my sweet federer can win 25 slams

[bdawg]

I think Federer can win 25 slams.

Consider this inerrant logic:

Suppose Federer wins 4 slams for the next four years. That would lead him to 25 slams by the time he's 29!

He's already won the Australian, Wimbledon and the US OPEN. So let's assume that he'll automatically win these slams for the next four years. All there's left is to conquer is Roland Garros. Winning in Paris will come easily next year as Federer has improved against Nadal. Nadal is continually losing on hardcourts and his confidence has been shot. As a result, Federer willl beat Nadal and win 4 French open titles in a row (with the flawless logic that if he can beat Nadal he can beat everyone else).

By my arguments it seems not only plausible that Federer can win four consecutive Grand Slams but it's most likely probable.

Oh how you Nadal fans are going to regret playing my sweet federer.

It is not creepy, in any way, to refer to Federer as "sweet".

 

[Zets147]

"My" sweet federer can win 26 slams. In the year 2007, Nadal will be charged with doping in the finals of the 2006 FO and therefore granting Federer the title. While it is obvious that my Federer will win every grand slam tournament in the next four year.... ok I don't want to type this anymore.. lol

 

[Richie Rich]

I think Federer can win 25 slams.

Consider this inerrant logic:

Suppose Federer wins 4 slams for the next four years. That would lead him to 25 slams by the time he's 29!

He's already won the Australian, Wimbledon and the US OPEN. So let's assume that he'll automatically win these slams for the next four years. All there's left is to conquer is Roland Garros. Winning in Paris will come easily next year as Federer has improved against Nadal. Nadal is continually losing on hardcourts and his confidence has been shot. As a result, Federer willl beat Nadal and win 4 French open titles in a row (with the flawless logic that if he can beat Nadal he can beat everyone else).

By my arguments it seems not only plausible that Federer can win four consecutive Grand Slams but it's most likely probable.

Oh how you Nadal fans are going to regret playing my sweet federer.

It is not creepy, in any way, to refer to Federer as "sweet".

you really need to stop hanging around queen and parliament. all those drugs are bad for you - they make you sound like nadalgirl26 :wink:

 

[The Grand Slam]

wghat are youtalk ing aBout!1!! my swet,, sweet Nadal can steamorllo your ugly fede rer! he will win every grand salam next year! ferderer is the one that is oging to be charged wirh taking drugs!!!!!!!

 

[Jack the Hack]

"Sarcasm is the lowest form of humor, but the highest form of wit."

- Oscar Wilde

I love this thread!

 

[Forehand Forever]

Have you ever thought that maybe within the next few years that everyone will pick up on Federers game? Then maybe professional tennis will be more exciting than just one man winning all the slams.

 

[alienhamster]

Have you ever thought that maybe within the next few years that everyone will pick up on Federers game? Then maybe professional tennis will be more exciting than just one man winning all the slams.

{Shhhh! You're ruining this wonderful extended joke on nadalgirl's posts. Try to play along. Oh, and P.S., love the signature! Andy's gonna be top 3 by year's end or by Wimbledon next year--no worries.}

 

[arosen]

Awww, you guys, are you picking on our sweet nadalgirl? How naughty of you.

 

[psamp14]

if your sweet federer can rack up 25, and nadalgirl said her sweet nadal was going to get 47, i'm sure someone's sweet sampras and laver are predicting coming out of retirement to get 100 for insurance purposes

 

[westside]

wghat are youtalk ing aBout!1!! my swet,, sweet Nadal can steamorllo your ugly fede rer! he will win every grand salam next year! ferderer is the one that is oging to be charged wirh taking drugs!!!!!!!

Haha nice

 

[Rataplan]

Awww, you guys, are you picking on our sweet nadalgirl? How naughty of you.

I think that you've got that backwards.
Does the picking on this poster and the sarcasm used against her seem to affect nadalgirl? Nope, she continues to start her threads.


Ever wonder why?
I see two options.
* She really is that naive and so, she doesn't even realise when she's been made fun of - the sarcasm goes over her head anyway.
* She's the one playing games by posting what are - obviously -over-the-top threads because she has fun seeing how people make fun of her and react to her but by doing so, many come across as at least as naive and dumb as she is.

To me, it's more likely that she's the one playing games, laughing behind her computer at all the reactions (serious or funny) she keeps getting.


FFS, just ignore her.

 

[Zets147]

Harmless fun anyways who cares lol

 

[8PAQ]

You guys better be talking about some other Federer because my sweet Roger Federer the #1 tennis player is all mine! So back off!!! GRRRRRR!!!!

 

[ksbh]

LOL! Yeah, why not!

I think Federer can win 25 slams.

