Nadal/Djokovic win % surfaces

[Pfabgon]

Many people here complain about Rafa’s distribution of slams.

63% of his slams are on clay, but 63% of Novak’s slams are on hard court.

Why aren’t there more people complaining about his slam distribution?

 

[Backspin1183]

Enough with this surface distribution sheet. Only idiots would complain about Nadal's especially after winning his 4th US Open title, one more than Djokovic has.

Also, Novak is the undisputed king down under. Not at US Open. 5 Wimbledon titles is astonishing though.

 

[Pfabgon]

Imagine if two of the slams were played on clay.

 

[DSH]

 

[Spencer Gore]

Imagine if two of the slams were played on clay.

The slam race would have been over years ago.

 

[sanak]

Many people here complain about Rafa’s distribution of slams.

63% of his slams are on clay, but 63% of Novak’s slams are on hard court.

Why aren’t there more people complaining about his slam distribution?

Because there are twice the amount of hard court slams? This is such hard math for normal people to follow.

Sent from my GM1901 using Tapatalk

 

[mahesh69a]

We have had this discussion before - the slam surfaces have not changed since before the birth of Nadal or Djokovic and 2 slams are on hard courts.
Its up to the players to alter their skill set accordingly.
We can't keep speculating - what if 2 slams were on grass? what if 2 slams were on blue clay?