Shanghai Masters v Mayer
Saves set point and takes 38 seconds between points.
Umpire prompts him but does little else.
Commentator quotes 'Nadal bending rules again and getting away with it once more'
Unsportmanlike behavior.
You be the judge
Shanghai Masters v Mayer
Saves set point and takes 38 seconds between points.
Umpire prompts him but does little else.
Commentator quotes 'Nadal bending rules again and getting away with it once more'
Unsportmanlike behavior.
You be the judge
Here's an idea, why not make a separate thread and we can post there anytime a player breaks the time to serve rule. That way everybody's satisfied.
He's not the only one who does this. And don't worry. He won't be around much longer for his time wasting to bother people so badly.
Shanghai Masters v Mayer
Saves set point and takes 38 seconds between points.
Umpire prompts him but does little else.
Commentator quotes 'Nadal bending rules again and getting away with it once more'
Unsportmanlike behavior.
You be the judge
The more Nadal loses, the worse his antics will start to look.
He took exactly 55 seconds after he leveled in first set tie-breaker at 5-5. Almost 3 times as long as it's allowed.
It's actually only slightly more than 2 times. He'd have to go another 20 seconds to make it 3 times.
So according to your rules Mayer 2.0 is superior to prime Nadal?Pathetic display by Nadal for breaking the rules once more. He had to take the time because even playing his best Mayer was beating him to a pulp. But this is typical Nadal. Nadal only did well in 2010 because the whole field was playing terribly during this time of the year. Now they've caught up to him.
He shared an era with Federer. Nadal has 10 slams to Federer's 16, and was the only player on tour to successfully challenge Roger. What were the other players like Djoker and Murray doing at that time?He never had an era to begin with.
Djoker stole Rafa's mojo and infected Rafa with the problems he used to have. I think the egg chamber might be a time machine of some kind.All Im going to say is that I saw several times today where Rafa violated the time between points rule and it was clearly because he was downright exhausted from the previous point. He was breathing very heavy and you could tell he was trying to take every extra second he could to recover. It had little to nothing to do with being "routine" behavior between points.
So according to your rules Mayer 2.0 is superior to prime Nadal?![]()
Of course, of course. But if Djoker beats him before the year end it will show that Djoker 2.0 is superior. We've heard it all from your mouth over 2000 times.Nadal was never that effective against the field this late in the season. This is typical Nadal.
Exactly. I enjoy watching Djoker play too, especially this year (even though I support Rafa.)^^^
Negative people are usually projecting. I feel bad for them, obviously they have issues. It's tennis. I just like watching great players play.
It's actually only slightly more than 2 times. He'd have to go another 20 seconds to make it 3 times.
Hes going were Borg went. An early retirement. Biggest cheater I have ever seen.
Wut?Actually, go watch Nastase or Tiriac or even Jimmy Connors. You will know what real cheaters are like.
And Joker is just as big a cheater as Nadal - takes the same amount of time between serves, gets illegal coaching etc.
Wut?
![]()
HAHAHAHAHA
Wait no, that wasn't Djoker 2.0 and doesn't count, no?
Of course, of course. But if Djoker beats him before the year end it will show that Djoker 2.0 is superior. We've heard it all from your mouth over 2000 times.
You forgot to append the version number there. It should be Djoker 2.0.Djoker 2.0 is superior not because of any one win. He has thoroughly dominated Nadal all season. You ****s can't hide behind excuses of mental block or Nadal's inability to hit deep etc etc, forever. At some point, the brightest among you will acknowledge the superiority of Djoker.
Djoker 2.0 is superior not because of any one win. He has thoroughly dominated Nadal all season. You ****s can't hide behind excuses of mental block or Nadal's inability to hit deep etc etc, forever. At some point, the brightest among you will acknowledge the superiority of Djoker.
You forgot to append the version number there. It should be Djoker 2.0.
And Djoker only won USO thanks to Roger's incredible failure to convert his match points, remember that. Old man Roger almost pwned Djoker like he did in RG.
You forgot to append the version number there. It should be Djoker 2.0.
And Djoker only won USO thanks to Roger's incredible failure to convert his match points, remember that. Old man Roger almost pwned Djoker like he did in RG.
Wow, that's a weird picture - look at the eyes. freaky!