a little more plush while also reining in some of the power created by the added mass.
Overall Impressions: Well, let’s just say, I’m definitely switching to this new Pure Aero VS. To be honest, I feel like it does everything well. This frame does an excellent job of finding a great balance between maneuverability while still providing plow through, also creating a fantastic balance of providing a stable racquet with decent weight, while not being too stiff or too flexy, finding a balance between control and power in a 16x20 string pattern that allows for excellent spin, control, precision/depth, while also giving you the ability to rip powerful shots when you provide the right technique. This is why I have thoroughly enjoyed this frame. It seems to check most, if not all boxes, for me. Now, no racquet is perfect, just like nothing is perfect. However, I feel this racquet would definitely thrive with weight customization if the level of play goes up, which would be a slightly higher static weight and a slightly higher swing weight, while maintaining a balance that is head light. In my own opinion, I plan to keep playing it without any added weight for the time being, but I may customize a little bit in the future. Personally I like the current weight and balance and want more time to get used to it before making any weight/customization changes. Overall, if playing this racquet in stock form, I would string it absolutely no higher than 52 pounds with RPM Blast. To slightly increase comfort and maybe expand the sweet spot just a touch, I’d string it down in the high 40’s to low 50’s at highest. Anyways, I’m stoked Babolat released this new Pure Aero VS version. I think this racquet will be a real winner for intermediate to advanced players looking to control matches and win points with a versatile weapon that can allow you to hang back and retrieve when needed on defense, but then also dictate from the first strike if you play a more aggressive style. No matter what, if you bring your lunch pail to the courts each day, along with some decent technique, I feel this racquet will bring out the best in your game because you will get out of it what you put into it. As a tennis player, the player dictates their own success out on the court. There is no racquet or magic wand that magically makes you a better player. That said, when a player finds a racquet that enables him/her to bring out some of the best aspects of that player’s game, which ultimately leads to the player believing in their equipment, that is when the connection between a player and their chosen racquet can make a difference. In my opinion, this new Pure Aero VS is a difference maker. I hope you get the opportunity to give it a test drive to see if it fits your own game. Keep going for your shots.
Final Comments:
This new Pure Aero VS is sure to meet the needs of many intermediate and advanced players, whether on the public rec courts, high school courts, college courts, and/or even on the ATP/WTA courts. As is true of so many Babolat frames, they are extremely versatile for a greater range of player levels, while allowing you to personalize your racquet to your ideal static weight, swing weight, and balance.
Lastly, I personally really like how Babolat is providing matched racquets within 1 gram of each other. In my opinion, having racquets that are basically identical spec wise can definitely make a difference for a player at the higher levels of tennis, where the margins become more slight, the higher you go. Not to mention, the racquets are much easier to customize to the same spec (weight, swing weight, balance) when starting from the same starting point. Awesome job, Babolat!
-Johnny Goss (BabPlayer-JohnnyG)
Bab Hit Squad
Who is still using the 2020 Pure Aero VS? I'm curious on your current set-ups and if you play it customized or not. Lately, I've been stringing RPM Blast 16g at 50 pounds, Bab dampener with no insert, and using the regular Syntec Pro replacement grip and Pro Tour Over grip. I don't add weight, but I think the stick is perfect for customization. It's really my favorite racquet that I've ever used, but I'm interested on your thoughts as well, pros and cons. I know it's not for everyone, but just wanted to inquire. Keep swinging away!!!
Who is still using the 2020 Pure Aero VS? I'm curious on your current set-ups and if you play it customized or not. Lately, I've been stringing RPM Blast 16g at 50 pounds, Bab dampener with no insert, and using the regular Syntec Pro replacement grip and Pro Tour Over grip. I don't add weight, but I think the stick is perfect for customization. It's really my favorite racquet that I've ever used, but I'm interested on your thoughts as well, pros and cons. I know it's not for everyone, but just wanted to inquire. Keep swinging away!!!
That's great to hear. I'm a 2-hander on the backhand. The backhand is my strongest wing, and probably my favorite shot to hit with the pure aero vs. What about you? What's your fave shot? You got a 1-hand or 2-handed bh? All the best!Are you a 1HB or 2HBer ? I am trying to purchase this stick again but babolat is having supply issues. I believe it played best with 3-4gr at 12 in order to bring balance from 31,5 to 32 unstrung…. cause it felt that all the weight was on the handle/throat area…. despite that it was pretty stable. My favourite babolat since aero pro drive by far. Keep enjoying it mate.
