AtomicForehand
Hall of Fame
The more you whine and snivel about this, the tinier your sac becomes.
Just sayin'.
Just sayin'.
How many matches has Fed retired from? How many has Nadal retired from? Google "Nadal injured" and see how many terms comes up. Every time he loses a big match there's some injury or tiredness to blame. At least Fed loses like a man most of the time, though I do think his excuses last year at Wimby were low rent. But Nadal now 4 straight majors has an excuse for a loss, and is going on 5 if he loses at Wimby. There's no comparison at all. You're fighting a losing battle BUtt.
He clearly had his leg strapped in the first match I think, which he usually doesn't have. Unless he knew he was going to lose to berdych it's obvious he had an injury just as i think nadal injured himself against del potro. But Federer didn't win that first match with the strapping and then go on to announce he may have to quit the tornament. He got on with it.
Didn't like the fact that he used the excuse later, but he WAS injured earlier in the tournament, the question is whether it was still an issue when he played Berdych or not.
The thing is Federer has not had a history of excuses. You can say he does, but compared to Nadal it's tiny. He hardly ever calls a trainer on court where as Nadal does it all the time. So when Federer does, it's looked on as more genuine cos it's not part of his routine. I mean if he does this stuff when he loses, it would be a lot more frequent because he'd do it every time.
No one is gonna change anyone's mind about the MTO. It's useless, endless circles. Rafa is in the next round, like it or not.
His groin was why he lost the 11 FO to Nadal
Federer never makes excuses for his losses
Mono, back, groin, toenails, etc.
Ok I don't know CC that well, but I've read enough of your aggressive attacking posts towards Rafa to know you hate him.
You guys all wanted Delpo to knock Rafa out so bad and are now furious that it didn't happen.
If Nadal pulls out of his QF match (which is possible) or his MRI scans reveal there is in fact an injury, will you make a thread or post apologising for your stupidity, or will you join all of the other cockroaches and head back into your hole?
No one is gonna change anyone's mind about the MTO. It's useless, endless circles. Rafa is in the next round, like it or not.
Ok I don't know CC that well, but I've read enough of your aggressive attacking posts towards Rafa to know you hate him.
You guys all wanted Delpo to knock Rafa out so bad and are now furious that it didn't happen.
If Nadal pulls out of his QF match (which is possible) or his MRI scans reveal there is in fact an injury, will you make a thread or post apologising for your stupidity, or will you join all of the other cockroaches and head back into your hole?
He strapped his leg becasue he knew he was in bad form after losing to old fart version Hewitt. He knew he would need some sort of excuse so he did that. It payed off because after getting blasted off the court by Berdych he had that excuse to make. Oh and also the luck excuse as well.
He called for the trainer when he had a set point and the trainer came out and he took a time out when it was 6-6 and Del Po was about to serve.
Again, if you read my post properly you would see that I said I have no way to know for sure if he was faking it or not. He may not have been and probably did feel something but he may be a bit of a hypochondriac as well.
Also, I said in my post that you have to look at his repeated behavior over the years especially when he is down in a match. I am sure you can come up with completely reasonable explanations for all of those MTO's when he was losing but for me it is not as easy.
If you think I am hating on Rafa and don't want Rafa to get into the finals you know absolutely zero about me. I am a Fed and Rafa fan. Yes, Fed is number one for me and Rafa is second. I am not an irrational Fed fan. I think there are times when Fed's "injuries" have seemed suspect to me. The difference between you and I is, I can admit that my favorite players are not perfect. Why is it if you are a fan of a player that player has to be infallible? Don't you think that is stupid and a little bit crazy? NO PLAYER IS PERFECT.
This place is absolutely amazing, I tell you.
Ok I don't know CC that well, but I've read enough of your aggressive attacking posts towards Rafa to know you hate him.
You guys all wanted Delpo to knock Rafa out so bad and are now furious that it didn't happen.
If Nadal pulls out of his QF match (which is possible) or his MRI scans reveal there is in fact an injury, will you make a thread or post apologising for your stupidity, or will you join all of the other cockroaches and head back into your hole?
