Wimbledon is not an issue for me as its Nadals worse surface.I think what bothers Djokovic fans is not so much the record as the mileage that Nadal fans try to get out of the record. It's such a low n that not much should be drawn from it. In a series of three matches, luck plays a big part. If they had played 10 matches at the US Open and Nadal had won seven of them, that would be far more meaningful. No Djokovic fan disputes that Nadal's 6-1 record against him at Roland Garros is a very strong indicator of Nadal's superiority there. But when there have been only three matches and it is a 2-1 split rather than 3-0, Djokovic fans are warranted in insisting that the overall record matters far more. Put it this way: which bothers you more about Nadal's record at Wimbledon - that Djokovic leads him 2-1 in the head to head or that Djokovic leads him 4-2 in titles, 6-5 in finals, and 9-7 in semi-finals?
And how many times have Nadal and federer played at USO? Or Edberg and Becker? 3 finals is a big number. Nadal has thr bragging rights for now at USO.