Is that because everybody in France has a bad reputation?
Nadal doesn't care about thousands or even millions of dollars. What matters is the court said Bachelot was guilty. Nadal was vindicated.If the only expenditure that Nadal had for lawyers was the 2000 euros (unless those are legal fees paid to the french state for the court administration) those were some cheap *ss lawyers, I can tell you that.
Even if they had to do only what you claim, and I am positive that there is a little bit of additional work beyond that.
Funnily enough, Nadal's "best" defense was to release his medical record, which basically proves that Bachelot is right. Of course, it's all legal stuff (stem cells, etc.), like all professional cyclists are suffering from asthma, poor guys (and gals).
No worries, though, he'll win. ATP anti-doping protocol will remain as strong and as reliable as ever.
Whoever translated that doesn’t know the difference between economic and economical. Makes you wonder how accurate any of it is, especially when you are trying to get a feel for the emotive force of the judgementRafa filed a lawsuit against Mrs. Roselyne because she made a defamatory statement on French TV, not to get richer by suing her. He showed mercy to her by not destroying her financially.
Musy Isabelle @Isabellemusy 1h1 hour ago (Journalist)
La réaction de #Nadal suite à la décision de la justice française à l égard de Roselyne #Bachelot
O2 Hilfiger much better than FO effort
What do you mean by 'FO effort'? The picture of Rafa you posted was taken 9 years ago.
Anybody knows you can't usually prove a negative, except in mutually-exclusive predicates. I could make a thousand disgusting claims about you, and you would be unable to prove wrong every one of them.Challenge any of the things in that post with facts.
All investigations begin with suspicion though. Just talking generally.
All investigations begin with suspicion though. Just talking generally.
All players are under suspicion. That's why they submit to all those tests to begin with. Nadal is no different from any other player in that regard.
Man, seriously, are you an idiot?.
Not "anybody" knows that. Idiots don't know it.
Batchelot won't be flapping her gums about Nadal anytime soon.
She's, at least, €12.5k out of pocket because that does not include her own legal costs. I'm sure that will make a dent in her bank account. All she needed to do was retract her statement and publicly apologise to Rafa instead of going to court about something for which she had no justification whatsoever.Batchelot won't be flapping her gums about Nadal anytime soon.
I tend to give people the benefit of the dout, but... yeah. The level doesn't seem to be very high.