Towser. Seriously, dude, will you lay off? You're gonna get known around the forum. People are gonna roll their eyes when they see your posts and groan, "Oh crap, it's that Towser the Micro-sac guy again."
Why do you have to make this about Federer fans hating on Rafa? Could it be that there may be some objective fans around? I know it is a horrendous thought to the fans who are too blind to see what is right in front of them and have the logic skills of hamsters.
Don't generalize about every single Federer fan and say they want Rafa to lose. There are some "normal" fans around (not many I have to admit :twisted:.)
Look man, from my side of things. I came on here expecting to talk about what a great match both played and how Delpo is really close to taking the US Open back (I hope he does since he didn't get the chance to defend it last year). I come on here and all these **** cockroaches are here taking away Nadal's credit instead of talking about the incredible match. The hate on here is ridiculous. Just look at these biscuit and towser guys. I use their own medicine on them and they are getting their panties in a bundle.
They like to attack Rafa and hate it when someone attacks Fed.
Then there's the NamRanger genius who already knows what Nadal's injury is even before the MRI scan results are released.
Why can't you give Nadal credit for fighting through the injury? He called for the trainer right after he hunched down, not at 6 all. So let's just say hypothetically, if Nadal did end up breaking Delpo and taking the set, he would've had a one set lead and then got the treatment. Would that be considered as putting Delpo off as well?
I may not even have a sac.
Is it really that hard to guess what it could have possibly been?
Nadal said he heard a crunch. It was in his left foot. The trainer strapped up his left foot where a foot fracture would occur, and applied anesthetics there and gave him pain killers. Nadal has had a history of a foot injury that both he and Toni stated before that was a career threatening injury.
I bet you didn't even know that Nadal had special shoes designed for him because of his persistent foot injury that has caused him pain since 2005. And you call yourself a Nadal fan LOL.
Look man, from my side of things. I came on here expecting to talk about what a great match both played and how Delpo is really close to taking the US Open back (I hope he does since he didn't get the chance to defend it last year). I come on here and all these **** cockroaches are here taking away Nadal's credit instead of talking about the incredible match. The hate on here is ridiculous. Just look at these biscuit and towser guys. I use their own medicine on them and they are getting their panties in a bundle.
They like to attack Rafa and hate it when someone attacks Fed.
Then there's the NamRanger genius who already knows what Nadal's injury is even before the MRI scan results are released.
Why can't you give Nadal credit for fighting through the injury? He called for the trainer right after he hunched down, not at 6 all. So let's just say hypothetically, if Nadal did end up breaking Delpo and taking the set, he would've had a one set lead and then got the treatment. Would that be considered as putting Delpo off as well?
Look man, from my side of things. I came on here expecting to talk about what a great match both played and how Delpo is really close to taking the US Open back (I hope he does since he didn't get the chance to defend it last year). I come on here and all these **** cockroaches are here taking away Nadal's credit instead of talking about the incredible match. The hate on here is ridiculous. Just look at these biscuit and towser guys. I use their own medicine on them and they are getting their panties in a bundle.
They like to attack Rafa and hate it when someone attacks Fed.
Then there's the NamRanger genius who already knows what Nadal's injury is even before the MRI scan results are released.
Why can't you give Nadal credit for fighting through the injury? He called for the trainer right after he hunched down, not at 6 all. So let's just say hypothetically, if Nadal did end up breaking Delpo and taking the set, he would've had a one set lead and then got the treatment. Would that be considered as putting Delpo off as well?
Of course I know that. But just because he has a foot injury it doesn't mean it's related to that. He heard a crunch, does that automatically mean it's a fracture? If it was, the pain wouldn't just go away for 3 hours, if anything he would've made it worse. So he fought through a foot fracture to beat Delpo. See how stupid that sounds?
Nikdom is not objective. I posted in the Fed v Nalby match thread, didn't mention Rafa at all, just made a comment on the match and he started attacking me for no reason about Rafa. When I didn't even mention him. LOL.
Is it really that hard to guess what it could have possibly been?
