Yeah, keep rolling your eyes, but it's not going to convince the non-VB that Nadal wouldn't want to avoid Federer and rather face the lesser players.
Yeah, keep rolling your eyes, but it's not going to convince the non-VB that Nadal wouldn't want to avoid Federer and rather face the lesser players.
So when he misses tournaments it is because he is scared? And, if he were injured he would play as long as he isn't scared?
Nadal fears no one. Big match player? What a moronic comment. That's why his slam record against the other top guys is so lopsided.
Yeah, keep rolling your eyes, but it's not going to convince the non-VB that Nadal wouldn't want to avoid Federer and rather face the lesser players.
Avoidance implies fear?Take time and read this title / article... slowly..one word at a time. LMAO.
Top-seeded Rafael Nadal admits he'd rather not face third-seeded Roger Federer at US Open
http://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/20466488/rafael-nadal-does-not-want-face-roger-federer-us-open
Avoidance implies fear?
Stop attempting to put lipstic on that pig. Look at Nadal's Slam H2H against Federer and get back to me. Nadal has the same number of slams Fed had at his age, even with multiple slams he had to sit out due to injury. Logic is not your strong suit.You’re not a big match player if for example you basically never get to second week of Wimbledon since 25 like nadal. It’s false logic. 4R if a grandslam is a big match. Losing like nadal always does his whole career means he isn’t a big match player
But yes big individual matches - the biggest AO 17 he lost, in his own words AO 2012 was GOAT match all time. He lost. Wimbledon 07, countless individual matches were he lost important records e.g. fed ending his clay streak and preventing what could have been who knows a hundred match streak, losing multiple chances to do CYGS, or complete masters set or get a WTF championship to his CV
Don’t get me wrong he is very strong mentally and can bring exceptional performances but big
Match player is false logic. 4R of a slam is a huge match too so is semis and nadal has never bested 4 semis a season bar once his whole career
Don't you attempt to avoid stepping on dog excrement too? Does it mean you are afraid of it?I would like to avoid
I would prefer someone easy
I don't want to face him
Looks like heck of a lot of fear !
Stepping down to the homosexual allegations? Let me guess: you have no sets of twins yourself.Fed is as alpha as you are going to see. 2 sets of perfect pair twins .
And Rafa - can't make up his mind between Xisca and Monaco .
Stepping down to the homosexual allegations? Let me guess: you have no sets of twins yourself.
Don't you attempt to avoid stepping on dog excrement too? Does it mean you are afraid of it?
Here is what the supposedly gladiator / warrior said on the eve of USO :
"If I am in semifinals, not, I prefer to play against another one," Nadal said when asked if he wanted to face Federer in the semifinals. "Is obvious, no? I am not that way [to want the matchup]. Sounds very good, but the real thing, I prefer to play against another player, an easier one if it's possible."
Who wouldn't want to play an easier opponent? That's common sense dude. Doesn't have to imply fear. Even during the time Nadal was beating fed every time they stepped on court he told the media he rather wants to play an easier opponent if possible. That is pretty logical.
Stop attempting to put lipstic on that pig. Look at Nadal's Slam H2H against Federer and get back to me. Nadal has the same number of slams Fed had at his age, even with multiple slams he had to sit out due to injury. Logic is not your strong suit.
Who wouldn't want to play an easier opponent? That's common sense dude. Doesn't have to imply fear. Even during the time Nadal was beating fed every time they stepped on court he told the media he rather wants to play an easier opponent if possible. That is pretty logical.
Oh. There was me thinking Nadal was YE1.H2H is the only thing left he has going for his fans
This that alternate reality stuff again.Nadal losing 6 times to 36 year Fed is equivalent to losing 12 times to a normal aged tennis player .
Fed fans are not the only ones whose fans post smack talk trolley threads.This thread is yet another proof that Fed's worshipers have a well-oiled propaganda apparatus.
16 slams vs 19. Nadal has 6 on his worse surfaces, and Federer is lucky to have 1. Can we at least agree that 1 slam is 1 slam, or is that something that Federer fans can't understand even at this point?Think he has 1 less but besides the point. He also has 4 less AO, 6 less wimby, 2 less USO and 7 less WTF. Is he gonna catch these up too lol
You can’t give nadal morally more slams than he has. Otherwise let’s just say Zverev with 0 slams is GOAT or with his already 2 masters will be masters GOAT at least
Lol at h2h. Lol Glad you brought h2h up actually VB have been quiet about ever since Djokovic went 7-0 twice v peak nadal and leads h2h
What’s muellers wimbeldon head to head with nadal? 2-1. He’s better than nadal right despite less wimbys though right as according to your logic nadal is better despite less everything everywhere besides 1 slam and 3 associated events.
Clay makes or breaks nadal
Just for kicks take out feds grass from career. Still has 11 slams, 7 WTF, 28 masters. He’s a GOAT candiate.
