Nadal to surpass the career greatness of Agassi.

What don't you get...Agassi is greatest ever, but he played for 20 years...Nadal has a ways to go, but he is clearly on his way...he actually has a real shot at surpassing Agassi...besides Fed, no one else playing today has a shot at Agassi's records. I don't think you know what you are talking about.

Pete Sampras is the best player tennis has ever seen...he has the most GS..the most coveted and important title of any touring pro.
 
Completely asinine.
Sampras didn't win French, so I agree with Bladepdp... No French...not greatest. See...you are right, GS are most important...I gues you have to win them all to be considered the greatest. The only argument you could make is that Sampras beat Agassi in the final at US Open 2x and Wimbeldon 1x (maybe 2?)...Anyway, it's close, but no French = not greatest
 
Why do you sound as excited as a young teenager when Rafa plays if you care about the game for 20 years ? Just a thought you know, nothing mean but Id give you 16 at most even if you scan your ID and post the pic here. :oops:
This may come as a shock to you but women get excited about guys long after they're 16... Actually women can do pretty much everything that men do, including having crushes on people younger than them. (I'm expanding your horizon here!) Have you ever heard of " Harold and Maud"? Lol. Maybe I am 80 years old but I'm young at heart :)
PS: more seriously, I'm excited about Nadal because I believe he's the best player (or the one with the best potential) I've seen in all those years...
 
Last edited:
This may come as a shock to you but women get excited about guys long after they're 16... Actually women can do pretty much everything that men do, including having crushes on people younger than them. (I'm expanding your horizon here!) Have you ever heard of " Harold and Maud"? Lol. Maybe I am 80 years old but I'm young at heart :)

Oh thanks. You know, I never understood women, thats why I keep one ( mine ) at home so I can have a second opinion. :)
 
No FO, no gold, no greatness.
There will never be a consensus about what criteria should come first for greatness. Personally I think big wins on all surfaces is rarer than massive domination on 1 or 2 of them. There really aren't that many players who achieved as well on fast and on slow surfaces so I would say it's quite a feat. However, you can't dismiss number of slams either... Maybe there isn't 1 GOAT, maybe there are several ones.
 
What is it that men can do and that women can't?

Hey I just realise that women, even older ones, are as stupid as 16 year olds when talking about sport. ;) That would be my definite conclusion based on what we wrote .. :)

Let me rephrase so no one is insulted, 'as smart' ..


LOL
 
Hey I just realise that women, even older ones, are as stupid as 16 year olds when talking about sport. ;) That would be my definite conclusion based on what we wrote .. :)

Let me rephrase so no one is insulted, 'as smart' ..


LOL

I'm pretty sure I can talk about sport without being as 'stupid as a 16 year' old.

*raising eyebrow*
 
What is it that men can do and that women can't?

Let see


The fastest humans in the world are men.
The highest jumpers and long jumpers are men.
The fastest swimmers are men.
The strongest humans in the world are men.
The greatest composers of music are men.
The greatest writers are men.
The greatest sculptures are men.
The greatest artist are men.

Plus, women can't pee standing up without getting there inner thighs soaked.
 
Hey I just realise that women, even older ones, are as stupid as 16 year olds when talking about sport. ;) That would be my definite conclusion based on what we wrote .. :)

Let me rephrase so no one is insulted, 'as smart' ..


LOL
I only said that Nadal was the best player I've ever seen. This is bound to be the most intelligent thing anyone has ever said no matter their age :)
 
Let see


The fastest humans in the world are men.
The highest jumpers and long jumpers are men.
The fastest swimmers are men.
The strongest humans in the world are men.
The greatest composers of music are men.
The greatest writers are men.
The greatest sculptures are men.
The greatest artist are men.


Plus, women can't pee standing up without getting there inner thighs soaked.

Bolded ones are subjective.

Once men start giving birth, then we'll talk! ;)
 
I'm pretty sure I can talk about sport without being as 'stupid as a 16 year' old.

*raising eyebrow*

You can't understand a joke, so is that another cultural thing or ... ?? Mind you not all 16 year olds are stupid, most are just immature.


Btw, I was just waiting for someone to come up and quote this, to be completely honest with you the reaction is the best way to sum up what I had to say about women. If you sad all men are stupid Id quickly reply with yeah baby, we need a couple of them ladys to help us out.
 
I only said that Nadal was the best player I've ever seen. This is bound to be the most intelligent thing anyone has ever said no matter their age :)

That really depends on how many players you had a crush on ... sorry how many players you saw .. :)
 
Bolded ones are subjective.

No they are not. When we start seeing women's masterpieces alongside (Picasso, Angelo, Da Vinci, Rembrandt, etc), then we could talk.

As for the birth thing. Way over rated. Just look at some of the posters on these boards. "masterpieces" gone way wrong.
 
