My TC95 Review

For the last couple of weeks, I have been trying to stick to my TC97s and truly assess them. It is a nice frame no doubt and you do get good power, comfort and feel. I find you have to be a bit careful stringing the TC97. For me, a medium firmness poly at least and strung @50lbs or higher. That is the minimum for me or else with the flexy head, i find i get to much trampoline effect. I picked up my TC95 today for the first time in at least two weeks and i just love this frame. Simply put it ups the precision and control both in depth and laterally. My game is more all court with an emphasis to control points and truly dictate the pace. I like to hit with emphasis all the time and sometimes just going all out in the right time. This frame is absolutely perfect in every meaningful sense of tennis for me. Did i mention i love this frame?
Well that seals it. I'm sticking with my TC95. Gotta admit, the TC97 has been enticing me since Nov, but I just play so well with the TC95. The precision and maneuverability are top notch and I can swing all out and drop the ball in the court without fear. Plus, my 1HBH has actually improved since I made the switch.
 
As an aside, I just got a PS85 for Christmas (for fun) and, though it's the heaviest frame I've ever owned, swings incredibly fast in the living room. How does it compare to the TC95? Both are foam filled, classic construction frames.
 
I prefer the PS85 hands down. The TC95 swings too heavy for me. There's something about that thin beam and the 85 just makes it play so much lighter than its weight
 
I prefer the PS85 hands down. The TC95 swings too heavy for me. There's something about that thin beam and the 85 just makes it play so much lighter than its weight
I don’t know what specs you tried but my TC95s swing easy and quick. It is hands down the best frame i have ever used bar none including the PS85.
 
I prefer the PS85 hands down. The TC95 swings too heavy for me. There's something about that thin beam and the 85 just makes it play so much lighter than its weight

I don’t know what specs you tried but my TC95s swing easy and quick. It is hands down the best frame i have ever used bar none including the PS85.

Well it looks like I'll have fun deciding for myself. I'm anticipating the PS85 to be just as comfortable and stable, more powerful (due to weight), less forgiving, and less maneuverable.
 
Well it looks like I'll have fun deciding for myself. I'm anticipating the PS85 to be just as comfortable and stable, more powerful (due to weight), less forgiving, and less maneuverable.
It was a dalliance with a friends PS85 last march that made me think I need to look at the TC95... I loved the foam filled "thunk"... though the ps85 is a tad too stiff for me I loved the easy power when you line it up. It is a great stick if you have kill shots and good footwork but not really a returner's stick... the TC 95 should have more forgiveness and perhaps less oomf when lined up but still a "servers" server's stick. Curious how you think they compare because the ps 85 is an all time great by which all things are compared. havent played in a few weeks because of holidays... though Ive done serve and wall practice... kinda don't want to play till I can get the TC95...
 
Can any of you guys/gals compare the tc95 and a head ig youtek prestige pro?...power, spin, control, etc.
 
Can any of you guys/gals compare the tc95 and a head ig youtek prestige pro?...power, spin, control, etc.
I'll be able to once I get my TC95. First of all the prestige will be stiffer than either the 63RA or 70 RA (translates to RA58 and RA 65 strung). Also, I used both the pro and MP for years and prestiges are extremely even tempered sticks... ie no big hotspots etc.

Some of this is physics though so I can give you some general expectations:

The TC95 16x19 will be similar but has a bigger sweetspot and probably a little more power. The foam filled TC 95 will have a different response... a thunk when you hit the ball whereas prestiges with similar strings etc will be a little less muted. The TC 95 has a somewhat larger headsize too... its really a 96sq in., whereas the Head is a 95sq in. The TC 95 will have more thump than a Head PP if they are set up the same.

Would have to try them both set up the same way (weight balanace, strings) to compare spin and more specific performances characteristics.
 
I'll be able to once I get my TC95. First of all the prestige will be stiffer than either the 63RA or 70 RA (translates to RA58 and RA 65 strung). Also, I used both the pro and MP for years and prestiges are extremely even tempered sticks... ie no big hotspots etc.

Some of this is physics though so I can give you some general expectations:

The TC95 16x19 will be similar but has a bigger sweetspot and probably a little more power. The foam filled TC 95 will have a different response... a thunk when you hit the ball whereas prestiges with similar strings etc will be a little less muted. The TC 95 has a somewhat larger headsize too... its really a 96sq in., whereas the Head is a 95sq in. The TC 95 will have more thump than a Head PP if they are set up the same.