Do that with nadal. He’s basically Murray and he’s definitely not an ATG
You are using "afraid" with two completely different meanings. You want to imply that Nadal is "terrified" of Federer. It looks to me that some Fed fans still haven't gotten over Nadal's domination, even on Fed's best year, and they feel the need to turn the tables around and "strike back".You are afraid the dog poo is going to mess your feet . BTW, you are reaching here and we stick to tennis . shall we ?
But femininity and sexual orientation are not the same thing. Everybody (men and women) have feminine and masculine traits. Did you know that all fetuses start as female and then either continue developing into female or start becoming male? The only thing that determines male/female traits (except primary sexual attributes, aka sex organs), is hormones.Hey, you went there first with the feminine allegation , not me !
16 slams vs 19. Nadal has 6 on his worse surfaces, and Federer is lucky to have 1. Can we at least agree that 1 slam is 1 slam, or is that something that Federer fans can't understand even at this point?
How dare you call feminine charscteistsics feminine and masculine characteristics masculine.But femininity and sexual orientation are not the same thing. Everybody (men and women) have feminine and masculine traits. Did you know that all fetuses start as female and then either continue developing into female or start becoming male? The only thing that determines male/female traits (except primary sexual attributes, aka sex organs), is hormones.
Some homosexual men are very masculine, and some straight men are very feminine. And the same with the ladies.
I pointed out that Fed was crying like a girl (for which there is ample documental evidence from multiple impartial sources). What you said is just nonsense and doesn't correspond to reality. (*)
(*) Unless Pico told you something after sex. HAHA
If Fed is the goat wouldn’t it mean losIng 6 times to him is like losing less than to normal players??This that alternate reality stuff again.
the nadal ?! ... scared ???
Rafael Nadal reveals he fears meeting Roger Federer in ATP World Tour final
GETTY
Rafael Nadal has lost four times to Roger Federer this season
RAFAEL NADAL is not optimistic about his chances in the ATP World Tour final if Roger Federer is his opponent.
By JAMES CAMBRIDGE
PUBLISHED: 00:00, Fri, Nov 10, 2017UPDATED: 00:15, Fri, Nov 10, 2017
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Google+Share with EmailShare via Whatsapp
Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer are on opposite sides of the ATP World Tour Finals draw, meaning they can meet in the final later this month.
However, the Spaniard is not relishing the opportunity, having lost on all four occasions to the Swiss this year.
"My dream is to win the tournament,” Nadal told Sky Sports.
“And if I play Roger in the final then my chances are less than playing another player.
Rafael Nadal knows his chances of beating Roger Federer in the final are slim
“But I would love to play in the final and if I play Roger then I will try my best to beat him.
"It's true that I play Roger every time this year on the surfaces that are better for him.
“But I will just fight to win my first match of the year against him."
Nadal has already cemented himself as the year-end world No 1 after Federer was forced to miss the Paris Masters.
However, the 31-year-old admitted he too is feeling the effects of a long season and might not be 100 per cent for the ATP Finals, with a troublesome knee forcing him to withdraw from Paris at the quarter-final stage.
“Let's see if I am able to be 100 per cent to compete,” he added.
“I went back home and visited the doctors to do some treatment. I expect the treatment to work and be ready for here.
"I know I'm confident because I'm having a great season with one event to go. I am here to try my best."
Yes, and Fed has 9 less French Opens, which you seem to always forget quite conveniently.Yes a slam is a slam
Federer has 4 more AO, 6 more Wimbledon’s, 2 more USO. Lol. And three more slams overall. A hell of a lot more finals, semis and records. Nadal has no records on anything but clay. Nadal is not even an ATG anything but clay. He is a clay courter end of. Nothing wrong with that but that’s it. Nothing more nothing less and laughable compared to fed who is literall GOAT on three surfaces and tennis in general
Silly and arbitrary stat re 1 slam. Nadal has 1 title in his worst surface indoors. For reference davednko has 6 indoor titles and federe has around 20 titles on all four surfaces including clay. He is the only one of his peers who is so ineffective on a whole type of tennis. He isn’t relatively weak indoors he is absolutely weak.
Although yes I agree with you fed is weak on clay. All of nadals competition in clay is weak. He is the ultimate weak era slam inflater. Considering his entrie career and legacy is built only on clay this sucks for VB.
LOL. Masterful! That monologue there wouldn't be out of place in a classic Monty Python sketch.How dare you call feminine charscteistsics feminine and masculine characteristics masculine.
I think masculine characteristics are feminine and feminine are masculine and I identify as a 403 lb albino honey badger with two pumpkins as my mother and my father is this here binder from work that contains notes on excel software training.
And I am triggered.
Yes, and Fed has 9 less French Opens, which you seem to always forget quite conveniently.
