The difference between Federer and Nadal is this: Federer had a crushing defeat at the hands of Djokovic at the Australian in 08, proving that young up-and-comers were finally catching up with Federer. Then he had a string of losses, including four in a row to Nadal - two masters finals, a humiliating defeat in the French final, and a heartbreaking loss at Wimbledon. What does Federer do? He turns around and wins the U.S. Open.
Nadal, on the other hand, has one big loss to Soderling at the French and goes M.I.A. for the rest of the season. What mental strength he has, people!
I've said before. Roger was once in a drought where many people have written him off. They said he was finish, never again to win another slam or even reclaiming the #1 ranking. However, Roger proved them wrong. He came back strong after being knocked down, fight like a gladiator and reclaimed his throne back. Order has been restored!
Now that Nadal has been down and out after being severely beaten, it's his turn to stand up and fight. Let see what kind of a gladiator he his(with smaller muscles). He's got 10 months to climb back to the top.
Err.. what happened to poor Soderling? I mean did he win a slam, did he win that pathetic tournament in London. Quite a record for someone who beat one of our finest players. Must have got lucky to play one of our finest players when he was on his last legs.
First of all,why 10 months?
Second,Nadal did come back,year after year,if it's one thing he doesn't lack, it is fighting attitude. His game is missing right now,not his fight. Nadal came back after countless humiliations in the second part of the season in the 2005-2008 seasons and managed to win AO after inching closer and closer. Not to mention him coming back at WB time and time again,even when he was defeated by Roger in 06' and 07'(and he was in tears in 07' after the match).
Nadal's "comeback" depends on his body first and his mind second. If he gets injured every other tournament,takes breaks,loses what little rhythm he has,then it will be nigh impossible for him to do it.
When Federer had his problems last year he still competed very well in slams because he can do more on court than Rafa and were it not for Rafa,he would have won the RG-WB double even in his "mono" year.
Like I said,Fed had some physical problems in AO 08' but after that it was more a mental problem than anything. He played just as well in RG-WB in 08' as he did in 09',except in the finals obviously. In fact,he had more trouble reaching finals in RG 09' than he did in RG 08' and in WB 09' he actually lost a set before the final unlike in WB 08'. Nadal's problem is mostly physical,much tougher to repair than a mental block.
It took Roger roughly 10 months to get back to the top from losing his #1 ranking and regain it back. In 2008, Roger was down and out. He lost the AO, RG, SW19. Throughout the year, he had numerous losses against the players he normally owned. He played one of his worst match in his life against Blake in Beijing, and finally surrender his #1 ranking. Roger was at the lowest point in his career and consider how dominant he once was, it was a difficult position. However, he was able to fight back, regain his supremacy, and also against critics, fans who written him off(or atleast question his abillity). Within 10 months after losing his #1 ranking, Roger won USO in 2008. In 2009, he won 2 more GS, and 2 GS finalist, and reclaimed his #1 again. That's why I want to see if Rafa can do it in a span of 10 months. What do you want, 12 months? Keep in mind Rafa was way ahead of Federer in ATP points in 2009, but starting 2010, Roger is around 1,300 points ahead of Rafa, so Rafa should have an easier road to get back to the top than Federer did in 2009.
Nadal did not come back year after year. He was always a 1 slam per year, the best on clay, and consistent at staying #2. 2008 was his best year, first time he won 2 slams, reaching the highest ATP in his career, and of course reach #1 for the first time in his career. It's the 2009 were he's knocked out cold. Even though he won AO, but he failed to defend his best surface(RG), and loses countless of time to the top ten players. The WTF was the final blow to him. Pretty much, he's right where Roger's once was after 2008 Olympic. Now he's got a chance to prove himself if he can come back and be an undispute champ like Roger did, and prove all the critics and some fans wrong for written him off. 10 is not enough for you, fine. I don't care if it's 12 or 15 months, if he can't do it, that means he's not as TOUGH as Roger. You cannot say Roger has problem mentally b/c his slams results this year had alot to do with his mental strength besides his ability. Without mental strengh, Roger would of never be where he is right now since the last match he lost to Blake last year.
Nadal vs Soderling 2007 Wimbledon 3rd Round Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kekqGjTukvA
Nadal vs Soderling 2007 Wimbledon 3rd Round Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwASk_MtlPQ&feature=related
man I want this NADAL back in 2010 season.
Nadal hits flat shots in this match and returns are great.
Very good match.
Why visit the past (over 2 years ago? You serious?), and look at today (the most recent match of the two)...yeah, dream on kid, dream on!! While you dream about Nadal, make sure you dress exactly like him before you go to bed...