Nadal/Federer head-to-head vs GS champions

[samboy01]

Rafael Nadal vs other grandslam champions (# of slams):

2-0 vs Agassi (8 )
1-0 vs Costa (1)
4-3 vs Del Potro (1)
14-7 vs Djokovic (1)
14-7 vs Federer (16)
7-2 vs Ferrero (1)
3-3 vs Gaudio (1)
6-4 vs Hewitt (2)
2-0 vs Ivanisevic (1)
2-0 vs Johansson (1)
6-2 vs Moya (1)
5-3 vs Roddick (1)
2-0 vs Safin (2)

PERFECT! No losing records against GS champions.


Roger Federer vs other grandslam champions (# of slams):

8-3 vs Agassi (8 )
0-1 vs Bruguera (2)
4-1 vs Chang (1)
3-2 vs Costa (1)
6-2 vs Del Potro (1)
9-5 vs Djokovic (1)
9-3 vs Ferrero (1)
5-0 vs Gaudio (1)
17-6 vs Hewitt (2)
2-0 vs Ivanisevic (1)
7-0 vs Johansson (1)
1-4 vs Kafelnikov (2)
2-0 vs Krajicek (1)
1-2 vs Kuerten (3)
7-0 vs Moya (1)
7-14 vs Nadal (8 )
0-3 vs Rafter (2)
19-2 vs Roddick (1)
9-2 vs Safin (2)
1-0 vs Sampras (14)

FAR FROM PERFECT! He has 5 losing head-to-head against GS champions who have won at least 2 each, including his biggest rival in his own era!

Look no matter how you twist it, Rafael Nadal is the best. All he has to do is win a couple of more slams and it's official...

 

[callmethedoctor]

I like Nadal. But you're such an idiot. Nadal never played anyone Fed had a losing h2h against. And Fed is more dominant against players they both played against.

 

[petetheileet]

Has Rafter got the best record of any player v Fed...

is anyone 4-0?

 

[samboy01]

I like Nadal. But you're such an idiot. Nadal never played anyone Fed had a losing h2h against. And Fed is more dominant against players they both played against.

That's irrelevant! The bottom line is, Nadal when you put another GS champion in front of him will win. He will show them, look ***** I'm the best. Federer, many GS champions can say "I beat him most of the time, at TENNIS!!!".

 

[Memnoch]

Thats because federer lost a lot more in his younger years then nadal did. Federer is goat because of his dominance once he got to number 1. He only lost like 5 or 6 matches a year.

 

[Bud]

Rafael Nadal vs other grandslam champions (# of slams):

2-0 vs Agassi (8 )
1-0 vs Costa (1)
4-3 vs Del Potro (1)
14-7 vs Djokovic (1)
14-7 vs Federer (16)
7-2 vs Ferrero (1)
3-3 vs Gaudio (1)
6-4 vs Hewitt (2)
2-0 vs Ivanisevic (1)
2-0 vs Johansson (1)
6-2 vs Moya (1)
5-3 vs Roddick (1)
2-0 vs Safin (2)

PERFECT! No losing records against GS champions.


Roger Federer vs other grandslam champions (# of slams):

8-3 vs Agassi (8 )
0-1 vs Bruguera (2)
4-1 vs Chang (1)
3-2 vs Costa (1)
6-2 vs Del Potro (1)
9-5 vs Djokovic (1)
9-3 vs Ferrero (1)
5-0 vs Gaudio (1)
17-6 vs Hewitt (2)
2-0 vs Ivanisevic (1)
7-0 vs Johansson (1)
1-4 vs Kafelnikov (2)
2-0 vs Krajicek (1)
1-2 vs Kuerten (3)
7-0 vs Moya (1)
7-14 vs Nadal (8 )
0-3 vs Rafter (2)
19-2 vs Roddick (1)
9-2 vs Safin (2)
1-0 vs Sampras (14)

FAR FROM PERFECT! He has 5 losing head-to-head against GS champions who have won at least 2 each, including his biggest rival in his own era!

Look no matter how you twist it, Rafael Nadal is the best. All he has to do is win a couple of more slams and it's official...

Funny that Nadal also beat Costa (FO champion from 2002) at Monte Carlo as a 16 year old in 2003.

He then went on to beat Moya at Hamburg a short time later.

Nadal defeated 2 former FO champs on clay as a 16 yo. boy

 

[samboy01]

I see Federer fans are ignoring this thread...

 

[diredesire]

I don't think a new thread is necessary every single time you have a point you want to make, especially if the general topic is the exact same as the last XX number of threads you posted. Chill out with the "New Thread" button. :???: