SlayThat he was 2nd in the decade dominated by Federer and also 2nd in the decade dominated by Djokovic.
Therefore, he was their greatest rival.
That he was 2nd in the decade dominated by Federer and also 2nd in the decade dominated by Djokovic.
Therefore, he was their greatest rival.
Nadal was the first in the decade dominated by Nadal (2006-2015). Nadal won 13 Slams in 2006-2015, more than any other male tennis player in that decade.Slay
Of course anything is possible to fit ones agenda lol.Nadal was the first in the decade dominated by Nadal (2006-2015).
P. S.: a decade is any period of ten years.
That he was 2nd in the decade dominated by Federer and also 2nd in the decade dominated by Djokovic.
Therefore, he was their greatest rival.
Nadal was the first in the decade dominated by Nadal (2006-2015).
P. S.: a decade is any period of ten years.
Obviously, @Nole Slam writes about calendar decades, ie the 2000s (2000-2009) and 2010s (2010-2019) decades.Nadal was the first in the decade dominated by Nadal (2006-2015).
P. S.: a decade is any period of ten years.
More than 50 matches played:
Djokovic - Nadal
Djokovic - Federer
And Djokovic leads both H2H.
Not beating Djokovic and being past their primes are two different things.Only overtaking both in the H2H once they were past their primes.
Just like he should do....
Then this would make Djokovic the greatest rival hmmMore than 50 matches played:
Djokovic - Nadal
Djokovic - Federer
And Djokovic leads both H2H.
And since 2015? 7-1 for Gramps, sorry to tell you, mate. (and yes, it is 7-1, not 6-2 like you claimed last year).Though I don’t know if you can call 10-4 (hidden 15-4) in Slams a rivalry. More like Nadal schooled Federer and he had no place to hide.
It tells longevity of Rafa is second to Roger
Nadal is simply the greatest.
It’s 6-1 and not 8-1 like you wish it was. 1 win in 2015, 4 in 17 and 1 in 19.And since 2015? 7-1 for Gramps, sorry to tell you, mate. (and yes, it is 7-1, not 6-2 like you claimed last year).
How did Nadal actually dominate 2014 and 2015?
It’s 6-1 and not 8-1 like you wish it was. 1 win in 2015, 4 in 17 and 1 in 19.
Let’s count together, it’s really simple:
1 (one, uno) + 4 (four, cuatro) + 1 (one, uno) = ?
But Djokovic costs Federer more than Nadal costs him. Think of all those Wimbledon crowns, and all those match points!
And Djokovic costs Nadal more than Federer. Think of the 7 straight finals losses!
Nadal is the greatest rival of BOTH of his contemporaries.
So,
I ask you,
What does this tell us?
He is #2Nadal is the greatest rival of BOTH of his contemporaries.
So,
I ask you,
What does this tell us?
Devastating soul shatteringBut Djokovic costs Federer more than Nadal costs him. Think of all those Wimbledon crowns, and all those match points!
And Djokovic costs Nadal more than Federer. Think of the 7 straight finals losses!
Nadal has owned Djokovic their whole career. 20-18. Federer era. Then Nadal era. Slay.That he was 2nd in the decade dominated by Federer and also 2nd in the decade dominated by Djokovic.
Therefore, he was their greatest rival.
Djokovic is the third wheel. Slay.Nadal is the greatest rival of BOTH of his contemporaries.
So,
I ask you,
What does this tell us?
20>18Nadal has owned Djokovic their whole career. 20-18. Federer era. Then Nadal era. Slay.
What does hidden mean here?Though I don’t know if you can call 10-4 (hidden 15-4) in Slams a rivalry. More like Nadal schooled Federer and he had no place to hide.
US Open AvoidererWhat does hidden mean here?
Ah... well, can't the same case be made for Nadal not reaching Federer at slams? What counts as avoiding?US Open Avoiderer
Only overtaking both in the H2H once they were past their primes.
Just like he should do....
You mean younger.He is ONE year older than Nadal. ONE.
You mean younger.
That he is a clay court specialist in an age when no one else is so he gets to vulture clay tournaments at a high rate? Just guessing this is what you meantNadal is the greatest rival of BOTH of his contemporaries.
So,
I ask you,
What does this tell us?
Then it should be 2001-2010 and 2011-2020; there was no year 0.Obviously, @Nole Slam writes about calendar decades, ie the 2000s (2000-2009) and 2010s (2010-2019) decades.