Nadal and WTF

what will be Nadal's performance at WTF 2020?

  • tired

    Votes: 10 40.0%
  • injured

    Votes: 10 40.0%
  • RR

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • RR + another moral win

    Votes: 7 28.0%
  • RR simply because the orgs are unfair towards Rafa

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • SF / F

    Votes: 4 16.0%
  • win the tournament but it will remain an exho for Nadal fans

    Votes: 4 16.0%
  • win the tournament and all of a sudden the Nadal devotees will stop calling it exho

    Votes: 15 60.0%

  • Total voters
    25

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
ladies and gentlemen, Nadal usually is tired and often injured by the time of the WTF.
but in 2020 the situation is different, it's quite difficult to be tired and injured after a season that didn't happen.

so, what is your forecast if the WTF happens, only Nadal result?
 
Last edited:
And only one of those was on hardcourt.
Miracles do happen, but Nadal has never come close to winning the WTF in his prime. So his chances of doing it at the age of 34.5 this year is very poor. And that assumes the WTF will even be played, which is a big if.
 
Small chance for the Bull.
But as someone said, will there be an edition this year?
:confused:
 
Another thread for the basement dwellers to think they are funny trolling a goat-level athlete. Keep it up kids.

If you're gonna troll, at least be funny with it.
 
He will be tired
Tired of not playing enough tennis
His heart will be injured from tennis depravation
Hence, he will win
And hence, @tennis_pro will go into shock, and call it an exho
Thank you for the ability to provide multiple answers in the poll
 
EKN9FqNXUAAJCWA.jpg
 
Team events mean you had help, which is not men's singles. If so, we should add doubles gold as well.

I think DC matches are more measurable in this regard than mere doubles because they include singles and if a player wins the majority of the singles rubbers you might justifiably say he is primarily responsible for winning the title.
 
I think DC matches are more measurable in this regard than mere doubles because they include singles and if a player wins the majority of the singles rubbers you might justifiably say he is primarily responsible for winning the title.
But what if another player does his job but his teammates don't?
 
I think DC matches are more measurable in this regard than mere doubles because they include singles and if a player wins the majority of the singles rubbers you might justifiably say he is primarily responsible for winning the title.
Both Fed and Djoker have played many more DC matches than Rafa, and have very good records. Yet they each only have one while Rafa has 5.

This tells me Rafa had a very good team that could carry a big load.
 
Both Fed and Djoker have played many more DC matches than Rafa, and have very good records. Yet they each only have one while Rafa has 5.

This tells me Rafa had a very good team that could carry a big load.

Nadal never had the max number of singles wins of any of his traditional DC runs until the recent easy mug format Piquet Cup monstrosity, so the team was a great help indeed. He was able to skip a rubber when injured or recovering and still have the team take it. Insisting on counting team cups together with individual titles is nothing but typical disgustdullard hypocritical worship.
 
Never would have guessed. ;)

It's obviously not official because the ATP only includes Slams, WTFs and Masters 1000 in its category of big titles.
And it should, although I would include Olympics if it were me. Just not DC. The fact that Fed and Djoker have more DC match wins says it all.
 
Rubbish.
The Grand Slam(especially Wimbledon) are the biggest tournaments and it's in insult to group small tier events with them.

Grand Slam >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS1000/ATP500/ATP250, Olympics, Davis Cup.
 
Back
Top