Would have to try them both set up the same way (weight balanace, strings) to compare spin and more specific performances characteristics.
Thanks for the response backhand compliment. I'm looking forward to your comparison. I've used the head PP for the last 3 years or so. Prior to that I used the 4 stripe POG Mids for 20 plus years,which are also foam filled like the tc95. I like the head PP but miss the feel of the old POGs. I am also looking for something that might have a little more pop/power.
 
Played last night with fresh square-x @50lbs in my TC95. This string setup plays with a bit more power then the quadro twist. Still walloping spin when needed and very good at flattening out again when needed. I like both string setups except maybe go up with square-x to 52lbs to offset some of the additional power. Square-x does give additional pop on serve so you can really blast away on flat first serves. I was definitely getting some additional heat.
 
Holy smokes serving with the square-x on the TC95. I’m wondering if i’ll see vapor trails lool..ok, an exaggeration but serve is wicked for sure. I enjoy the TC97 but I am reaching the conclusion that for me the TC95 rains supreme. It has the power, control, precision quotients in perfect harmony. The TC97 has a bit more forgiveness and power but not the level of precision or control. You actually loose a bit of power on the TC97 because you hold back a bit on swings worried you’ll spray the ball. The TC95 has no faults as far as i’m concerned.
 
That's interesting topspn - I found that the Square-X plays with less power than the Quadro Twist in my TC97. However, I also preferred it (mainly for the feel).
 
That's interesting topspn - I found that the Square-X plays with less power than the Quadro Twist in my TC97. However, I also preferred it (mainly for the feel).

YTEX rates the square-x more on power. I have both TC95s @50lb with one in quadro twist and the other in square-x. I agree the square-x feels a little more arm friendly but it is the most powerful string in my current poly collection. I may be getting to the end of my experimenting on my TC97s and selling them. It is pretty hard for me to let go of the TC95 that is just sublime.
 
YTEX rates the square-x more on power. I have both TC95s @50lb with one in quadro twist and the other in square-x. I agree the square-x feels a little more arm friendly but it is the most powerful string in my current poly collection. I may be getting to the end of my experimenting on my TC97s and selling them. It is pretty hard for me to let go of the TC95 that is just sublime.
all of the string advice is helpful and I should have my TC95 in a few days
 
I'm stringing one of my TC95s with RS Lyon to see how it plays in that frame
Yeah very curious about RS Lyon (when I revamped my FH 6 years ago I pattered it on Soderling's), Hyper G and a couple of others Like Yonex Poly Tour HS and maybe Kisrchbaum max power... On my current frame Im using Yonex Poly Tour Pro 1.25 black crossed with scorpion because I really like YPTP but its too muted... also my Pacific is epic low powered so the Scorpion gives it more zing. Probably wont be as much need for zing on the TC95 so I want something still control oriented. Also something that has a bit of that syn gut pocketing that YPTP and Scorpion have with good spin and feel yet poly control and spin.
 
Last edited:
My TC95 is sitting on an unpacked pallet at the post office. Ill go back there later today to pick it up... otherwise I have to wait till tomorrow for delivery. Its raining here anyways Friday it might be dry and Ill work on re-weighting it. Monday Ive got court time scheduled for a full shakedown against a good opponent.
 
RS Lyon was the first string I tried in my TC95 when it was brand new. A word of caution, that string is very soft, so you might want to go up several pounds above your normal tension.

Yeah, I’ve played with it before on the TC97 @50lbs and liked it. You are right it is somehow very comfortable yet has a medium firmness. For instance, the hyper-g is very soft in comparison. I don’t know how RS Lyon pulls off medium firm crisp comfortable feel. Really like this string.
 
Yeah, I’ve played with it before on the TC97 @50lbs and liked it. You are right it is somehow very comfortable yet has a medium firmness. For instance, the hyper-g is very soft in comparison. I don’t know how RS Lyon pulls off medium firm crisp comfortable feel. Really like this string.
Intrigued though I like to string lower... around 45lbs. Just got my TC95 from the mailman... gorgeous paint.... it is like a jaguar car! Just lovely (black grommets/bumper). Weighting it up now. It is strung at 45 with Luxilon adrenaline but RS Lyon, Hyper G and Weisscannon Red Ghost are on my list.
 