Consider this inerrant logic:

Suppose Federer wins 4 slams for the next four years. That would lead him to 25 slams by the time he's 29!

He's already won the Australian, Wimbledon and the US OPEN. So let's assume that he'll automatically win these slams for the next four years. All there's left is to conquer is Roland Garros. Winning in Paris will come easily next year as Federer has improved against Nadal. Nadal is continually losing on hardcourts and his confidence has been shot. As a result, Federer willl beat Nadal and win 4 French open titles in a row (with the flawless logic that if he can beat Nadal he can beat everyone else).

By my arguments it seems not only plausible that Federer can win four consecutive Grand Slams but it's most likely probable.

Oh how you Nadal fans are going to regret playing my sweet federer.

It is not creepy, in any way, to refer to Federer as "sweet".

 

[pirateofthecarribean]

Roger is already beginning to fade. His confidence and skill are lower than his previous major. He's already hit the peak of his prime at 25 years old. There is no way he can win 4 every year for the next 4 years!

 

[crazylevity]

Roger is already beginning to fade. His confidence and skill are lower than his previous major. He's already hit the peak of his prime at 25 years old. There is no way he can win 4 every year for the next 4 years!

and you my friend, have no sense of humour. :mrgreen:

 

[pirateofthecarribean]

and you my friend, have no sense of humour. :mrgreen:

I don't like "stupid" humor, such as saying Roger will win 25 GS titles, cuz the probability of that is about 1 percent.

 

[crazylevity]

I don't like "stupid" humor, such as saying Roger will win 25 GS titles, cuz the probability of that is about 1 percent.

The OP was making a spoof of Nadalgirl26's ridiculous claim that Nadal will win 47 Slams. cuz the probability of that is about ZERO percent. Dude, like...get in the loop, u know?

 

[pirateofthecarribean]

The OP was making a spoof of Nadalgirl26's ridiculous claim that Nadal will win 47 Slams. cuz the probability of that is about ZERO percent. Dude, like...get in the loop, u know?

Look, I'm 22 years old. I'm a mature adolescent. I don't like stupid children's games, and I never will. Nough said!

 

[crazylevity]

Well fine, then don't reply it. I'm a 23 year old undergraduate, and plenty of people on this board are older than you. If you don't like it, don't read it. But there isn't a need to stuff it.

 

[BaselDazzle]

Look, I'm 22 years old. I'm a mature adolescent. I don't like stupid children's games, and I never will. Nough said!

At 22? Really?

 

[Breaker]

omg you are so riht sweet sweet federrrererererebannanahanabophanaererereetetette will easily win tat many cauz his hair is soo cool and his feet are so manly smelling yes i wold no personally loloolol

 

[slack hack]

I won't be suprised if Federer becomes the first player
to win 26 slams in one calender Year!!!

 

[Backbored]

Look, I'm 22 years old. I'm a mature adolescent. I don't like stupid children's games, and I never will. Nough said!

If this is true why are you posting on a thread that you believe is childish? So far, I see no proof that you are as mature as you claim. This could change and I hope it does. It's up to you.

 

[pirateofthecarribean]

If this is true why are you posting on a thread that you believe is childish? So far, I see no proof that you are as mature as you claim. This could change and I hope it does. It's up to you.

I don't think everyone on this forum is childish. Sure, that are many childish people here, like the one who started this topic, who should be "stripped at lashed 800 times in public". But, there are also very mature and very wise people here as well.

 

[Zets147]

I guess sense of humor wilts away as you get older?..... I'm four...

 

[Backbored]

I don't think everyone on this forum is childish. Sure, that are many childish people here, like the one who started this topic, who should be "stripped at lashed 800 times in public". But, there are also very mature and very wise people here as well.

Very well said.

"stripped at lashed 800 times in public"

Umm maybe you are more mature than I first thought.:mrgreen:

 

[DismalFuture]

He's getting there. Our lord and savior can do anything.

 

[BeatlesFan]

I think Federer can win 25 slams.

The chances of any 36 year old to win 6 more majors is so small as to be invisible. I hope Fed fans don't morph into doing what Djoker fans did for so long, i.e., ridiculously inflating their potential slam wins. Even if the useless generation of pros continues to do nothing, it will be next to impossible for Fed to get anywhere near 25 slams.

 

[deBroglie]

The chances of any 36 year old to win 6 more majors is so small as to be invisible. I hope Fed fans don't morph into doing what Djoker fans did for so long, i.e., ridiculously inflating their potential slam wins. Even if the useless generation of pros continues to do nothing, it will be next to impossible for Fed to get anywhere near 25 slams.

It might have been a possibility...in 2006.

 

[BHServe]

It might have been a possibility...in 2006.