Let see


The fastest humans in the world are men.
The highest jumpers and long jumpers are men.
The fastest swimmers are men.
The strongest humans in the world are men.
The greatest composers of music are men.
The greatest writers are men.
The greatest sculptures are men.
The greatest artist are men.

Plus, women can't pee standing up without getting there inner thighs soaked.

hitfv6.jpg
 
You can't understand a joke, so is that another cultural thing or ... ?? Mind you not all 16 year olds are stupid, most are just immature.


Btw, I was just waiting for someone to come up and quote this, to be completely honest with you the reaction is the best way to sum up what I had to say about women. If you sad all men are stupid Id quickly reply with yeah baby, we need a couple of them ladys to help us out.

You see the little 'raised eyebrow' there...that means that I got the joke.

Thanks for being condescending anyway, though.

I would never post that all men are stupid...I know better.
 
No they are not. When we start seeing women's masterpieces alongside (Picasso, Angelo, Da Vinci, Rembrandt, etc), then we could talk.

As for the birth thing. Way over rated. Just look at some of the posters on these boards. "masterpieces" gone way wrong.

Hmm, I can't help but think of the great Romantic composer Robert Schumann. You see, much of the music attributed to him was written...by his wife, Clara.

Subjective. You can't prove it. You don't see women's masterpieces alongside them because the women weren't allowed to do those things. And if they did, they couldn't share it.

I agree with you, though, on the 'masterpieces' gone wrong!
 
Let see


The fastest humans in the world are men. (and yet women can run too)
The highest jumpers and long jumpers are men. (and yet women can jump too)
The fastest swimmers are men. (and yet women can swim too)
The strongest humans in the world are men. (and yet some women are very strong)
The greatest composers of music are men. (today there are a lot of women composers)
The greatest writers are men. (Have you ever heard of Mary Shelley, Jane Austen, the Bronte sisters, Virginia Woolf, Doris Lessing, Iris Murdoch, Edith Wharton, Sylvia Plath, Emily Dickinson...? If not go back to school right away!)
The greatest sculptures are men. ( Go see the film about Camille Claudel)
The greatest artist are men. (How about Frida Kahlo, Mary Cassatt and Georgia O'Keefe?)

Plus, women can't pee standing up without getting there inner thighs soaked.
(they can pee, which is good enough for the sake of our argument)
I never said that women were better than men or vice versa. I said they can do the same things and obviously I'm right!
 
Hmm, I can't help but think of the great Romantic composer Robert Schumann. You see, much of the music attributed to him was written...by his wife, Clara.

Subjective. You can't prove it. You don't see women's masterpieces alongside them because the women weren't allowed to do those things. And if they did, they couldn't share it.

I agree with you, though, on the 'masterpieces' gone wrong!

Try again. One person by the name of Schumann does not equal the likes of Plato, Socrate, Aristotle, Jesus Christ, Drakulie, Beethoven, Mozart, Stokes, Ghandi, Khan, Captain Kirk, Angelo, Picasso, Rembrandt, etc, etc, etc, etc etc
 
(they can pee, which is good enough for the sake of our argument)
I never said that women were better than men or vice versa. I said they can do the same things and obviously I'm right!

Uhmm, No they can't.

Name one woman that has hit a serve 163 mph, or hit over 700 homeruns in a lifetime?? Or run a faster 100 than a man?? Or lifted more weight than a man?? No go wipe your legs. That urine is starting to smell.
 
Try again. One person by the name of Schumann does not equal the likes of Plato, Socrate, Aristotle, Jesus Christ, Drakulie, Beethoven, Mozart, Stokes, Ghandi, Khan, Captain Kirk, Angelo, Picasso, Rembrandt, etc, etc, etc, etc etc

I'm not familiar with one in bold?

*eyebrow* <-----THIS MEANS I GET THE JOKE!
 
You see the little 'raised eyebrow' there...that means that I got the joke.

Thanks for being condescending anyway, though.

I would never post that all men are stupid...I know better.


But why would you not post the truth ? Of course we're stupid in our unique way. I never quite understood how do women find their way to the ultimate champions in stupidity all the time as those guys ( I admit Im not that stupid .. ) usually get most of the girls .. :)
 
I'm not familiar with one in bold?

*eyebrow* <-----THIS MEANS I GET THE JOKE!

*eyebrow* x 10 ?

You did not hear of allmighty Drakulie ? Im sure he'll explain latter but you must be exausted if you missed such greatness. And get a bigger frame asap.
 
But why would you not post the truth ? Of course we're stupid in our unique way. I never quite understood how do women find their way to the ultimate champions in stupidity all the time as those guys ( I admit Im not that stupid .. ) usually get most of the girls .. :)

All I posted was that I can talk about sport without sounding like a 'stupid' 16 year old? I'm confused now...to be honest.