Last edited:
Yeah very curious about RS Lyon (when I revamped my FH 6 years ago I pattered it on Soderling's), Hyper G and a couple of others Like Yonex Poly Tour HS and maybe Kisrchbaum max power... On my current frame Im using Yonex Poly Tour Pro 1.25 black crossed with scorpion because I really like YPTP but its too muted... also my Pacific is epic low powered so the Scorpion gives it more zing. Probably wont be as much need for zing on the TC95 so I want something still control oriented. Also something that has a bit of that syn gut pocketing that YPTP and Scorpion have with good spin and feel yet poly control and spin.

Played with RS Lyon last night @50lbs in TC95. Very comfortable with good control and does give power when you hit the gas. Served great with it right away and hit with no reservations. I like this string even more in the TC95
 
Played with RS Lyon last night @50lbs in TC95. Very comfortable with good control and does give power when you hit the gas. Served great with it right away and hit with no reservations. I like this string even more in the TC95
sounds good! Nice it is a TW exclusive... we give all this free advertising to Angell but TW you know we are buying our insane tennis geek strings that are relatively obscure from you.
 
I have only tried 2 strings on my TC95 18x20, the first was Signum Pro Tornado 17ga which I liked a lot but later after recommendation from my stringer I tried Signum Pro Firestorm 17ga and felt it was better than the Tornado.

Strung at 54/52 lbs it felt very comfortable and crisp with great ball pocketing. The only con is the metallic ping which cab be easily remedied by a dampener.
 
Any lead placement tips?
i had to add a lot of weight to the handle, a rather small amount to 3&9 and an incredibly tiny amount to 12:00, that last bit really made it come alive serving-wise. I play on Monday and can give you more detail as I dial this in but so far 97% of the weight added in the handle and it is at 8pts hl. Frsnkly, it might not need any lead in the hoop for most people but i swing a very heavy stick and return big so twist weight is important.
Anyone play with a 63 and 70 RA TC95 that can speak to comparative power levels?
I forget where but I remember when I was doing my research that the difference for the 16 by 19 frames there was very little power separation between the two RA... at least on serve.. mostly it is a feel thing. For ra63 you can sense it and you can carve the ball in a way only sub 60Ra strung can.
 
Last edited:
i had to add a lot of weight to the handle, a rather small amount to 3&9 and an incredibly tiny amount to 12:00, that last bit really made it come alive serving-wise. I play on Monday and can give you more detail as I dial this in but so far 97% of the weight added in the handle and it is at 8pts hl. Frsnkly, it might not need any lead in the hoop for most people but i swing a very heavy stick and return big so twist weight is important.
I forget where but I remember when I was doing my research that the difference for the 16 by 19 frames there was very little power separation between the two RA... at least on serve.. mostly it is a feel thing. For ra63 you can sense it and you can carve the ball in a way only sub 60Ra strung can.

I remember you once saying something about your preferred weight around 12.5-12.6 oz. The 330g TC95 once strung, overgrip and dampner is right at 12.5oz. Did you get a lighter frame and bringing weight up?
 
I remember you once saying something about your preferred weight around 12.5-12.6 oz. The 330g TC95 once strung, overgrip and dampner is right at 12.5oz. Did you get a lighter frame and bringing weight up?
yeah, i got a near mint used one and brought it up to 12.5... still light for me. It has a B grip at 4 3/8. this helps ne sort out the grip as i was leaning towards A at 4 1/2 but unsure. Basically i wanted to sort some of this out if im going to order a new custom job from Paul. So far so good... gonna hit for hours tomorrow. Definitely a quality product and it serves really well... much more like my awesome serving becker london tour (55ra) than my pacific which has a 61 strung RA. there is this carving sensation with sun 60Ra sticks you either like or dont. thing is the Angell feels so solid like a ps85... the becker is more of a buggywhip! getting both the solidity and flex is what im after. So far so good, all of my hitting partners are eyeing a tc97 and my tc95 might just be the only angell they can try out here in the rainy pacific northwest.
 
Last edited:
Mr. Angell must certainly possess some meteorological superpowers if his creations can "rain supreme".
It IS an el nino year and he is technically an Angell with the proper powers accorded to such a creature! (rimshot, crash cymbal)

seriously though it seems like his true power is a coupling of engineering ability/experience and listening to his segment of informed customers... something the big manufacturers have lost sight of or touch with.
 
Last edited:
I have played with three of his models and all were great. TC95 may even qualify Mr Angell as the racquet whisperer
Yeah, I think Paul definitely has a touch when it comes to mid plus frames... always has. My lil brother still plays with the max impact plus dunlop http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/dunlop-max-impact-pro-specs.54185/ The MW Max300g and Muscleweave 200g are classics but there is a sense of quality that goes beyond playability with the Angells.... so yeah better materials and build quality.