All my shots were top notch with aero vs except my one hand backhand. This is probably due to the HL balance. I also didn’t have confidence on drop shots. I loved the racquet because i managed my best result against a 5.5 player…. great energy return. Even better than pure aero. But when i wanted to drive my 1HB down the line flat shot was difficult to control…. outside sweet spot ball could easily fly away. Maybe i should have tried it with lead at 3/9 and 12 to give it more mass on the head…..That's great to hear. I'm a 2-hander on the backhand. The backhand is my strongest wing, and probably my favorite shot to hit with the pure aero vs. What about you? What's your fave shot? You got a 1-hand or 2-handed bh? All the best!
how much lead do you think its fine at 10 and 2? Only at this locations?I definitely prefer the VS with weight added to the head. Just a couple of grams divided between 10 and 2 made a significant difference. In addition to added stability and enlarged sweet spot, it hit a heavier and more penetrating ball. It also added more pop on flat serves.
Good idea I have reels of blue RPM Power 125 and Hyper G soft 120try even slightly softer than razor code. also razor code is slightly springy, gives good power, but aero vs doesn't need more power. try element or rpm power, or hyper g or ptp if you like them
try even slightly softer than razor code. also razor code is slightly springy, gives good power, but aero vs doesn't need more power. try element or rpm power, or hyper g or ptp if you like them
I use racquet head tape instead of lead tape, so I’m not sure exactly how much. The tape weighs about 1 gram per 3 inches and I put about 4 inches, so about 1.3 grams at 10 and another at 1.3 grams at 2. I also use an over grip which helps keep the frame from getting too head heavy.how much lead do you think its fine at 10 and 2? Only at this locations?
Let me know how it works, I also realize that this frame need some weight at 12 or 10 and 2, thanksI use racquet head tape instead of lead tape, so I’m not sure exactly how much. The tape weighs about 1 gram per 3 inches and I put about 4 inches, so about 1.3 grams at 10 and another at 1.3 grams at 2. I also use an over grip which helps keep the frame from getting too head heavy.
I like 10 and 2 because it raises the sweet spot and increases stability. Since I tend to hit serves higher on the racquet face, the higher sweet spot definitely helps with that.
Non advanced player who has just realized round & slick is king checking inin my experience all frames work best with round or almost round strings, but I am an advanced player who doesn't need "more spin"
Hey All, Do you grip up higher on the handle for your forehand grip, a la Jack Sock, or do you like to grip down on the handle, like Rafa? I think I fall somewhere in between. I recently think it feels better to grip lower on a dryer grip like with the vs original over grip, like Rafa (He's pretty extreme with like a pinky close to hanging off.), versus doing the same thing with a tackier over grip. I know it's a random topic. The syntec pro and vs original over grip combo is hard to beat no matter what. I'm still loving the Pure Aero VS, and it keeps picking up more followers, especially on the ATP.Who is still using the 2020 Pure Aero VS? I'm curious on your current set-ups and if you play it customized or not. Lately, I've been stringing RPM Blast 16g at 50 pounds, Bab dampener with no insert, and using the regular Syntec Pro replacement grip and Pro Tour Over grip. I don't add weight, but I think the stick is perfect for customization. It's really my favorite racquet that I've ever used, but I'm interested on your thoughts as well, pros and cons. I know it's not for everyone, but just wanted to inquire. Keep swinging away!!!
Ok thank you for your input. I guess it has too thin beam for that swing weight on stock form. Other option is that your racquet is underspec. Haven't you tried to add some weight on it?I've been trying really hard to like this racquet with multiple different string setups and my conclusion is that the sweet spot feels small. My main racket is Pure Strike 16x19 Gen 3, so overall am a big fan of Babolat. On a pure strike, with my groundstrokes 2/3 land in the sweet spot on average, with PAVS it's about 1/4. Not sure if anyone has experienced this as well. I'm an aggressive baseliner and would love to have a 'Pure Strike with more top spin', but I may need to go the Pure Strike 100 for that instead.
Yes, I've tried putting 2 grams each on 3 and 9. Made it less manoeuvrable for me and didn't help with the 'sweet spot' accessOk thank you for your input. I guess it has too thin beam for that swing weight on stock form. Other option is that your racquet is underspec. Haven't you tried to add some weight on it?