Nadal needed to play 56 slams to get #18, Federer 69 slams

#57
Nadal 9-6 Djokovic over 5 sets.....do you know what pigeon even means lol.

Masters 1000 Nadal also leads Djokovic...did you miss Rome? It was a play off. Nadal better at USOpen even...Djokovic best surface. I could go on lol.
Nadal also benefited from a weaker draw and unfair scheduling in Rome. Nadal had an easy match Saturday afternoon, Novak had a tough match that started at 8PM. Novak has many more weeks at #1, 5 YE titles Rafa has-0, Novak has 1 more YE at #1, has 4 Wimbledon titles, Nadal has 2, Novak has 7 AO, Nadal has 1. All things considered IMO, Nadal and Novak are even in the ATG Race, so far.
 
#59
Nadal also benefited from a weaker draw and unfair scheduling in Rome. Nadal had an easy match Saturday afternoon, Novak had a tough match that started at 8PM. Novak has many more weeks at #1, 5 YE titles Rafa has-0, Novak has 1 more YE at #1, has 4 Wimbledon titles, Nadal has 2, Novak has 7 AO, Nadal has 1. All things considered IMO, Nadal and Novak are even in the ATG Race, so far.
Its very close granted. Had Djokovic won FO he would have overtaken Rafa. That's why that defeat to Thiem (and I think to rafa in Rome although you are right about the scheduling) will be stinging now
 
#62
18-15, 34-3382-74,


Looks like you missed the bagel and the breadstick Novak ate in Rome :-D:-D

18GS-15GS, sorry pal, Novak is the bad of the Big 3 :laughing:
HAHAH thanks you reminded me ned also been bagelled on all surfaces by his other rival federer. How can you be king of clay and get bagelled on clay!!

Ned GOAT when he has a losing h2h vs his main rival!!! hahahaha

and to top it off 7-0 7-0 was on hard court slams, grass slams and clay slams!! hahah owned by your main rival and your GOAT hahah

nedel GOAT hahahaha

0 wins at AO, A SLAM vs his main rival
0 wins at multiple masters vs his main rival
losing h2h vs his main rival
went 7-0 vs his main rival
went 7-0 vs his main rival ONCE AGAIN HAHAHA and didnt win a set in 7 thrashings
 
#63
HAHAH thanks you reminded me ned also been bagelled on all surfaces by his other rival federer. How can you be king of clay and get bagelled on clay!!

Ned GOAT when he has a losing h2h vs his main rival!!! hahahaha

and to top it off 7-0 7-0 was on hard court slams, grass slams and clay slams!! hahah owned by your main rival and your GOAT hahah

nedel GOAT hahahaha

0 wins at AO, A SLAM vs his main rival
0 wins at multiple masters vs his main rival
losing h2h vs his main rival
went 7-0 vs his main rival
went 7-0 vs his main rival ONCE AGAIN HAHAHA and didnt win a set in 7 thrashings

Only 15 GS, sorry pal, Djokovic is very bad compared with the BIG 2.
 
#64
Only 15 GS, sorry pal, Djokovic is very bad compared with the BIG 2.
But Ned only has 18 to feds 20 :-D:-D:-D:-D

Big 2? Lol Ned will retire without a single record in:

GS total (Fed), WTF (Fed/Djok), masters, YE no 1, weeks no 1, best h2h (Djok), best olympic record (Murray).... Ned isn't even in the discussion

Djokovic superior in every single one

Ned has never beaten his main rival at AO, multiple masters and has a losing h2h against his main rival..... GOAT lol he isn't even in big 5 contention :-D:-D:-D:-D:-D
 
Last edited:
#65
Nadal leads the Masters 1000 table google it lol.

Djokovic had his chance to be GOAT at FO...and missed the chance. Nadal bagged it as he always does when the pressure is on. That is the reality.
Handles the pressure? Hahaha Like bottling 7-0 7-0 and the latest slam meeting between the two :-D:-D:-D

No unlike Djokovic has done in all his non weak era slams, Ned merely faced a complete mug in the final as per usual... 0 slam, 0 masters, 0 wtf, 0 weeks at no 1 finalisit again for weak era king Ned, anderson, berdych, ferrer, peurta, Thiem and Theim again :-D:-D:-D

And sorry pal, no Nadal loses in the h2h vs his main rival, end of story
 
#68
Borg won 11 out of 21 slams starting from his first. Fed won I believe 16 of 27. Within that, in their primes, 15 of 25 and 8 of 14. Absolutely incredible to maintain the peak/prime level consecutively for as long as those guys did with the versatility to boot. It's why I have them top 2 in the open era.
 
#69
Borg only played Australian Open once (1974). As it was played on grass and he won five straight Wimbledon it is very likely he would have won many if he had played. That is why Borg's slam record is in fact deflated because he only played three slams a year.
He also skipped RG in the middle of his prime because of WTT.
 
Top