umm....so you'll bash nadal, but not roddick?? sure roddick has turned around his season, but how many top 10 players has he beaten in 2006???
make a real argument, otherwise get off nadal
nadal lost to blake, big deal, he had a 2-0 record previously, both on hard courts, and this was also a hard court, a fast surface
i basically said who wants bad things to happen to a player? since when do we wish the worst to a player??
cmon wayne50, i dont know how old you are, but first compile the rest of the top 10 players, and their respective records against the top 10, in 2006
like federer would be ...i dont know how many wins, but 4 losses, all to nadal
compile a list like that first
I'm not talking about a comparison of top 10 records. The point is that Nadal can't challenge for majors or maintain No.2 ranking if he can't beat top 10 players. You claim that Nadal isn't finished as a force in tennis, but then conveniently ignore his terrible form and failure to beat big opponents in the last 5 months. And there's no reason to believe he'll turn it around at AO as it's his worst slam (never been past the 4th round) and he doesn't generally play well on HC.