Nadal said he heard a crunch. It was in his left foot. The trainer strapped up his left foot where a foot fracture would occur, and applied anesthetics there and gave him pain killers. Nadal has had a history of a foot injury that both he and Toni stated before that was a career threatening injury. Nadal and the trainer were specifically talking about a very specific and uncommon injury that might have occurred. It really isn't all that hard to put 2 and 2 together.
I bet you didn't even know that Nadal had special shoes designed for him because of his persistent foot injury that has caused him pain since 2005. And you call yourself a Nadal fan LOL.
Nadal has no injury. He will be 100% healthy and will be playing against Mardy Fish, I guarantee it.
Sorry to break on you dear NAM....
But this guy (and most other NadsyPants fans) have their heads up Rafa's (you know where). So, they are unable to notice his foot injury.
If he develops piles some day, they will be the first one to announce it.
Yeah but it's always the same story, Nadal fights back through injury, what a warrior! It's like he has to be this injured guy bravely battling on all the time.
I'm not saying he never gets injured but it's all you hear about. For the record, I don't think he faked it at all. But the fact that he did win the match makes me believe he will carry on playing Wimbledon and is not anywhere near pulling out of the tournament. i think he's being melodramatic about it before even getting the results of the scan back.
Sorry but I used to be a fan of Nadal's and now I just don't care anymore. I don't root for him to lose unless he's playing someone i really like, but I don't root for him to win either.
Also I don't even really root for Federer anymore, much more on the side of Djokovic and Del Potro, so this isn't a bitter federer fan thing.
I'm beginning to feel certain that you don't.
You didn't know that he had a foot injury since 2005, give me a break. I bet you most people here on this forum don't know except a few guys like Muster and Namelessone.
Do you know what a crunch means? It means bone is snapping or cracking. That means foot fracture you dummy.
However, I know that is impossible because there's no way Nadal played through a ****ing foot fracture and beat Del Potro. He's just making up crap now to make himself look better after he CLEARLY was utilizing gamesmanship.
You didn't know that he had a foot injury since 2005, give me a break. I bet you most people here on this forum don't know except a few guys like Muster and Namelessone.
Do you know what a crunch means? It means bone is snapping or cracking. That means foot fracture you dummy.
However, I know that is impossible because there's no way Nadal played through a ****ing foot fracture and beat Del Potro. He's just making up crap now to make himself look better after he CLEARLY was utilizing gamesmanship.
I'm a guy, but your sac obsession is so scary I might have mine removed so I can be sure I won't wake up in the middle of the night to find you staring at them :shock:
Correct - Whata warrior!
But what good is a warrior when there was no battle actually.
To make it simple for you - what is he fighting against when actually hrere is no injury.
Is the trend not simple to see. He pulls an injury drams, then he sits down and whines. Once on court, he starts running around like a rabbit for next 2-3 hours from the very first point after MTO.
He is a poser. He and his uncle phony use this as a tactic to disrupt match rhythm midway.
You really don't think most fans know that, or that's why he wears shoe sizes that were much smaller than his actual size etc.? You really have some serious nerve to tell people they DON'T know something when they expressly state that they did. Why are you so angry?
Did you know Buster Keaton once broke his neck in a stunt and didn't know it for like 2 years?
And why would someone use gamesmanship after getting SET POINT, and not seeing the trainer until the GAME WAS OVER. Use your head. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. None. So Nadal's plan was to get set point. Fake an injury. Purposefully play 3 very bad points and lose the game so that he could take an injury time out. In hopes that he could psych out Del Potro, after going down 0 points to 3. You sir, are brilliant.
No need. Your sac has already shriveled away to nothing during the course of this thread. Yes, that's right. Pat between your legs all you want; it's gone. There's just a tiny pair of raisins there where the proud font of your man-juice once was.
rafa will WIN the next round but it will be with crutches.rafa will play the next round but it will be with crutches.
rafa will play the next round but it will be with crutches.
