N six-one 95 to N six-one 90 or N six-one 90 to N six-one 95

SFrazeur

Legend
I switched from the n6.1 95 18x20 to the n90, but I did use the n6.1 16x18

berfore deciding on the 18x20. So, I can comment on on three. Are there any

particular questions you have?
 

zhan

Banned
Roger_federer said:
GREAT. Finally the guy whos situation is similar to me. Lol Are you trying it for just trial or considering the switch?
i bought a n6.1 95 16x18
if the 90 feels better i'll buy a 90 lol
cuz i definately need 2 or more racquets if i play semi-competitively
 

looseswing

Professional
I switched from the 18x20 to the n90 and it played like a dream until today, but that was just me playing poorly.
 

zhan

Banned
looseswing said:
I switched from the 18x20 to the n90 and it played like a dream until today, but that was just me playing poorly.
18x20 is not a good racquet...
i tried it and i get no spin
 

SFrazeur

Legend
zhan said:
18x20 is not a good racquet...
i tried it and i get no spin
I really do not think you should say a racquet is not "good" just because it

was not right for you. The 18x20 is not going to have as much spin potential

as the 16x18. I actually think the the 18x20 is the "better" racquet of the two.

When I say better; the mean the one with a better balance between power and control.

I do admit, that the 18x20 would have been even better with a more evenly spaced pattern.
 

zhan

Banned
SFrazeur said:
I really do not think you should say a racquet is not "good" just because it

was not right for you. The 18x20 is not going to have as much spin potential

as the 16x18. I actually think the the 18x20 is the "better" racquet of the two.

When I say better; the mean the one with a better balance between power and control.

I do admit, that the 18x20 would have been even better with a more evenly spaced pattern.
i recant what i said...
but the inability to generate spin with ease is definately a negative
 
I play with the 95 16x18 now, after a year of struggling with the nc90. The 90 does feel great for serves and 1hbhs, but i got tired of losing against less skilled players with oversize frames. And believe me, it was the racquet not helping more that anything:cool: .
The 95 16x18 is a great racquet, that takes some time to adjusto it. Is more powerful but also spin oriented, so with the right technique you should control your shots, is less demanding in terms of sweetspot, and you can play within a wide range of strings tension.
I'm adding a little of lead tape in the head. Feels more solid. Time will tell.
 

NamRanger

G.O.A.T.
textbook strokes said:
I play with the 95 16x18 now, after a year of struggling with the nc90. The 90 does feel great for serves and 1hbhs, but i got tired of losing against less skilled players with oversize frames. And believe me, it was the racquet not helping more that anything:cool: .
The 95 16x18 is a great racquet, that takes some time to adjusto it. Is more powerful but also spin oriented, so with the right technique you should control your shots, is less demanding in terms of sweetspot, and you can play within a wide range of strings tension.
I'm adding a little of lead tape in the head. Feels more solid. Time will tell.


A racquet does not determine if you win or lose, it's YOU who determines who wins or loses.
 
I dont like the stock nsix one tour 90, so i really dont like the 95. I think its best to get a racquet that you can grow into and customize, then one that is limited(too stiff, too much power, not enough control, too big of a head size, so thick of a beam). I would say however, that in a blind playtest with the recommended strings, the nsix one tour 90 would feel much better.
 
Also I noticed, the n six-one 90 feels more solid than the 95. But the 95 definitely has more sweetspot. Also, the 90 looks better from far than the 95. The compact small head with a box beam...Drooooool*
 

Duzza

Legend
zhan said:
i bought a n6.1 95 16x18
if the 90 feels better i'll buy a 90 lol
cuz i definately need 2 or more racquets if i play semi-competitively
probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
 

Duzza

Legend
Yeah i was very harsh that night. Well if you're only playing semi competitive I'm sure you don't need 3 racquets just for that. And i thought i read you were only beginning tennis. If so, you will most probably hate the Tour 90.
 

zhan

Banned
Duzza said:
Yeah i was very harsh that night. Well if you're only playing semi competitive I'm sure you don't need 3 racquets just for that. And i thought i read you were only beginning tennis. If so, you will most probably hate the Tour 90.
yeah i can serve 80-90mph after only a month and a half
:rolleyes: improving pretty quickly no?
 

Duzza

Legend
That's pretty sweet. I dunno how fast I can serve maybe 110? I'm just saying from personal experience when I first started tennis racquets like the Ncode's would haven't had been on my list because of the specs.

Keep it up, how old r u?
 

zhan

Banned
Duzza said:
That's pretty sweet. I dunno how fast I can serve maybe 110? I'm just saying from personal experience when I first started tennis racquets like the Ncode's would haven't had been on my list because of the specs.

Keep it up, how old r u?
OLD...
20 now =(
:(
 
Top