Congrats to those nominated.
I don't personally know any of the players so I can't judge one way or the other if they're "deserving" or not. Nor do I think it indicates that Nadal or Djokovic or Murray or any of the other hundreds of players NOT nominated are not worthy individuals just because they missed out on an award.
I see that Nadal is humble in his press conferences and interviews. I've seen behind the scenes (so to speak) videos that show him to be a very nice guy. I love him as a player. I like what I know of him as a person. I just don't feel like some high moral wrong has been done for him not being nominated.
This is the description of the award according to the website linked above:
The player who, throughout the year, conducted himself at the highest level of professionalism and integrity, who competed with his fellow players with the utmost spirit of fairness and who promoted the game through his off-court activities.
Personally I think the common thread here is OLDER guys. They're 26 years old or older. This award is not just about what you do on the field, but also what you've done for the game outside of the field. It's not about press conferences and how you treat other players. Roger Federer, if you like him or not, has personally made people want to play tennis around the world. People like him and Moya have given a lot to the sport throughout the years.
Nadal will join them through the years, but he is young. Every little thing doesn't have to be taken as a slight to Nadal. No institution or organization is perfect. Yes, commentators, players, and a lot of fans might find Federer's game very aesthetically pleasing and might be biased towards him. But come on, gals and guys, he was number one for four years. He was number one for most of last year as well. He does a LOT of work for the ATP. He is the head of the ATP players.
I (just me and my opinion) do not think it is fair to demean an award just because one's favorite is not nominated. If he's nominated a few years from now, will it have righted itself? That's just silly. Winning a lot of matches and being number one and being
nice isn't the criteria here. Look at the others nominated. I don't know about Ljubicic and Nieminen, but I know both Moya and Federer have done a lot for the sport. Nor do I see their on court behavior in anyways being anything but ideal.
Not that what I say will dissauade those that feel sighted or those that feel justified in one way or other, but hey I have the ability and the opportunity to express my opinion, so why not?