I've just come across yet another article that says that Nadal was the youngest to complete the career Grand Slam. Don't these writers do any research? Why do they keep publishing this mis-information?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/7103128.cms
(For the record, Don Budge was the youngest, 2 days before his 23rd Birthday, when he won the French Open in June of 1938). In fact Nadal isn't even the 2nd Youngest - Laver was younger than Nadal by about two months when he completed his career Slam in September of 1962).
I guess if you say a thing so many times, it becomes the truth right?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/7103128.cms
(For the record, Don Budge was the youngest, 2 days before his 23rd Birthday, when he won the French Open in June of 1938). In fact Nadal isn't even the 2nd Youngest - Laver was younger than Nadal by about two months when he completed his career Slam in September of 1962).
I guess if you say a thing so many times, it becomes the truth right?