I think part of his career was being charged to somehow find a way to make frames with the Max 200g characteristics (unusually large sweetspot, flexy yet very precise, stable, comfortable) without the grafil injection construction. This became the classic Dunlop frame personality. He used some of his old tricks and some new ones for the TC series.
 
Last edited:
I strung my TC95 with a NG / RS Lyon hybrid. The Lyon was too low powered and crisp enough feeling for me. YPTP was a much better cross for this frame. Anyone else try a NG hybrid in the TC95 63 RA frame?
 
I strung my TC95 with a NG / RS Lyon hybrid. The Lyon was too low powered and crisp enough feeling for me. YPTP was a much better cross for this frame. Anyone else try a NG hybrid in the TC95 63 RA frame?
After hitting today I want to try a full bed of Lyon in mine... just to temper the power a bit more.. is yours a 16x19 like mine? No way Im going to NG but I can see it if you like to slice a lot, dang does this thing carve it. Right now it is adrenaline at 45lbs. My go to main is YPTP crossed with Scorpion in my Pacific frames so good to know it works with the TC95.
 
Last edited:
After hitting today I want to try a full bed of Lyon in mine... just to temper the power a bit more.. is yours a 16x19 like mine? No way Im going to NG but I can see it if you like to slice a lot, dang does this thing carve it. Right now it is adrenaline at 45lbs. My go to main is YPTP crossed with Scorpion in my Pacific frames so good to know it works with the TC95.
It is 16x19. My frame is quite a bit lighter than yours at just under 12 oz. A full bed of Lyon could work well for you. Very arm friendly but I feel it could be too soft for the 63 flex.
 
Anyone play with a 63 and 70 RA TC95 that can speak to comparative power levels?
I have all the TC95 range. The 16x19 63ra seems a bit more powerful than the 70ra 16x19, having exactly the same specs, but 10kg/cm2 more SW. However, the comfort is amazing.

The 18x20 63ra has about the same power as the 16x19 70ra.

Imho the 18x20 63ra is the best. Power, control and comfort all in one. Amazing stick.
 
I have all the TC95 range. The 16x19 63ra seems a bit more powerful than the 70ra 16x19, having exactly the same specs, but 10kg/cm2 more SW. However, the comfort is amazing.

The 18x20 63ra has about the same power as the 16x19 70ra.

Imho the 18x20 63ra is the best. Power, control and comfort all in one. Amazing stick.
Really....that's surprising. I expected the stiffer racquet to have more inherent power, despite the small difference in swingweight. I have the 16x19 70RA. One of the reasons I chose this combo was for maneuverability. Does the 63RA have a noticeably less maneuverable feel? I find that with my TC95 I can get my racquet in position for any shot and it's a knife even on defense.
 
I have all the TC95 range. The 16x19 63ra seems a bit more powerful than the 70ra 16x19, having exactly the same specs, but 10kg/cm2 more SW. However, the comfort is amazing.

The 18x20 63ra has about the same power as the 16x19 70ra.

Imho the 18x20 63ra is the best. Power, control and comfort all in one. Amazing stick.
that is surprising but also makes sense as mass should trump the stiffness of the racket in s power equation. I mean even though we tennis players will obsess about a couple of the points of RA stiffness its nothing compared to mass in the equation.

The fact that Angel rackets have more material in them and are less hollow also makes sense why they perform with a little more power... because they just have more inherent mass behind them.. You have me considering the 18 by 20 again... Still it might just be string setup.

It is 16x19. My frame is quite a bit lighter than yours at just under 12 oz. A full bed of Lyon could work well for you. Very arm friendly but I feel it could be too soft for the 63 flex.

Interesting about lyon being perhaps too soft though i find string stiffness and frame flex are two different but complimentary sensations. I just dont like very lively strings.

Really....that's surprising. I expected the stiffer racquet to have more inherent power, despite the small difference in swingweight. I have the 16x19 70RA. One of the reasons I chose this combo was for maneuverability. Does the 63RA have a noticeably less maneuverable feel? I find that with my TC95 I can get my racquet in position for any shot and it's a knife even on defense.

and my 16x19 63RA is very very maneuverable... nearly as good as my pacific and that thing is the best ive ever tried of any racquet. I think the choice of beam taper with 19mm at the tip 20mm at throat helps them really cut through the air.
 
Last edited:
I decided to quit natural gut due weather here in miami... I have a lot of wilson nat gut 17 for sale... if any of you are interested... can do a great price!
 
Back
Top