And Nadal has a bigger edge at Roland Garros now than ever before........he's dropped a total of 3 sets in the last 4 years........and his most lopsided RG victory ever over Djokovic was last year 60 62 75........it was even more lopsided than 2006 RG (Nadal won 64 64 Djokovic retired).
In other eras there would be nobody better than Djokovic and Federer on clay.
Djokovic's athleticism is far superior to everyone in previous eras, and Federer's an even better claycourter than Djokovic.
Thiem would destroy the Roland Garros champions of previous eras.
Nadal is playing in by far the most difficult clay era of all-time, in terms of both physicality and skill.
Only two tennis players in the open era have won GS after 35: Rosewall and Federer.
Nadal seeks to be the third to do so but to be the first to win RG at that age, which would make him the longest-running tennis player to win the French Open in the Open era and in history since the French Internationals allowed participation. of foreign players (1925).