Nadal: Olympics bigger than Grand Slams

Darn, did I say something stupid again ?

Confused-Nadal.jpg
 
Tennis is a minor sport at the Olympics. If the OG > Slams, then that's a shame for tennis.

That said :

2hg9xjs.jpg
 
If Rafa didn't own Federer H2H, the haters would have never slithered out of their holes :)

It's amusing :lol:


And what hole have you been hiding in ever since Nadal starting losing to Djokovic? You shouldn't talk about what's amusing. :oops:
 
My Dear Friends,

For your cogitation

Olympics>Major
750>2000
10>16
Clay>Hardcourt
Red>Blue
Kia>Mercedes
Mustard>Ketchup
Knees=Hurt

Lol this was awesome. What a complete jackass, he's becoming. Unreal of a statement. So after years of basically no one worth mentioning caring about the event, he feels since he's won it he can elevate it to that stature? This guy should shut this trap of his when he can, before he's labeled a complete wacko. He's well on his way, just needs another beatdown spanning an entire year to do the trick.
 
Nadal must be a patriot, like Hewitt. Hewitt said, after beating Federer in the 2003 DC SF, that winning that match was way better and more important than winning Wimbledon.

Nadal is very patriotic indeed but I think him putting OG above slams has to do more with the Olympic atmosphere than the actual tennis event there(which has little history).

I remember that in 2008, before he even made finals in the Olympics, he was writing about the atmosphere in the Olympic village, how awesome it was to meet so many incredible athletes from so many sport and so on. He really seemed to get a kick out of it, he sounded more like a sports fan than a guy competing in a olympic event. :)
 
Hmmm so Ralph's shamelessly tooting his own horn. I bet he doesn't believe his own BS. But apparently the media and his army of *******s do. Well, what's new?
 
'In an interview with Reuters, the 25-year-old said that for him personally the Olympics ranked above the four Grand Slams in prestige.'

Of course, he's the only active player to have won a singles gold medal in the Olympics so he might just be a little biased! :wink:

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/04052012/58/nadal-olympics-bigger-grand-slams.html

This is hilarious. Clearly a dig at Federer and his own position among the greats.
How many tournaments does Rafa have to win before he becomes secure in himself?
 
Can't see the reason for all this butthurt honestly, Nadal's stating his personal preference, heck Novak would probably still say the greatest moment in his career was winning DC despite the fact that he reached #1 and became a Wimbledon champion all in the span of few days last year, I remember Fed crying after losing a Basel final to Henman etc.

The opinion on the value/importance of the Olympics medal vastly differs from player to player.
 
I have listened to this several times and I cannot hear­ Nadal saying that the olympics are bigger than the­ slams. He says that the olympic games are very special­ for many reasons, the biggest one being that you are­ representing your country.
 
I have listened to this several times and I cannot hear­ Nadal saying that the olympics are bigger than the­ slams. He says that the olympic games are very special­ for many reasons, the biggest one being that you are­ representing your country.
Media pumps out typical sensationalist headline; *******s believe sensationalist headline word for word without actually reading/watching the article/video; proclaim that *******s believe Rafa's BS, when they themselves believe sensationalist BS word for word; conveniently decide to forget the part where he states he is about to express his opinion; lambast him anyway as though he is preaching truth; what else is new?

Meanwhile, I'm sure Federer, the PC man, would've have said something along the lines of:

"Well you know, slams are important, maybe the most important events in the season, but the Olympics are also very special, especially since they only come by every four years, so they're all important."
 
Media pumps out typical sensationalist headline; *******s believe sensationalist headline word for word without actually reading/watching the article/video; proclaim that *******s believe Rafa's BS, when they themselves believe sensationalist BS word for word; conveniently decide to forget the part where he states he is about to express his opinion; lambast him anyway as though he is preaching truth; what else is new?

Meanwhile, I'm sure Federer, the PC man, would've have said something along the lines of:

"Well you know, slams are important, maybe the most important events in the season, but the Olympics are also very special, especially since they only come by every four years, so they're all important."

LOL spot on, Federer the most meaningless personality in tennis.
 
Nadal is truly pathetic... nothing more to say about that guy!

cant wait for the day he retires
 
You respect an opinion because it is a reasonable one and that doesnt mean you have to agree with it.
 
You respect an opinion because it is a reasonable one and that doesnt mean you have to agree with it.

you should note that your own argument dismantles Nadal's idea. it is nothing close to reasonable. therefore one cannot respect that.

using a analogy to ilustrate :

I dislike Queen, but i respect those who like. why? because i can recognize the merits in that refered band.

I dislike Jessie J and i disrespect those who like why? her music is absolute fecal matter!!!
 
you should note that your own argument dismantles Nadal's idea. it is nothing close to reasonable. therefore one cannot respect that.

using a analogy to ilustrate :

I dislike Queen, but i respect those who like. why? because i can recognize the merits in that refered band.

I dislike Jessie J and i disrespect those who like why? her music is absolute fecal matter!!!