And no, you are wrong as usual. Neither Fed nor Nadal are weak on any surface. If you were an actual Fed fan you would know that he has been a terrific clay tennis player, only overshadowed by the best ever.
Yes, and Fed has 9 less French Opens, which you seem to always forget quite conveniently.
And no, you are wrong as usual. Neither Fed nor Nadal are weak on any surface. If you were an actual Fed fan you would know that he has been a terrific clay tennis player, only overshadowed by the best ever.
the nadal ?! ... scared ???
I agree Fed is GOAT. I like all your stats. Great work.Absolutely I don’t forget. Nadal has 9 more FO, 3 more masters. Fed has more AO, WIMB, US, WTF and every single master bar 3 clay ones.
Fed has a superior record in literally every single tournament on the tour outside of clay. That’s every slam, WTF, every masters bar the 3 clay ones. Nadal doesn’t have a single record at any non clay tournament. Hasn’t defended a single non clay slam. In other words 3 slams.
Hence all nadal is is a clay courter. Nothing wrong with that. It’s just that’s all he is. It’s laughable to say he is tennis GOAT. He is literally dog poop indoors for one. Davednko is better. You’re. Or a GOAT if a journeyman non slam winner is better than you at a type of tennis. It would be like if ferrer was better than Federer on clay.
Fed take your pick from hard court GOAT, Grass GOAT or indoor GOAT.
Also your saying fed is a ATG on clay? By default you’re sYing he is GOAT. He is already GOAT on other 3 surfaces and objectively most successful. Now you’re saying he’s ATG on clay as well. Debate solved guy has mastered tennis. Nadal isn’t an ATG anywhere bare clay and is literally a dud indoors
Ahhhh... I see. You are using VB standards against them. Nice one. Your stats work was crazy good.He is an ATG in the real world but in vamoss brigrade alternative universe by their own logic he can’t be a ATG if you apply exact same arguments they use against Federer. He is in fact by that logic a mug and weak and one dimensional with a gaping hole in his resume.
And I’d say he is an ATG on other surfaces by peak level of play. By actual results that’s debatable. But yes you could go either way. There were a lot of finals but too many mug losses in peak years. Way way too many
Since all Nadal is is a clay courter, then Federer can't be GOAT, since he lost in Wimbledon and at the AO to a clay courter. A true GOAT would never lose on his best surfaces to a clay courter. Sad for Fed's aspirations.Hence all nadal is is a clay courter.
Nadal doesn't really suck indoors, it's just his worst surface. He played the WTF final twice, didn't he? There are no slams played indoors after all. That's how important indoors is.Lol just read that again. Nadal has 1 indoor title in his whole career. For reference davednko has 6 and has a leading h2h against nadal there. Nadal sucks indoors.
For reference fed has around 20 titles all surfaces. Nadal has 1 indoors! 1! And it was a fluke indoors in Spain ahaha! He doesn’t even have 10 on grass. Does he even have 10 on hard lol?
But femininity and sexual orientation are not the same thing. Everybody (men and women) have feminine and masculine traits. Did you know that all fetuses start as female and then either continue developing into female or start becoming male? The only thing that determines male/female traits (except primary sexual attributes, aka sex organs), is hormones.
Some homosexual men are very masculine, and some straight men are very feminine. And the same with the ladies.
I pointed out that Fed was crying like a girl (for which there is ample documental evidence from multiple impartial sources). What you said is just nonsense and doesn't correspond to reality. (*)
(*) Unless Pico told you something after sex. HAHA
You are using "afraid" with two completely different meanings. You want to imply that Nadal is "terrified" of Federer. It looks to me that some Fed fans still haven't gotten over Nadal's domination, even on Fed's best year, and they feel the need to turn the tables around and "strike back".
Nadal doesn't really suck indoors, it's just his worst surface. He played the WTF final twice, didn't he? There are no slams played indoors after all. That's how important indoors is.
Does your Thesaurus not include "wetting one's diapers" ?afraid
synonyms: frightened, scared, terrified, fearful, petrified, scared witless, scared to death, terror-stricken, terror-struck, frightened out of one's wits, scared out of one's wits, shaking in one's shoes, shaking like a leaf;
Nadal doesn't really suck indoors, it's just his worst surface. He played the WTF final twice, didn't he? There are no slams played indoors after all. That's how important indoors is.
Nadal doesn't really suck indoors, it's just his worst surface. He played the WTF final twice, didn't he? There are no slams played indoors after all. That's how important indoors is.
Nadal has never defended a non-clay title in his entire career. Not even a 250.And has he even defended a non slam tournament?
Nadal has never defended a non-clay title in his entire career.
OMG, not another blemish on his spotless career !Nadal has never defended a non-clay title in his entire career. Not even a 250.
Does your Thesaurus not include "wetting one's diapers" ?
just kidding, guys