I say BS. Nadal is such a horrible sportsman, this si just plain absurd! He did not battle through an injury against Delpo, (a very conveniently timed injury, mind you), and win!!!!
i imagine when he went to the doctor it must have gone something like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsx__3rXDo8
He did tweak something, but it's been blown up to epic proprtions.
This is an example of what annoys me about Nadal
"I need be at my hundred percent. If not, gonna be impossible against him. So I have to recover."
This basically means he has an excuse if he loses to Mardy Fish which won't happen anyway. It's always like it's IMPOSSIBLE to win unless he's at 100%, which is rubbish as players often win being below 100%. I mean he just beat Del Potro with a possibly title ending injury, no?
But Nadal always puts it as if he loses, it's no failing on his part as it was totally IMPOSSIBLE to do. Like he was asked to make gold out of lead.
I don't get it. He's 25 with a whopping 10 slams, has won 19(?) masters, has all 4 slams and is still winning them, he's already one of the all time great (whatever Nadal haters may say he will be one of the legends, maybe the best of all time if he can get 16 or 17 slams) he should be able to give up some defeats and feel ok with being outplayed sometimes. It's not going to hurt his legend. He used to be a humble guy who admitted his shortcomings, but since overthrowing Federer he's gotten more sensitive to appearing beatable sometimes. It's like there has to be some extenuating circumstances surrounding each defeat, when he's good enough that it's not needed.
Look maybe he does get injured all the time, but if I was him I would be getting embarassed and downplaying it. He said himself he didn't want to be seen as a player always using injuries as an excuse. So Why not wait until tuesday and the scan is done and the situation is known? But he straight away starts talking about the possibility of him having to retire - going with the worse case scenario before the facts are in. Man, keep it under your hat until you know, he's not doing his reputation any good. I know Nadal fans get angry about this but he makes it worse, he really does.
Ive been a big Djokovic fan and even I used to get annoyed with his retirements. Not cos I thought he was faking but he seemed to give up too easily and was making a bad reputation for himself. The same with some of Federer's candid comments. I don't know why Nadal fans can't get why people are getting tired of this and why he can't downplay things a bit more. Aren't there any Nadal fans who get embarrassed by this?
He did tweak something, but it's been blown up to epic proprtions.
This is an example of what annoys me about Nadal
"I need be at my hundred percent. If not, gonna be impossible against him. So I have to recover."
This basically means he has an excuse if he loses to Mardy Fish which won't happen anyway. It's always like it's IMPOSSIBLE to win unless he's at 100%, which is rubbish as players often win being below 100%. I mean he just beat Del Potro with a possibly title ending injury, no?
But Nadal always puts it as if he loses, it's no failing on his part as it was totally IMPOSSIBLE to do. Like he was asked to make gold out of lead.
I don't get it. He's 25 with a whopping 10 slams, has won 19(?) masters, has all 4 slams and is still winning them, he's already one of the all time great (whatever Nadal haters may say he will be one of the legends, maybe the best of all time if he can get 16 or 17 slams) he should be able to give up some defeats and feel ok with being outplayed sometimes. It's not going to hurt his legend. He used to be a humble guy who admitted his shortcomings, but since overthrowing Federer he's gotten more sensitive to appearing beatable sometimes. It's like there has to be some extenuating circumstances surrounding each defeat, when he's good enough that it's not needed.
Look maybe he does get injured all the time, but if I was him I would be getting embarassed and downplaying it. He said himself he didn't want to be seen as a player always using injuries as an excuse. So Why not wait until tuesday and the scan is done and the situation is known? But he straight away starts talking about the possibility of him having to retire - going with the worse case scenario before the facts are in. Man, keep it under your hat until you know, he's not doing his reputation any good. I know Nadal fans get angry about this but he makes it worse, he really does.
Ive been a big Djokovic fan and even I used to get annoyed with his retirements. Not cos I thought he was faking but he seemed to give up too easily and was making a bad reputation for himself. The same with some of Federer's candid comments. I don't know why Nadal fans can't get why people are getting tired of this and why he can't downplay things a bit more. Aren't there any Nadal fans who get embarrassed by this?