6-1 is bigger pigeonhood lol.7-0 7-0 is pigeonhood
6-1 is bigger pigeonhood lol.7-0 7-0 is pigeonhood
6-1 is bigger pigeonhood lol.
Nadal 9-5 Djokovic...…..Nothing is bigger pigeonhood then going 7-0 7-0 consecutively, HARD, CLAY, GRASS, INDOORS complete domination.
7-0 in matches without nadal even winning a single set (yes not a typo nadal pigeon didnt even win a set vs novak in 7 consecitive beat downs)
Dude, forgive me, you seem a trifle upset?Nothing is bigger pigeonhood then going 7-0 7-0 consecutively, HARD, CLAY, GRASS, INDOORS complete domination.
7-0 in matches without nadal even winning a single set (yes not a typo nadal pigeon didnt even win a set vs novak in 7 consecitive beat downs)
Nadal 9-5 Djokovic...…..
Dude, did you miss Rome a few weeks ago...it is a Masters event. Guess who won.0 wins at AO, A SLAM vs his main rival
0 wins at multiple masters vs his main rival
losing h2h vs his main rival
nedel GOAT hahahaha
Nadal also benefited from a weaker draw and unfair scheduling in Rome. Nadal had an easy match Saturday afternoon, Novak had a tough match that started at 8PM. Novak has many more weeks at #1, 5 YE titles Rafa has-0, Novak has 1 more YE at #1, has 4 Wimbledon titles, Nadal has 2, Novak has 7 AO, Nadal has 1. All things considered IMO, Nadal and Novak are even in the ATG Race, so far.Nadal 9-6 Djokovic over 5 sets.....do you know what pigeon even means lol.
Masters 1000 Nadal also leads Djokovic...did you miss Rome? It was a play off. Nadal better at USOpen even...Djokovic best surface. I could go on lol.
Its very close granted. Had Djokovic won FO he would have overtaken Rafa. That's why that defeat to Thiem (and I think to rafa in Rome although you are right about the scheduling) will be stinging nowNadal also benefited from a weaker draw and unfair scheduling in Rome. Nadal had an easy match Saturday afternoon, Novak had a tough match that started at 8PM. Novak has many more weeks at #1, 5 YE titles Rafa has-0, Novak has 1 more YE at #1, has 4 Wimbledon titles, Nadal has 2, Novak has 7 AO, Nadal has 1. All things considered IMO, Nadal and Novak are even in the ATG Race, so far.
Nadal 9-5 Djokovic...…..
nadal is a long long way behind djokovic
0 wins at AO, A SLAM vs his main rival
0 wins at multiple masters vs his main rival
losing h2h vs his main rival
nedel GOAT hahahaha
18-15, 34-3382-74,
Looks like you missed the bagel and the breadstick Novak ate in Rome
18GS-15GS, sorry pal, Novak is the bad of the Big 3
HAHAH thanks you reminded me ned also been bagelled on all surfaces by his other rival federer. How can you be king of clay and get bagelled on clay!!
Ned GOAT when he has a losing h2h vs his main rival!!! hahahaha
and to top it off 7-0 7-0 was on hard court slams, grass slams and clay slams!! hahah owned by your main rival and your GOAT hahah
nedel GOAT hahahaha
0 wins at AO, A SLAM vs his main rival
0 wins at multiple masters vs his main rival
losing h2h vs his main rival
went 7-0 vs his main rival
went 7-0 vs his main rival ONCE AGAIN HAHAHA and didnt win a set in 7 thrashings
Only 15 GS, sorry pal, Djokovic is very bad compared with the BIG 2.
Nadal leads the Masters 1000 table google it lol.
Djokovic had his chance to be GOAT at FO...and missed the chance. Nadal bagged it as he always does when the pressure is on. That is the reality.
Borg only played Australian Open once (1974). As it was played on grass and he won five straight Wimbledon it is very likely he would have won many if he had played. That is why Borg's slam record is in fact deflated because he only played three slams a year.Borg has 18 GS?
Nadal had 11 GS almost 10 years ago
Nadal the superior player.
Anyway, the H2H of 24-15 left that clear time ago.
He also skipped RG in the middle of his prime because of WTT.Borg only played Australian Open once (1974). As it was played on grass and he won five straight Wimbledon it is very likely he would have won many if he had played. That is why Borg's slam record is in fact deflated because he only played three slams a year.