Most people are stupid. That's why we're all going to h*ll in a handbasket, and real quick, too.

I don't like stupid guys. Which would explain why I'm single!!!!
 
Uhmm, No they can't.

Name one woman that has hit a serve 163 mph, or hit over 700 homeruns in a lifetime?? Or run a faster 100 than a man?? Or lifted more weight than a man?? No go wipe your legs. That urine is starting to smell.

Name one man who has given birth!!! :)

What the h*ll was this thread about anyway??? LOL

*eyebrow* x 10 ?

You did not hear of allmighty Drakulie ? Im sure he'll explain latter but you must be exausted if you missed such greatness. And get a bigger frame asap.

See, I can only do the left eyebrow, not the right...so I'm not sure I can do *eyebrow* x 10!!!

I've heard some things of this Drakulie...and a disco shirt, but it is all very hazy.

I'm at 105 sq inches and holding!
 
Try again. One person by the name of Schumann does not equal the likes of Plato, Socrate, Aristotle, Jesus Christ, Drakulie, Beethoven, Mozart, Stokes, Ghandi, Khan, Captain Kirk, Angelo, Picasso, Rembrandt, etc, etc, etc, etc etc

You forgot Michael Angelo. He was amazing.
 
But why would you not post the truth ? Of course we're stupid in our unique way. I never quite understood how do women find their way to the ultimate champions in stupidity all the time as those guys ( I admit Im not that stupid .. ) usually get most of the girls .. :)
Maybe those guys are just less stupid than you think (either that or they have other assets :p)
 
All I posted was that I can talk about sport without sounding like a 'stupid' 16 year old? I'm confused now...to be honest.

Most people are stupid. That's why we're all going to h*ll in a handbasket, and real quick, too.

I don't like stupid guys. Which would explain why I'm single!!!!

Nah, love yourself and hate the stupidity at the same time - no need to be single. Take the best of what comes at you and ignore the bad stuff which inevetably comes with it. :)
 
Uhmm, No they can't.

Name one woman that has hit a serve 163 mph, or hit over 700 homeruns in a lifetime?? Or run a faster 100 than a man?? Or lifted more weight than a man?? No go wipe your legs. That urine is starting to smell.
Maybe but they can win more slams! Have you ever heard of Stefi Graf?
 
Maybe but they can win more slams! Have you ever heard of Stefi Graf?

Those are women slams, they count 3 for 1 of mens. :) True story, she won a slam final in 34 minutes. I am trying to think but i can not recall last time a set in mens final ended in 34m. Oh sorry I remember, Rafa slaughtered some guy who was considered a G.O.A.T. at the time but turned out he's a scapeGOAT.
 
Those are women slams, they count 3 for 1 of mens. :) True story, she won a slam final in 34 minutes. I am trying to think but i can not recall last time a set in mens final ended in 34m. Oh sorry I remember, Rafa slaughtered some guy who was considered a G.O.A.T. at the time but turned out he's a scapeGOAT.
Ha ha nice, you're inspired tonight!
 
The hard courts are fair as far as how the ball bounces etc. Im sure Nadal doesnt mind, he's carving it up on the Hard courts and won the biggest prize of all on it!. Its the harshnes of the surface that disadvantages some players. Makes it too hard for them to play their natural style for too many matches or tournamnets in a row. Humans wernt built to pound for 2/3 of the year for up to 6 hours a day(play and practice) on such hard surfaces.

More natural surface tournaments would just be better for tennis. The masters series tournaments after the US open should be on natural surfaces.

Anyways Nadal is well on his way to becoming the best of the era. :) Or is he alreday the best of hsi era due to his dominating h2h(most in big finals) v Fed?:)







I actually think hardcourts are the fairest surface, because it is the only surface which does not strongly favour any playing style and requires no specialization. You can play your game whether you are a defensive or aggressive player. Clay and grass give the advantage to one or the other. The bounce on hardcourts is not too high for those who use classical grips (eastern) or too low for those who use more extreme grips (western). Then there is the issue of footing. Hardcourts are intuitive to everyone, because everyone spends most of their time walking on surfaces with traction. When they get on a hardcourt, no unfamiliar mental or physical adjustments are required. They can just run and play normally. More than half the tour do not have enough experience on clay courts when growing up, so present no consistent threat to those who grow up playing predominantly on clay.

Clay court specialists really have nothing to complain about. They have more than their fair share of tournaments. They have a Grand Slam, 1/3 of the Masters Series events and more than enough International Series tournaments to fill up their optionals. Then there is grass, which no player has a great deal of experience playing on, but still has a Grand Slam. And lastly hardcourts, which provide a neutral ground for players to play whatever style they like. Hardcourts, quite rightly, are the slightly more dominant surface on tour.
 
Back
Top