Conquistador
Banned
This could be the toughest poll question in talk tennis history in my opinion. Both of these guys seem surreal to be perched number 1 and 2 in the world. The question is who is the better role model for tennis fans?
This could be the toughest poll question in talk tennis history in my opinion. Both of these guys seem surreal to be perched number 1 and 2 in the world. The question is who is the better role model for tennis fans?
Its hard to choose. On the one hand you have nadal with his energy, determination, and humility.
On the other hand you have fed who is gracious in defeat, modest, loves fashion and never courts press attention. They are both great role models imo.
LOL those guys got pwned.Its hard to choose. On the one hand you have nadal with his gamesmanship, bellicose behavior toward his colleagues, and totally inimitable style that depends on some genetic mutation (artificial or otherwise).
On the other hand you have fed who is worldly, kind and generous to his colleages (after all, they love him so much... even his biggest rival can't shut up about him), and so passionate about the game that he lets his fans see his true emotions. They are both great role models imo.
LOL those guys got pwned.
I do say so. You brought up some lame points about Fed and JeMar brought up his own stupid points about Nadal. mmm Yeah its all even.Lol if you say so
I do say so. You brought up some lame points about Fed and JeMar brought up his own stupid points about Nadal. mmm Yeah its all even.
Absolutely. Come back for more pwnage.Ok sir
Well whatever pwned means to you, enjoy it. Thanks for the commentary
They are obviously good guys but I voted for Nadal. He exudes that "people's champion" character....just one of the guys you can have beer with.
“Roger in the locker room is I think pretty unique in terms of players of his stature. I have several friends who are still playing on tour full time. They talk about Roger minutes before he’s playing a grand slam semi final. They’ll still be there playing doubles, and he’ll be listening to their ipods and asking them what their favorite new songs are. And this is literally minutes before he’s going out to play a prime time semi final grand slam match. . .Roger just has this very light energy around him. He’s not a tortured artist by any means. He’s someone who loves being around the courts. Loves hanging around tennis, loves talking tennis, loves being in this world. And it’s this very special lightness of being that I think the other players marvel at because he doesn’t show any mercy when he plays. But he knows how to make people feel comfortable around him. And for many, many years there were champions whose M.O. was to make everybody else uncomfortable. So it’s a very different energy that he brings to the table.“
Read more: http://www.gototennisblog.com/2009/...e-tremendous-nadal-federer-era/#ixzz0NYhz7LaR
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution No Derivatives
They are obviously good guys but I voted for Nadal. He exudes that "people's champion" character....just one of the guys you can have beer with.
James Blake, though of these two, Federer.
Arthur Ashe.
John Mcenroe comes in a close second.
Its hard to choose. On the one hand you have nadal with his gamesmanship, bellicose behavior toward his colleagues, and totally inimitable style that depends on some genetic mutation (artificial or otherwise).
On the other hand you have fed who is worldly, kind and generous to his colleages (after all, they love him so much... even his biggest rival can't shut up about him), and so passionate about the game that he lets his fans see his true emotions. They are both great role models imo.
Although it's really close, I would put McEnroe over Ashe. Hey, somebody's got to tell those pinheads (linesmen and umpires) how to do their jobs or they won't do them correctly. :shock: Buncha putzes.
Bill O'Reilly? Is that you?
Murray .
I think they are both excellent role models. They are both extremely competitive, driven players who are courteous and respectful both off an on the court. They push each other to new heights (and records) and bring out the best in eack others' skills. They both prioritize family and appear to have strong morals. They both take time for their fans, are gracious in interviews (for the most part) and have elevated the sport.
I agree w/ this, both are great models for any young person to follow, most of the tennis players are in fact. What's to say Roddick, DelPotro, Murray, Djokovic, Simon, Kolya aren't good role models as well?
All do great on the court and help give back to the game of tennis as well.
I agree. There are a few who I feel display poor sportsmanship and their personal lives are a tad questionable, but it is not for me to judge. I appreciate most of the top ten right now and am rooting them all on. I don't think it is necessary to hate one to enjoy another..sadly too many people feel the need to 'pick sides'.
James Blake, though of these two, Federer.
Easiest poll question ever in my opinion.This could be the toughest poll question in talk tennis history in my opinion. Both of these guys seem surreal to be perched number 1 and 2 in the world. The question is who is the better role model for tennis fans?
Easiest poll question ever in my opinion.
Id pick Federer 7 days a week. I think the butt-picking and the constant time-delaying is NOT something to look up to, i dont even recomend my kids that i teach trying to play like Nadal. Outside of the court, well its hard to understand what Nadal says so i pick Federer there aswell.
Nadal. I think the crying, patronising, blaming technology, insulting opponents' playing styles, smashing rackets, telling opponents' parents to be quiet when they have the audacity to cheer for their own son instead of him, wearung outrageous outfits just because you've won somewhere a lot, wearing those same outfits with the pants backwards, eating ice cream, and having a family and kids are NOT something to look up to.