Least we can agree on those musical matters. Queen are the worst band in the history of popular music. Turned Rock n roll into pantomime. The less said about alien head Jessie J the better!
 
So Nadal is in the Marc Rosset level of contention for GOAT status.... I agree
 
Media pumps out typical sensationalist headline; *******s believe sensationalist headline word for word without actually reading/watching the article/video; proclaim that *******s believe Rafa's BS, when they themselves believe sensationalist BS word for word; conveniently decide to forget the part where he states he is about to express his opinion; lambast him anyway as though he is preaching truth; what else is new?

Meanwhile, I'm sure Federer, the PC man, would've have said something along the lines of:

"Well you know, slams are important, maybe the most important events in the season, but the Olympics are also very special, especially since they only come by every four years, so they're all important."
Great post,dude. However, double standard is the standard when it comes to talking about Nadal on this forum
 
Can't see the reason for all this butthurt honestly, Nadal's stating his personal preference, heck Novak would probably still say the greatest moment in his career was winning DC despite the fact that he reached #1 and became a Wimbledon champion all in the span of few days last year, I remember Fed crying after losing a Basel final to Henman etc.

The opinion on the value/importance of the Olympics medal vastly differs from player to player.

Yes, sir. Novak was crying as he exited the court after losing to Nadal at Bejing SFs. Yet, Nadal is the worst person on earth for thinking that Olympics were special
 
Yes, sir. Novak was crying as he exited the court after losing to Nadal at Bejing SFs. Yet, Nadal is the worst person on earth for thinking that Olympics were special


that is not what he said.
 
that is not what he said.

It's a hyperbole.

No one criticizes Djokovic, Hewitt, Ljubicic etc. for thinking national competitions are of great importance. When Nadal said it, it is unacceptable. He is clearly tooting his own horn since he has won an Olympic gold. Apparently, It is not ok that Nadal has an opinion
 
Last edited:
Rafa is right. Four chances a year to win a slam. One shot every four years to win OLY gold. Totally true statement by Rafa.
 
It's a hyperbole.

No one criticizes Djokovic, Hewitt, Ljubicic etc. for thinking national competitions are of great importance. When Nadal said it, it is unacceptable. He is clearly tooting his own horn since he has won an Olympic gold. Apparently, It is not ok that Nadal has an opinion

either you didnt read the article or you have understanding problems.

Nadal did not say OG is important. he said it's the most important. big difference there hey sparky?
 
This is a sensationalist title aimed at stirring things up (usual aim of the media, right?) What Rafa explains in the interview is not that the olympics is more important than the slams but that there is more prestige at winning an event for your country instead of just for yourself, a statement which is much less controversial than the journalist's headline suggests.
In another interview, asked what Rafa would most like to win in the future, he answered "slams", so I doubt very much he either underestimates or despises slams (I think the 6 hour battle vs Djoko at AO speaks for itself in this matter actually).
well said. unfortunately most people here can't see the difference between their livelihood and the nation's livelihood. that is why a certain country always has problems getting NBA players to play in the olympics for example. it is always ME ME ME attitude. the same logic applies to why certain countries cant get its act together, and see how far they have fallen behind the rest of the world. because that doesnt matter at all. its all about their own individual livelihoods.
 
either you didnt read the article or you have understanding problems.

Nadal did not say OG is important. he said it's the most important. big difference there hey sparky?

I think it is you who is having comprehension issues. Nadal used the key word " in my opinion". So what?That is only his personal view. It is a subjective feeling of his, get it slugger?

Olympics mean more to some players than others.
 
either you didnt read the article or you have understanding problems.

Nadal did not say OG is important. he said it's the most important. big difference there hey sparky?
read the piece in context pls, if your limited cerebral cortex allows for that. he said it is the most important because it is about bringing glory to his nation. and why is that important? because national glory trumps individual glory to him. do you understand that?
 
This statement is becoming a cliche. He was a great singer, but the best in Rock n Roll history? LOL!

Maybe If the only Rock n Roll band you listen to is Queen, then yeah

Who's a better singer, then? MICK JAGGER? Lolz. Nobody has/had as much variety as Bulsara.
 
read the piece in context pls, if your limited cerebral cortex allows for that. he said it is the most important because it is about bringing glory to his nation. and why is that important? because national glory trumps individual glory to him. do you understand that?

Welcome back VOLLEY DUMBO.

hope you get banned soon.

now if your peanut could work as a brain, you would know IN TENNIS (not in your Rafa wet dream) the greatest prizes are the 4 Slams.
 
I think it is you who is having comprehension issues. Nadal used the key word " in my opinion". So what?That is only his personal view. It is a subjective feeling of his, get it slugger?

Olympics mean more to some players than others.

IN TENNIS (you know... the sport we are debating here) it is unquestionable that the greatest achievements are related to slams (FO; AO; USO; SW19). so anything not envolving those 4 tournaments as the benchmark of greatness is self-inflation delusional grandeur.

i could care a "analisys king's" arse for how Nadal feels. i feel is his coming out like a pompous idiot! how do you feel about that?

got it junior?
 
Back
Top