Totally. So many missed opportunities since then: ao09, uso09, wim 14-15, uso15 to name a few

 

[Nuclear]

my sweet federer

 

[guanzishou]

wghat are youtalk ing aBout!1!! my swet,, sweet Nadal can steamorllo your ugly fede rer! he will win every grand salam next year! ferderer is the one that is oging to be charged wirh taking drugs!!!!!!!

What the heck is "steamorllo"?

 

[Jonesy]

I think Federer can win 25 slams.

Consider this inerrant logic:

Suppose Federer wins 4 slams for the next four years. That would lead him to 25 slams by the time he's 29!

He's already won the Australian, Wimbledon and the US OPEN. So let's assume that he'll automatically win these slams for the next four years. All there's left is to conquer is Roland Garros. Winning in Paris will come easily next year as Federer has improved against Nadal. Nadal is continually losing on hardcourts and his confidence has been shot. As a result, Federer willl beat Nadal and win 4 French open titles in a row (with the flawless logic that if he can beat Nadal he can beat everyone else).

By my arguments it seems not only plausible that Federer can win four consecutive Grand Slams but it's most likely probable.

Oh how you Nadal fans are going to regret playing my sweet federer.

It is not creepy, in any way, to refer to Federer as "sweet".

Mirka?

 

[MrFlip]

He should have been close

AO 2005
US Open 2009
Wimb 2019

 

[Sudacafan]

 

[ghostofMecir]

He should have been close

AO 2005
US Open 2009
Wimb 2019

AO 2009 and Wimby 2008 were coin tosses as well. 2015 USO he lost on BPs. Really should have had 22-23 at least.

 

[Sudacafan]

wghat are youtalk ing aBout!1!! my swet,, sweet Nadal can steamorllo your ugly fede rer! he will win every grand salam next year! ferderer is the one that is oging to be charged wirh taking drugs!!!!!!!

Good to see you again, Skypadq! Your style has somewhat changed.

 

[MrFlip]

AO 2009 and Wimby 2008 were coin tosses as well. 2015 USO he lost on BPs. Really should have had 22-23 at least.

Wimb 2008 for sure, he had at least 2-3 chances to break in the fifth.
AO 2009 he was being dominated by a tired Nadal. If Nadal was fresh Fed would have got rolled in straight sets.

USO 2015 - it should have gone 5 sets at least

 

[StilltheGOAT]

Totally. So many missed opportunities since then: ao09, uso09, wim 14-15, uso15 to name a few

And add Wimby 19 to make it 25

 

[Adam Copeland]

The chances of any 36 year old to win 6 more majors is so small as to be invisible. I hope Fed fans don't morph into doing what Djoker fans did for so long, i.e., ridiculously inflating their potential slam wins. Even if the useless generation of pros continues to do nothing, it will be next to impossible for Fed to get anywhere near 25 slams.

 

[Tshooter]

 

[Novichok]

my sweet federer

Why are you going around bumping random threads?

EDIT: Maybe because the current threads are too boring?

 

[slipgrip93]

If Fed gets some sci-fi knee regeneration drugs or nano in the year 2022 AD, and then switches back to his k90, I'd think his chances for 5-10 more slams doubles. Or he just has to get back to his 2017 and 2019 wimb form, minus the "40-15" hangup.

 

[Frenchy-Player]

@MrFlip cool avatar

 

[Sudacafan]

Why are you going around bumping random threads?

It's the new trend in TTW. The most sought threads are those with only a couple of posts of more than 12 years old. Like aged scotch.

 

[Nadal_Django]

My sweet Federer. WTH

 

[safinmafia]

Staying at 20.

 

[ghostofMecir]

Wimb 2008 for sure, he had at least 2-3 chances to break in the fifth.
AO 2009 he was being dominated by a tired Nadal. If Nadal was fresh Fed would have got rolled in straight sets.

USO 2015 - it should have gone 5 sets at least

Hard to say Nadal was dominating when Federer dominated the first four sets except messing up BPs as per usual.

Overall points won: Federer 174, Nadal 173
Dominance ratio: Federer 1.02
Through 4 sets: Federer 158, Nadal 144

Even AFTER a 6-2 final set in which Nadal won many, many more points than Federer did Federer wound up winning the dominance ratio. You don’t see many matches in which a player handily loses a fifth set 6-2 yet wins more points overall as well as the domiance raTio.

Now Nadal deserved to win, but Federer outplayed Nadal overall over 4 sets only to be tied in sets.

 

[Deleted member 629564]

my sweet federer

My sweet Federer. WTH

Once sweet Federer met salty Djokovic his sweet record is no longer sweet.
It's become rather bitter.