Nadal has beaten #1 at every slam title, except for RG 2010 (but he beat Soderling!)

[cknobman]

Lol check out your avatar. Photoshopped Nadal's arms clearly implying that he takes steroids to get arms to the size he has. I guess you've got noodle arms as well then...

LOL my avatar is kinda funny and is a gross over exaggeration of Nadal.

Kinda forgot I had that avatar its been so long since I messed with it.

 

[The_Order]

Nice try, my assertion stands.

Actually, no it doesn't.

He hasn't had to always beat #1 considering he was #1 himself when he won each of the majors. Let me point out one more time Federer failed to do this despite ample opportunities...

 

[THE FIGHTER]

Nadal is the greatest No. 2 ever.

 

[RF20Lennon]

Kudos to him! But Federer couldn't do that because he was busy being no. 1 most of the time

 

[The_Order]

Kudos to him! But Federer couldn't do that because he was busy being no. 1 most of the time

And losing to the #2...

 

[Russeljones]

Actually, no it doesn't.

He hasn't had to always beat #1 considering he was #1 himself when he won each of the majors. Let me point out one more time Federer failed to do this despite ample opportunities...

The original statement rests on the fact that Nadal has done something. I outlined the irrefutable circumstances contributing to this achievement. Your response was an attempted mitigation of these circumstances. The statistics, however, do not lie. Consecutive weeks as world #1; years ended as world #1; all departments where Nadal was, is, and will be found lacking.