Nadal is a leading expert, full stop.He's also the leading expert on being strange......
Got to applaud Nadal's honesty here. I bet a lot people thought it was strange but didn't say a word. Where's Fed in all of this? He may not be an expert on being injured but surely knows a thing or two about better PR.
Did the ask him in the presser and he refused to answer? Most times people scream scandal on this forum because of what a player said, is based on an answer (to a question) they have to come up with in 2 seconds! Give me and them a break
Nadal is the one of the worlds leading expert on being injured and thus, the protocol for when to withdraw from a tournament due to injury
If he says it's strange, then it's strange
In this particular case, I believe that certain physical developments led Murray to the simple conclusion that he wouldn't be fit enough to win the tournament which was his sole reason for entering. The timing of it was indeed unfortunate but nothing more than that.
It's difficult to believe that Andy didn't know Friday he wasn't fit enough to win the tournament. Hell, I think he knew before flying to New York that he wasn't fit enough to win the tournament, and likely not fit enough to even play.
I have two theories about this.
1) Murray wants to win the best US Open final(2012) award
in the decade of 2011-2020. If Roger and Rafa make the final and play a breathtaking one, his award is gone.
2) He simply want to screw the US Open organizers. Two of the biggest stars in one section of the draw. And the other section has who Zverev. Organizers would have e tough time scheduling the matches. Also it ensures Roger and Rafa Dont get night matches consecutive ly.
Ok. One more, the most logical one
One of Roger and Rafa could get maximum 720 points, the semi points. If they were opposite sides of the a draw, the final pointsv are 1200 which both can possibly get, one 2000 one 1200. 480 ranking points is big in ATP which makes a difference maybe in next year when Murray gains points
Murray wanted Fedal to tire themselves playing each other out just in case he played and somehow push his way to the finals
How about a 4th option: On Saturday morning Murray felt something give in his hip that he hadn't quite felt in the days he had been practicing up to that time and knew for certain from that point that he wouldn't be able to play 7 best of 5 matches in the next 2 weeks so he withdrew. Or is that far too fantastic and outlandish to consider compared to your other much more 'realistic' options?
Hmmm...the big flaw in that theory is that Murray withdrew and I don't think they let you back in once you have done that. Otherwise, good point!
Chill Mainad, i guess everyone is having a bit fun here. Started by the comments of Mr. Rafael Nadal
Are you sure? Now that Zverev and Tsonga are both gone I think Andy is totally justified in applying for the rarely used Reinstatement Into a Grandslam Greatly Eviscerated Draw (RIGGED). I think he'll get it! Just slot him in Tsonga's spot and disqualify Shapovalov for that umpire thing he once did.
Your last theory is the most likely one. As I said earlier, Murray is now irrelevant as far as draws go unless he comes back before the end of the season and defends all his points.I have two theories about this.
1) Murray wants to win the best US Open final(2012) award
in the decade of 2011-2020. If Roger and Rafa make the final and play a breathtaking one, his award is gone.
2) He simply want to screw the US Open organizers. Two of the biggest stars in one section of the draw. And the other section has who Zverev. Organizers would have e tough time scheduling the matches. Also it ensures Roger and Rafa Dont get night matches consecutive ly.
Ok. One more, the most logical one
One of Roger and Rafa could get maximum 720 points, the semi points. If they were opposite sides of the a draw, the final pointsv are 1200 which both can possibly get, one 2000 one 1200. 480 ranking points is big in ATP which makes a difference maybe in next year when Murray gains points
In a way you can understand his frustration. Even if he'd lost in the final, he would've become only the third player in the Open Era after Federer and Djokovic to reach at least 4 finals at all 4 majors. Now he'll probably have to wait another year, unless a miracle occurs and someone does his dirty work by taking Federer out of the equation beforehand.I love Nadal's optimism. He so woulda made it to the final, but now he's gotta lose in the semi to Fed.
Murray woulda gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for Nadal recognizing douchemove-271 from his playbook.
See? The obsessive and maniac Nadal fan that replied everyone on the thread conveniently missed this to answer.LOL,how about nadal withdraw from 2009 Wimby after the draw?
Not strange?![]()
No. Rafa did not say no one should withdraw after the draw. Rafa must have retired couple of days after whilst still trying his best to see if he could play but Murray retired on the morning after the draw so it appears that he had no intentions of playing in the first place.
See? The obsessive and maniac Nadal fan that replied everyone on the thread conveniently missed this to answer.
Well, Fed can take a lead and tweet about it or post on FB. He/his team knows how to use social media? It's definitely strange he is silent about a strange behavior from a top pro.